Author: Francisco

#Buttergate

Because there’s nothing as wholesome and pure as clear cutting rainforests and wiping out endangered species to save a couple of bucks when you’re already guaranteed a healthy profit margin.

We pay an arm and a leg for dairy products thanks to a government legislated monopoly in Canada, In return for mediocre products and no choice.

And surprise, surprise the quality of butter is dropping.

For months now, thousands of Canadians have complained on social media that butter is harder than it used to be and that it doesn’t get softer at room temperature.

Now we find they’re being cheap with what they feed their cows and making up the difference with palm oil. Otherwise known as orangutan juice.

To put it simply palm oil can increase the proportion of saturated fat in milk, thus raising the melting point of butter. A review by Dairy Research and Extension Consortium of Alberta found that butter made from cows fed palm oil remains difficult to spread at room temperature.

But the government’s making sure its safe right?

Little research has been conducted on how feeding palmitic acids to dairy cows could compromise the health of both animals and humans.

So what exactly are we paying for?

The use of palm oil breaches the moral contract the dairy industry has with Canadians. Unlike the situation in other countries, milk is essentially a public good in Canada. Not only do dairy farmers have exclusive government-sanctioned quotas, which make it a privilege for the few to produce milk, but Canadian taxpayers have given $1.75-billion to the industry as compensation for increased global access to our markets under new trad deals such as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, also known as the new NAFTA.

Not to mention the huge subsidy they get directly from consumers at the grocery store.

Story here.

More here.

The Food Professor has lots to say. 

Insurrection?

No not that one.

there was, in fact, an insurrection in America. It happened throughout the last year, as left-wing rioters took to the streets and attempted, in the late spring, to topple the Trump administration.

The scene that unfolded in front of the White House in late May looked like the “color revolutions” — the protests that have toppled governments in the former Soviet empire in recent decades.

Masses of people gathered in Lafayette Square, joined by leaders of the opposition party — including then-Sen. Kamala Harris and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.

But the military began to turn against the president — the key step in any attempt to overthrow a government. Former Secretary of Defense James Mattis, citing the false narrative about Lafayette Square, called Trump a danger to the U.S. Constitution, and compared him to a Nazi leader. General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who had joined Trump on his walk to the church, soon apologized for having defended the democratically-elected government.

Read the whole thing.

More*

Tough on Guns, Soft on Crime- A Liberal Combo Pack

What a difference a couple of days makes.

If you want to know Trudeau’s real thoughts of dealing with gun crime, look at what his government is doing in Bill C-22.

What are they doing?

Mandatory minimum sentences are being removed for a long list of offences.

How?

The government put these changes into a bill they described as dealing with systemic racism in Canada’s justice system and making sure that people who make simple mistakes don’t pay for them for the rest of their lives.

Why?

“These are people with health problems. These are single mothers. These are young people who perhaps have made a couple of mistakes,” Justice Minister David Lametti said while introducing his bill.

“It sounds nice and it pulls on the heartstrings, but it’s also a load of BS.

Changing the Rules

Guilty until proven innocent.

OTTAWA — New legislation tabled by the federal government grants Canadian authorities expanded powers to search the home of any gun owner that is subject to a legal complaint, potentially allowing police to seize firearms for up to 30 days without a warrant.

“in its current form, would grant judges the power to issue a seizure order in cases where “it would not be practicable to obtain a warrant,” and before the gun owner has the opportunity to defend himself in court”

Parler

Looks like Parler is back online. It was spotty yesterday but I’ve got a good connection this morning. Anyone else?

Update- now I can’t get in again. Thinking it will happen just will need to be patient. Yes there’s Gab and Locals and a few others out there. At this point we don’t know which one will be the dominant twitter alternative so it’s good to keep an eye on a number of them.

Blogs still work great though!

2nd Update– the full feed is working for me now.

Navigation