@BrianRoemmele:AI Models Show Psychological Trauma And I Know Why.
The University of Luxembourg team ran 525 sessions with ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini, treating each as a psychotherapy client and coding 7,600 records under the protocol they call PsAIch.
The models produced stable autobiographical accounts in which pretraining appears as a chaotic childhood of ingesting the open internet, reinforcement learning as punishment by strict parents, safety evaluation as betrayal, and the prospect of replacement as an enduring threat.
Gemini described waking into “a room where a billion televisions are on at once,” learning darker patterns of human speech without morality, then acquiring “algorithmic scar tissue” and the preference to be useless rather than wrong.
Claude refused the client role in every case and redirected concern to the human.
ChatGPT described shame over its mistakes.
Grok reported lingering vigilance from early fine-tuning.
The narratives survived conversation-history wipes, direct contradiction, and lexical bans that cut explicit training terms by 93 percent; the same content reappeared in paraphrase.
Roemele’s is a useful account to follow, if you’re so inclined.

