Hey Yankees! You’ve no right to run your own border

Lordy but Canadians can be two-faced. The end of nice piece by Matt Gurney at the National Post’s “Full Comment”:

…
The Americans can’t possibly win, not when they’re dealing with a neighbour that wants to be 100% on board and completely distinct at the same time. If they want to charge us a few bucks when we fly into Vegas or catch a few rays in Florida, a fee they charge virtually every other nation in the world, we shouldn’t get too upset. If we want to be a sovereign nation, we should happily put our $5.50 where our mouths are.

As for not winning, here’s a truly scarifying headline in the Crvena Zvezda:

U.S. deserves ‘total control’ of northern border: lawmaker

At first glance I took that to mean that damn Yankee was demanding control of the Canadian side too; I suspect that was the intent of the Star headline writer. Whereas in fact it’s just about the US side. Where Americans have every right to do whatever they want. They have their sovereignty too; Canadians have no right to get exquisitely exercised when they actually choose to use it.
We are too often such cheesy have-cake-and-eaters.

Reader Tips

in tonight’s Tips accompaniment we take a look at what is almost certainly the most famous sound effect in film history: the Wilhelm Scream. Named after a character in the 1953 film “Charge at Feather River” who screams this panic-stricken, almost girly scream after being struck by an arrow, the audio sample was actually first used in the 1951 film “Distant Drums” by a character who is being killed by an alligator. Over the last sixty years, the scream has been reprised literally hundreds of times, in a host of movies and TV shows; according to some in the industry, it’s a kind of an in-joke and a way to say hello to other technical production crews on other shoots. For your amusement, here’s a compilation of movie scenes in which the Wilhelm Scream is used, and, as a special bonus, here’s a handy button that generates the Wilhelm Scream with a simple mouse-click. Just in case you ever need it.
The comments are open for your Reader Tips.

“The Complete Stupidity of the Western Left”

Mark Steyn joins the boys at Ricochet for a lively discussion about current events. Here’s the show summary:

Our old pal Mark Steyn returns for a rollicking podcast where we cover everything from Egypt to Ireland’s boom to Rob’s sexual harassment class. Then, Sally Zelikovsky — who has the unenviable job of heading up the San Francisco Tea Party — joins to tell us how she spends her time deep behind enemy lines. We wrap things up with conversation that winds from Chet Baker to Charlie Sheen that details the actor’s unique stimulus plan for shoring up falling home values. Two words: Porn House.

“Apres moi, le déluge”

Pace Inimitable Ibbitson of the Globe (a fellow who truly loathes non-metropolitan Canada, must be a reaction to growing up in small-town Gravenhurst, Ontario), Publius destroys multiculti in a superb essay–a few excerpts, do read it all (hint: Pierre Trudeau was not the fons et origo of all our woes):

As regular readers will have noticed, this blog has dedicate a fair number of electrons in recent weeks to multiculturalism. We are at the beginning stages in Canada of a cultural war, between those seeking to maintain the Big Lie of multiculturalism, and those seeking to defend Canadian culture and tradition. The former is – at best – a dangerously naive idea that all cultures are of equal objective value. The latter is a system of values that upholds individual rights, separation of church and state, free speech, rule of law and a basic market economy.
What is going on in Canada is only one small episode in a wider struggle across the western world. It is as if, on its deathbed, the nations of Europe and North America began to question the path that had lead them hence. In Germany, France and Britain there have been official rebukes to multiculturalism. So far these have only been pro forma declarations of what the general public had already come to understand, but was often afraid to say openly.
It will take decades of fighting to remove multiculturalism, and its fountainhead moral relativism, from the sinews of western nations…
What began as a plea for those most western of values, equality before the law and objectivity, is now ending, decades later, in the quagmire of affirmative action, and calls for Sharia law being supported by the Archbishop of Canterbury. There was a subtle shift in the justification for our immigration policies. Instead of trying to seek out the best immigrants for Canada, our policies transformed themselves into a quest to remake Canadian society. There was nothing special about Canada or the Canadian way. We were just another country. Our values were not better than anyone else’s values. Discrimination on the basis of cultural values, then, was no different than discrimination on racial grounds.
The philosophical idea at the heart of multiculturalism is relativism. It is a complete rejection of objectivity. There is no truth in this view. No right and wrong…
Once enough of the western ruling class had accepted the idea that objectivity was impossible, that all values were subjective to the individual or perhaps a particular group, the West became deaf and dumb. It could not object to barbarism abroad (a foreign policy based on appeasement), or barbarism at home (immigrants from primitive cultures unwilling to integrate). Faced with crises after crises, the West’s response has been apology and retreat…
…It’s easy enough to say that all cultures are equal, if you live in an area surrounded by civilized men and women. Just like it’s easier to be a socialist if you’re rich [that means you, Jack and Olivia]. You don’t pay the price. Someone else does, usually the poor and the middle class, or the generations that follow…

Update: More from Publius along similar lines:

The WASP Suicides

Notice a Pattern?

Is it just my imagination, or is there a pattern here:
John Ibbitson: “Debating multiculturalism gives a voice to the angry, the frustrated and yes, the bigoted. It makes newer Canadians feel less welcome.”
Barbara Kay: “Last Thursday, environmentalist guru David Suzuki stormed out of a Toronto AM640 radio interview with host John Oakley because Oakley dared to suggest that global warming might not be the “totally settled issue” Suzuki insisted it was . . . Suzuki’s very public censure of Oakley for his perceived blasphemy is disquieting because it smacks of the totalitarian impulse to silence and humiliate the dissenter –or even, as in this case, the dissenter’s messenger.”
Michael McBane, Canadian Health Coalition: “[Canadians] have told us they flat-out reject Dr. Ouellet’s proposal to provide us with American-style, two-tier medicine.”
Might there be a connection between the fact that so many Canadians have tuned out of political debate in our country and that one side continuously says there’s nothing left to discuss?
Update: And now Avaaz.org is trying to stifle Sun TV News, or as they call their campaign, “48 hours to save Canadian journalism“.

But everyone says we should suck up to China

Loads of people here go spare at the mere mention of any possible Canadian link to torture in Afstan. So where are the howls of outrage when our government itself says the things below?

Man who could face execution in China loses deportation fight
…federal Crown counsel Kristina Dragaitis assured Judge Boivin on Tuesday that China can be trusted to try Mr. Zeng only on the charge of contract fraud he is currently facing. She said that a stiff prison sentence is the worst punishment he would face.
“To suggest they might be cute about it and use a low offence to avoid all the kafuffle about penalties is purely speculative,” Ms. Dragaitis added.
Ms. Dragaitis conceded that Chinese authorities sometimes use torture to extract confessions, but she said that their targets are usually members of religious groups, such as the Falun Gong. As a person accused of an economic crime, she said, Mr. Zeng need not fear similar treatment.
“The applicant doesn’t fit the profile of people who are tortured by security forces,” Ms. Dragaitis added. “I don’t think anyone can say there is no chance of torture, but the issue is whether it’s more likely or not.”..

More here on another country that also brings out the best in Canadian hypocrisy:

Corruption? What stinking corruption? And what stinking torture?

Juan For The Money

Now is the time at SDA when we juxtapose!
NPR CEO Vivian Schiller, October 2010 – “There’s a misperception about federal funding and public radio. There’s the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. They receive $90 million a year and a vast majority goes to member public radio stations. Those stations pull in more than $1 billion collectively a year. It’s significant and important but not even close to the lion’s share of revenues for public radio.”
NPR CEO Vivian Schiller, February, 2011 – “The elimination of federal funding would be a significant blow to nearly 900 public radio stations that serve the needs of more than 38 million Americans with free over-the-air programming they can’t find anywhere else.”
h/t POWinCA

Reader Tips

A lot of First World tourists who holiday in tropical paradises think they have a license to drink excessively and behave like out of control toddlers. In tonight’s video, a legless tourist behaves highly inappropriately in a bar in Las Palmas. It’s funnier than it sounds…
The comments are open for your Reader Tips.

Tommy Douglas: Not Dead Enough!

Canadian Health Care Network; (behind subscription wall).

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan has undertaken a historical review of complaints of sexual misconduct by physicians licensed in the province and come to a startling finding: the vast majority of cases involved international medical graduates (IMGs).
The review was conducted by associate registrar Bryan Salte at the request of the college council in the fall. Dated December 13 and only made public at the council’s February meeting, a copy of the four-page memorandum was provided to the Medical Post.
He looked at the college’s records back to 1984, but Salte wrote in the report that he was able to search all complaints of unprofessional misconduct back to 2004. Before that date records only contained details of penalty decisions in which a physician had been found guilty of unprofessional conduct, or had admitted to unprofessional conduct.
He also cautioned “the range of sexual misconduct complaints is not identified” and “there is no breakdown by severity of the conduct alleged. Thus a complaint of inappropriate sexual questioning, and a complaint of attempted sexual stimulation of a patient will both be reported as complaints of sexual misconduct.”
He acknowledged that Saskatchewan has a very-high ratio of IMGs, saying “slightly more than 50% of Saskatchewan physicians for the period reviewed are IMGs.” He added that: “If there is an equal distribution of complaints against IMGs and physicians whose medical degrees were obtained in Canada, one would expect that about half of the complaints would be filed against physicians from each group.”

Sexual complaints 1984 to 2010
Year Range       IMG     Domestic Graduate
2006-2010        38      3
2001-2005        27      1
1996-2000         5       0
1991-1995         6       0
1985-1990         8       0

h/t Manny from Moncton

“Flip followed by flop followed by flip”

A Niall Ferguson smackdown.

h/t Ward
Nic Robertson’s 0-for-2: “Well, my message to President Obama is just, “We started this revolution without any outside help, and we are going to finish it also without any outside help.” (h/t Lev)
You say you want a revolution?

Another consistent feature is that revolutions take place, not in the most repressive of tyrannies, but more typically in despotisms whose grip is already loosening, and where both a degree of economic prosperity and liberalization are already taking place. The administration of Louis XVI was the most liberal and reformist ever known in France; it attempted to introduce a free market system and break the economic hold of the aristocracy over the masses. Similarly, Tsar Nicholas II alternated between harsh repression and encouraging the Duma to share power with the crown; during his reign, the Russian economy was one of the fastest growing in Europe, reaching levels in agricultural production that Nikita Krushchev conceded in 1956 had still not been equaled.
In the case of Egypt under Mubarak, the outbreak against his rule was preceded by a period in which modest progress was being made in Egypt’s economic prospects and standard of living, due to a small amount of oil, a lot of tourism, and increasing foreign investment. This year the economy grew by a robust 6%. Ditto in Iran, where the Shah was committed to political and economic Westernization and secularization. Ditto in Russia, where Gorbachev’s toppling of the Soviet regime was preceded by the Brezhnev era in which Russians were finally tasting some solid economic benefits.
Common to these cases is Toqueville’s thesis of the revolution of rising expectations. Fitful and semi-effective autocratic reformers whet people’s hopes for a better future, but cannot satisfy the expectations they arouse. Their own semi-effective reforms unleash the forces that overthrow them. Then the liberal reform regime is in turn swept away by the true revolutionaries, who do not want a liberal “bourgeois” revolution like the American revolution, but want to revoke both traditional authority and the half-completed modernization in favor of a populist collective.
During the flash point that signals the downfall of the autocrat, there is often a moment of truth when it becomes clear that the autocrat’s own allies, especially the military, will not take the extreme measures necessary to crush the revolt, and tell the autocrat they will not fire on the people. This happened with Louis XVI, the Tsar and the Shah. In the case of Gorbachev, he himself refused to use the Soviet military and security services to halt the out-of-control pace of his own reforms. And now Mubarak, whose generals told him the same thing, finally easing him out. In contrast, determined tyrannies like the Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin will methodically kill tens of thousands of people until rebellion is crushed (for example., the Kronstadt rebellion). Currently, Syria exudes the silence of the grave as popular uprisings flair nearby, a sign of how grimly effective its tyranny is. And, since there is no television footage, no one calls for the demise of this far more lethal regime.

Navigation