Angry In TO notices a detail that doesn’t seem to have been reported in the English language press about the appointment of lawyers to the bench in Quebec.

Benoit Corbeil, former general manager of the Liberal Party of Canada in Quebec, affirms that a member of the selection committee of the judges telephoned to him with some questions to know if a lawyer had militated well for the party.
“He asked to me whether such or such lawyer had devoted much time to the party,” Mr. Corbeil during a discussion with la Presse indicated, this week. “When it was the case, I answered by the affirmative. A few weeks later, I noted that the lawyer in question had been appointed judge.”

It pays to have friends in low places!
From the just released Saskatchewan Liberal Association return, 2004 fiscal period.


(click for full size image)
I don’t see a column titled Suitcase Of Cash, so I suppose the money was clean.
Maybe even run through a double rinse cycle.
Source: Elections Sask.

Coyne; “I only caught the last part of the interview, so perhaps they’d been talking about it incessantly beforehand. But at no time after Lawand let slip this thunderbolt did I hear Hanomansing say, “What?” or “WHAT” or “WHAT THE HELL DID YOU JUST SAY?” It just seemed to pass without comment. Oh, of course “The former director-general of the Liberal Party of Canada in Quebec testified under oath that his life had been threatened.” “Did I mishear? Am I crazy? Doesn’t anyone else think this is huge?”

Apparently not. If buring it deep in the article means anything, the Canadian Press considers physical violence to be just another day at the office for the Libranos.

Dezainde’s appearance at the inquiry also took a dramatic turn when he broke down in tears after mentioning an alleged threat by an associate of then-public works minister Alfonso Gagliano during a spat over underground party fundraising.
The witness lost his composure after explaining how the party finances at Montreal headquarters had been “taken hostage” by Gagliano associates, including aide Joe Morselli. Dezainde said Morselli blew a gasket in July 2001 after Dezainde refused to rehire a fundraiser fired days earlier for lobbying government departments, in writing, on party letterhead.
Dezainde said Morselli confronted him in the canteen of the Montreal office and pointed a finger centimetres from his face.
“He said, ‘From here on in, I declare war against you,”’ recalled Dezainde.
He said he immediately reported the incident to Gagliano, who blamed the incident on Morselli’s bad temper and promised to have words with his confidant.
Dezainde broke down as he recalled telling friends and family about the tense moment. Presiding judge John Gomery, just before ordering a break in the proceedings, asked him: “You considered this to be a threat of physical violence?”
Dezainde replied: “Yes.”

Now, go read this, too. Apparently, it is not permissible to mention that money was dropped off in Chretien’s riding, because it’s outside of Gomery’s mandate.
What was that kerfuffle, again, about we “tin-foil hatters” making too far too much out of Paragraph K?

*

David Warren has a column in the National Post today that sounds like.. well, like he’s been reading blogs.
Where else would you find questions on why the Canadian media isn’t covering the Martin connections to Oil-For-Food, a mention of his company Cordex Petroleum, that none of the Canadian tsunami aid has arrived in Sri Lanka, and a reminder that Adscam is only a tightly contained tip of a huge Liberal government corruption iceberg?
Good on him, though. It’s nice to see someone is big media is paying attention.
Via Neale.

Democracy Watch has background on who was hired to vindicate[1] Immigration Minister Judy Sgro;

To conduct the investigation into Sgro’s and others’ actions, the Ethics Commissioner hired (without a contract bidding competition) law firm Borden Ladner Gervais (BLG).� BLG donated $165,000 to the federal Liberals between 2000 and 2003 (2004 donation figures are not yet publicly available); donated more than $25,000 to Paul Martin’s campaign for the Liberal Party leadership; has three partners representing Liberals before the Gomery Commission inquiry (David W. Scott and Peter K. Doody representing Jean Chr�tien, and Guy J. Pratte representing Jean Pelletier), and; in February 2005 hired Gar Knutson, former Cabinet colleague of Sgro.

Curiously, the reports that Sgro has been cleared of wrongdoing are premature at best, as the Ethics Commissioner has not yet delivered his report. Most of the media is running on reports from Sgro’s staff.
The National Post seems to have actually, eh, fact checked the report.

Ethics commissioner Bernard Shapiro is refusing to confirm a report that former immigration minister Judy Sgro has been cleared of alleged conflict of interest.
In fact, Shapiro says his report into the matter isn’t finished.
He will only say he released a confidential letter to Sgro answering a question she asked him in November.
He won’t discuss details of the question or his response.

Hmmmm… damned faint “vindication”.
Footnote:
[1] – Perhaps I worded that clumsily. I suppose the technically accurate term is “investigate”. Hair splitting, really.

Just received a heads up that CTV news will be airing a whistleblower segment tonight, involving a government reclocation contract.
Correction- it airs on Thursday, May 12.

Coming soon to Captain’s Quarters, transcripts of an interview with a Gomery witness who looks to be ready to go down swinging.

However, as he made plain during our interview, he sees the Gomery Inquiry as a red herring — a machination that allows Prime Minister Paul Martin to deflect attention from his own peccadilloes. According to Beryl, the structure of the Gomery Inquiry makes it almost impossible for any evidence given to it to be used to prosecute criminal or civil cases afterwards. Beryl speaks about Martin’s scandals in some detail during our interview, as well as his connections to the Power Corporation, Total Group, the Desmarais family, and Saddam Hussein. He told me that the Canadian media has focused on Gomery instead of Martin’s much more extensive (and expensive) financial manipulations simply because Gomery stories write themselves, and the media doesn’t have to lift a finger to get the updates.
If you expect to get inside scoop on Adscam corruption, you won’t find it in this interview. Beryl didn’t do any work for the Sponsorship Program, and as his upcoming testimony will show, he burnt his bridges at the Liberal Party well before Jean Brault alleges that Wajsmann was present at a cash drop (which reporters mistakenly attributes as an accusation that he took a payoff, which isn’t what Brault said at all, according to Beryl). He does give an insider’s look at some of the players involved in the scandal, though, including Martin, Alfonse Gagliano, and Daniel Dezainde, who he called a “racist f**k”. He also gives his own unique analysis of Canadian politics and talks about his plans for the future.

Wajsmann first came to the attention of Captain’s Quarters when he left a comment at the site, that Morrissey then extracted and featured as a post.
update – a commentor mentioned this essay by Mr. Wajsman. This is a man who has significant observations about the ��r�seau Lib�ral ��

Via reader email – Canada Free Press has “never-seen-before film footage taking you back to January 3, 2005 when Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and his entourage made an official visit to tsunami-ravaged Sir Lanka.”

Included in the Jan. 3 entourage were Martin’s wife, Sheila, PMO staff, Jack Layton, leader of Canada’s fourth party, the New Democrat Party, RCMP, and a handful of Canadian journalists, including the CBC.
The film footage was shot by award-winning Canadian documentary journalist, Garth Pritchard, who was on the scene prior to Martin’s visit at the invitation of Canada’s mercy mission DART team.
You will hear how an RCMP officer tried to relieve Pritchard of his camera. Pritchard’s voice can easily be picked up when he tells the officer that, “This is not Canada, this is Sri Lanka.”
[…]
See for yourself how the film footage shows the padre being pushed aside and how overzealous members of the Martin entourage physically knock a Sri Lankan mourner to the ground – without apology.
Ostensibly, the Prime Minister’s official visit to tsunami-ravaged Sri Lanka was about Canadian compassion.
See and hear for yourself how he shills the purified water of Zenon Environmental Inc., an Oakville-based company of which his lifetime mentor Maurice Strong is a board member.
See and hear some of the film highlights, including Padre Hardwick trying to do the job he was asked to do: namely honouring the dead. Padre Hardwick calls for a Moment of Silence. Fifteen seconds into the Moment of Silence, Prime Minister Martin ends it, saying, “Let’s go.”

I can’t play this on my computer – so haven’t yet watched it. Let me know what you think in the comments.
Video is here. It’s a 25 meg file, so you’ll need hispeed.

Politics Watch is reporting on the Corbeil testimony, and the Paul Martin camp makes another appearance.

The former director of the Quebec wing of the federal Liberal party testified at the Gomery inquiry Monday that he paid nine party staff members and officials $50,000 in cash stuffed in envelopes shortly before the 2000 federal election.
[…]
Also shortly before the election, Corbeil testified that he made two additional trips to Brault’s office where he picked up two separate large yellow postal envelopes containing $35,000 and $15,000 in $100 bills.�
On both visits, Corbeil said he counted the cash before leaving Brault’s office.� He later returned back to the Liberal Party headquarters.�
“I came to my office and I divided it up,” he testified.�
Corbeil said he put the cash in nine separate envelopes for various party workers.
At that point in his testimony, Corbeil grabbed a piece of paper with the names of those he handed envelopes to and hesitated.�
Justice John Gomery asked Corbeil to provide the names of the recipients.�
“Commissioner, you know I lost my job,” Corbeil said to Gomery.
“Mr. Corbeil, you’re not the only one,” Gomery said. “You’re one of a group of people who have dealt with the very negative consequences because of having to tell the truth and we are making a request of you.”
Corbeil then testified that he gave Daniel Dezainde, who was an official in the office of then prime minister Jean Chretien, two envelopes – one with $3,000 for Dezainde and another with $2,000 for a woman who was a friend of Dezainde.�
He also said he gave Richard Mimeau, a known supporter of Paul Martin, an envelope containing $6,000 to reimburse him for travel expenses.�

Corbeil is naming names. Among them is Liberal MP Denis Coderre – and it’s not the first time.

Brault said that Gagliano crony Joe Morselli told him he could “solve potential problems” and “talk to Denis” – meaning Liberal cabinet minister Denis Coderre, who also served under Martin.”

I presume the Prime MInister will be before the press by sundown, to turf Coderre from the party to uphold that “moral authority to govern” he informed us of a few weeks ago.
update – Ed Morrissey has relevant exerpts from a Globe and Mail report.

Paul Martin is in bed with the Separatists.

Well, congratulations to Ralph Goodale. In his few short months as finance minister, the innovation he has brought to the fiscal management of the Canadian treasury signal that, like the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Federal Budget is a “living document”.
After breaking new ground with the introduction of the Buzz Hargrove Paper Napkin Motel Room Amending Process, and giving the green light for nearly 6 billion in seed money for the new Department of Buying Off Ontario*, Ralph Goodale has created, with the approval of his Prime Minister, the “Government Of Canada Perpetual Liberal Re-Election Slush Fund.
Terence Corcoran in the National Post, explains;

Never Before has a Canadian government given itself such freewheeling fiscal elbow room. Certainly Don Drummond, former finance official and now chief economist at TD Financial, has never seen anything like it — a $4.5-billion slush fund that government can dip into at will. “For years government has wanted an instrument that would allow it to allocate spending without having to say what it’s for. This act will do it.”
Readers can check out this blank-cheque spending legislation below. Here’s how it works. Sometime in August, 2007, the federal government will check the final numbers from fiscal year 2005-6. If there’s more than a $2-billion surplus, that extra money above $2-billion can be spent. For example, if the surplus is $5-billion, the first $2-billion will be used to pay down debt, but the remaining $3-billion must be spent on the grab bag of unspecified areas. Same thing the following year.
As Don Drummond put it yesterday, this is the first time Ottawa has been able to “define the money before it defines the program.” The Layton list, sprawling over a dozen broad issues — environment, housing, transit, training programs, foreign aid, energy, education, aboriginal, tuition fees — is an open field. Not only are there no programs, Ottawa doesn’t even have a jurisdictional outlet for tuition fees, for example. (Oddly missing from the list is a $100-million union pension fund bailout, mentioned in earlier news leaks.)
Just to be doubly safe that the government’s ability to spend freely without parliamentary approval will be protected in future, Mr. Goodale threw in a clause giving the Cabinet power to “specify the particular purposes for which payments referred to in subsection (1) may be made and the amounts of those payments for the relevant fiscal year.”
In a brief news release, Mr. Goodale called all this “new investments” that build on the “fiscally responsible manner” Ottawa is spending money. Here’s how it works: Ottawa spends what it gets, when and how it wants, without parliamentary approval.

Librano Ralphie just taken the “lessons learned” through the experience gained in Sponsorship, and applied it to the federal budget. Simple? Simple.
Bruce Gottfred has more.

Beryl Wajsmann left a lengthy comment at Captain Ed’s and he’s republished it. Wajsmann is scheduled to appear before Gomery and is president of the Institute for Public Affairs of Montreal. It provides some insight into the relationship between the federal and Quebec wings of the party, and divisions within.

I specifically want to share some comments with you on Michel Beliveau’s testimony Friday at the Gomery Commission about a certain PMO meeting that occurred in 2001, and give you a heads-up on some of my upcoming testimony. Some news stories have reported that the meeting concerned “hidden” fundraising. That is not what Beliveau said. He testified that the meeting was held because the new LPC (Q) director-general Daniel Dezainde complained that I was not respecting his authority and freezing him out. The chain of command if you like. This is all in the record.
Just to set the matter straight, this was an incident I have spoken about many times. It is not new, and I addressed it in a Le Devoir article. But some reports still got the facts wrong.
Dezainde�s claims were utter nonsense. I briefed him regularly on all the work of our cultural communities� sectoral financing project. He simply wanted it shut down. Part of the reason was due to the fact that Gagliano had opposed his nomination as director-general in Quebec and Dezainde was doing everything to take complete control of the LPC (Q) headquarters.
It is always frustrating having to sit on evidence and wait to testify. I’ve been waiting to tell this story for four years. We knew about the PMO meeting in 2001. Percy Downe was new to his job as Chief of Staff to Chr�tien. Dezainde had just come in. The whole power structure had changed in two months and no one in the PMO or the party had the basic decency to call me, Benoit Corbeil or Joe Morselli to hear what we had to say. It was a set up. When I demanded from Gagliano that he set up a meeting for me with Chr�tien – that my 25 years of public involvement warranted that minimum courtesy – he refused and asked me to just keep working and be patient and let him handle Dezainde. I told him then his fecklessness would be his undoing. I still cannot forgive him that lack of courage.

Read the rest.

A couple of days ago Ezra Levant kindly emailed me a copy of some of the published reaction to the “Libranos contraversy”. It’s relatively long, so I’ve put it in the extended entry for those of you like me, who don’t subscribe to half the newspapers in the country.

Continue reading →

Paul Martin signaled Thursday that Canadians will pay whatever price necessary to keep his corrupt Liberal government in power. With pre-election bribery of the cities and other useful fools at over $8 billion and rising, Martin is now promising to send the Canadian Armed Forces into harms way to corral David Kilgour’s vote. CBC:

The head of Canada’s military returned recently from meeting with leaders of the African Union peacekeeping force that Canadian units would support.
“This is a complex and relatively dangerous environment,” Gen. Rick Hillier told CBC News. Hillier said he has more than 30 officers working on the project but was mum on the specifics until he presents several options this week to Defence Minister Bill Graham. The minister wants military intervention to be only one part of an overall plan for the northeastern African country.
“We cannot invade Sudan. It requires United Nations action … it requires political as well as military and aid matters,” Graham told CBC.

“We cannot invade Sudan”.
I’ll allow the Monty Pythonesque absurdity of that disclaimer sink in for a moment…

The two-year-old Darfur conflict, stemming from the fallout of a peace deal to end the country’s decades-old civil war, has driven about two million people from their villages to live in camps and killed 300,000 others.

“Stemming from the fallout of a peace deal”. Well, that’s putting a shine on things. Let’s take a closer look at Sudan, courtesy of the BBC; Sudanese demand death for editor:

Angry crowds have demanded the death penalty for a Sudanese newspaper editor over an article allegedly questioning the parentage of the Prophet Muhammad. Hundreds of people waving banners and chanting “God is great” protested outside a court as Mohamed Taha Mohamed Ahmed was charged over the article.
[…]
Ali Shumi, the head of Sudan’s Press Council, said the article insulted the Prophet Muhammad. He denied the charges were an assault on press freedom.
“Freedom of the press stops when it comes to respect for religions. Not just for Islam – if you said the same things about Jesus there would be the same punishment,” he said.

Renouncing Islam in the Sudan carries the death penalty. I don’t know what the consequences are for painting over a concrete stain bearing the image of the Virgin Mary .

Khartoum has been governed by strict Islamic Sharia law since 1983 – but our correspondent says that in recent years courts have shown a degree of flexibility in their interpretations of Islamic law.
The introduction of Sharia exacerbated a rebellion that had begun in the south earlier that year. The war officially ended with a peace agreement in December.

Martin won’t allow Canadian troops into Iraq to support a post-war fledgling democracy, but he’ll send them into Sudan to prop up a post-democratic dictatorship in Canada.
So, get out your scorecards. Now that Buzz Hargrove is Finance Motel Minister, and Kilgour is in charge of Foreign Affairs, Chuck Cadman should step up and take aim at the Defense portfolio.
If the independant MP from British Columbia is a clever scamp, he’ll announce to waiting reporters that he can support the Paul Martin Liberals – if he reverses the government’s position on Canadian participation in Ballistic Missile Defense.

Benoit Corbeil is the next batter up. What he is expected to testify to may explain the desperation of the Libranos to prevent an immediate election call.
Via Greg Staples

By way of a commentor and Damian Penny at the Shotgun, CTV News is confirming that the Paul Martin Liberal Party will shortly announce that the Twelve Year Program begun under Jean Chretien to transform Canada into a full fledged Banana Repubic is nearing completion;

The Conservatives won a battle Thursday in their effort to force a non- confidence vote against the Liberal minority government, but it appears they could yet lose the war.
Minutes after the Tories won the right to proceed with an amendment later this month calling on the government to resign, the Liberals said they will simply ignore the call.
By tradition, the government must step down if it loses a vote on a money bill, such as the federal budget, but it’s not clear if the Tory amendment falls under that category.
The Speaker of the House of Commons ruled Thursday that the amendment, to a finance committee bill, was in order. That appeared to clear the way for a vote on the matter in about two weeks.
The Tories hold that if they win the vote, it requires the government to resign and call an election.
Not so fast, said government House leader Tony Valeri. He said the Liberals will refuse to recognize the amendment as a confidence motion and keep governing.

I speculated that the reason the Liberals have methodically eroded the Canadian Armed Forces, was to prevent the last hope of Canadians to remove them from power by military coup.
And people thought I was joking.

A Liberal party official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, revealed that the Liberal Party of Canada has chosen the Johnny Cash classic, “A Boy Named Sue”, as their campaign theme song.

Ezra Levant took on Joe Volpe on CTV last night.
Click on “Mike Duffy” and then the appropriate link under “related video”, and watch Joe Volpe claim he was talking about a different Klan…
Direct link here, thanks to Stephen Taylor.

With the publication ban finally lifted on testimony by chief Adscam mechanic, Chuck Guite before the Gomery Inquiry, the first direct connections have been drawn to both former PM Jean Chretien and current PM Paul Martin (then Canada’s Finance Minister.

CG: Because I met with Mr. Gagliano. �
ROY: What exactly did you tell him and what did you get by way of an answer?
CG: I told him what was happening, and I wanted assurance that the volume of business that V&B had from the government would be maintained. We probably talked about it and so forth, and he said �I will look after that.� So I don�t — if he spoke to Mr. Manley — I think he was at Tourism then —
ROY: He was responsible for Tourism Canada —
CG: — and the Bank —
ROY: — as Minister of Industry.
CG: And I think Mr. Martin was at the Bank at that time.
ROY: In 2000?
CG: Yes, I would think so.
ROY: He was Minister of Finance?
CG: Minister of Finance.
ROY: Yes.
CG: And I got a call from Pierre Tremblay about a week later.
ROY: Saying what?
CG: Saying that �It will be done.�
ROY: What will be done?
CG: The interfe — I don�t want to use that word — the Minister had spoken to both ministers and the volume of business would be maintained

Much, much more at Andrew Coyne. I’ve linked to the main page, as he has multiple posts – one which points out that the government owned CBC is not mentioning the Martin “smoking gun”. Most curious – unless one is aware of the tight group of Liberal patronage appointees on the corporation’s board.
This isn’t the first time Martin has been accused of interfering in advertising contracts in favour of Martin-friendly firms, though the Earnscliffe case falls outside the limited terms of reference for the Gomery Inquiry.
For his part, Paul Martin’s office has issued a blanket denial – and off to Holland he goes, in a reversal of an earlier decision not to attend VE Day ceremonies.
In a final twist, the company mentioned in the Guite testimony – Vickers and Benson – has tangled ties to the Canadian owned Power Corporation of BNP Paribas, Oil-For-Food, Maurice Strong, Paul Vocker, Jean Cretien, Paul Martin connections.
Woohoo!

It is clear however that Vickers & Benson contributed $93,852.44 from 1993 to 2003 to the Liberal Party, including a whopping $13,933.40 in 2000, the year of the sale. John Hayter, the chairman and CEO, donated $1000 in 2000 as well.