Son of Pierre

The Liberals say “Yes!” to human smuggling:

Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s call for opposition politicians to back his plan to crack down on human smuggling is being met with a flat ‘no’.

“No amount of photo ops by the PM will make me – or any other Liberal MP – vote for a bill that is ineffective, unconstitutional, and just plain wrong,” Liberal immigration critic Justin Trudeau told QMI Agency.

NDP MP Olivia Chow chimed in with this fragment of logic:

“I thought the PM Harper was concerned about the economic well being of Canadians, and (bill) C-49 will not add a single penny to seniors’ pension.”

h/t batb
(CORRECTION: The first version of this post incorrectly stated that Justin Trudeau, and not Olivia Chow, made the latter statement. My apologies. The attribution is now correct.)

The curse of Holden Caulfield

Little did J.D. Salinger know what he would wreak. Excerpts from a delightful essay by Clark Whelton in City Journal:

What Happens in Vagueness Stays in Vagueness
The decline and fall of American English, and stuff
I recently watched a television program in which a woman described a baby squirrel that she had found in her yard. “And he was like, you know, ‘Helloooo, what are you looking at?’ and stuff, and I’m like, you know, ‘Can I, like, pick you up?,’ and he goes, like, ‘Brrrp brrrp brrrp,’ and I’m like, you know, ‘Whoa, that is so wow!’ ” She rambled on, speaking in self-quotations, sound effects, and other vocabulary substitutes, punctuating her sentences with facial tics and lateral eye shifts. All the while, however, she never said anything specific about her encounter with the squirrel.
Uh-oh. It was a classic case of Vagueness, the linguistic virus that infected spoken language in the late twentieth century…
In 1988, my elder daughter graduated from Vassar. During a commencement reception, I asked one of her professors if he’d noticed any change in Vassar students’ language skills. “The biggest difference,” he replied, “is that by the time today’s students arrive on campus, they’ve been juvenilized. You can hear it in the way they talk. There seems to be a reduced capacity for abstract thought.” He went on to say that immature speech patterns used to be drummed out of kids in ninth grade. “Today, whatever way kids communicate seems to be fine with their high school teachers.” Where, I wonder, did Vagueness begin? It must have originated before the 1980s….All the way back in 1951, Holden Caulfield spoke proto-Vagueness (“I sort of landed on my side . . . my arm sort of hurt”), complete with double-clutching (“Finally, what I decided I’d do, I decided I’d . . .”) and demonstrative adjectives used as indefinite articles (“I felt sort of hungry so I went in this drugstore . . .”)…

Via Arts & Letters Daily. The estimable Theodore Dalrymple writes frequently for City Journal.

Kiwi’s Shaken, Not stirred

Fox:

Troops were deployed to help people get out and to throw up a security cordon around the stricken area, and residents throughout the city were urged to stay home or with neighbors and conserve water and food.
(…)
During hours of chaos in the city, people dug through rubble with their hands to free people trapped. Firefighters climbed extension ladders to pluck people stranded on roofs to safety. A crane lifted a team of rescuers on a platform to one group of survivors in a high-rise.
(…)
Officials had established relief centers in schools and community halls, where food was being served to thousands of sheltering people and donated blankets were being handed out. In at least one park in the city, people — many of them tourists who had abandoned their hotels — huddled in hastily pitched tents and under plastic sheeting. The Red Cross was working to secure accommodation for them.

Culture matters.

Mathematically Challenged “Progressives”

A friend of a friend posted the following on Facebook:

Are you sick of highly paid teachers?
Teachers’ hefty salaries are driving up taxes, and they only work 9 or 10 months a year! It’s time we put things in perspective and pay them for what they do – babysit! We can get that for less than minimum wage. That’s right. Let’s give them $3.00 an hour and only the hours they worked; not any of that silly planning time, or any time they spend before or after school. That would be $19.50 a day (7:45 to 3:00 PM with 45 min. off for lunch and plan– that equals 6 1/2 hours). Each parent should pay $19.50 a day for these teachers to baby-sit their children. Now how many students do they teach in a day…maybe 30? So that’s $19.50 x 30 = $585.00 a day. However, remember they only work 180 days a year!!! I am not going to pay them for any vacations.
LET’S SEE….
That’s $585 X 180= $105,300 per year. (Hold on! My calculator needs new batteries). What about those special education teachers and the ones with Master’s degrees? Well, we could pay them minimum wage ($7.75), and just to be fair, round it off to $8.00 an hour. That would be $8 X 6 1/2 hours X 30 children X 180 days = $280,800 per year. Wait a minute — there’s something wrong here! There sure is! The average teacher’s salary (nationwide) is $50,000. $50,000/180 days = $277.77/per day/30 students=$9.25/6.5 hours = $1.42 per hour per student–a very inexpensive baby-sitter and they even EDUCATE your kids!) WHAT A DEAL!!!!
Make a teacher smile; repost this to show appreciation for all educators.

Continue reading →

Sourcing the scoop

Journalist, Ottawa insider, and prophesier Susan Delacourt:

“This is the week where we find out whether the controversy over Bev Oda is a big deal or not a big deal…”

Holy smokes – we’ll find out this week. So how, exactly, will the journalists who write the headlines “find out”?

“If it lingers in the headlines over the parliamentary break, conventional wisdom has it, then this minister will be gone…”

La vérité

In an amusing exchange in the comments to J.P. Friere’s article at the Washington Examiner about the Wisconsin impasse, someone named “Holyshiiite” wrote reprovingly,

“Union members ARE taxpayers, you freakin’ idiots.”

“Sistersuzey” deftly clarified the matter:

“They are payed with our tax dollars in the first place, so the taxes they pay are payed with our tax dollars. So basically we are paying their taxes for them.”

1989 vs 2011

Comparing Communist Europe (USSR excluded) with the Arab world. In 1989 those living in European Communist countries had a clear and attractive alternative to their regimes: Western European social democracy of various types, an alternative that from any rational, moral, economic and indeed emotional view (hard-core believing Communists excepted but they no longer dwelled in that part of the world) was obviously superior to present realities.
The wave of popular unrest now moving around the Arab world has, to use the obvious phrase, uncanny similarities in the underlying sameness of repressive conditions being rebelled against. Could Libya be the new Romania?
What is strikingly different is the absence of an obvious alternative model for government, economy and society in Arab countries. Where is the Arab EU model? As for other possibilities…
Update: Anne Applebaum draws another historical comparison:

In the Arab world, it’s 1848 – not 1989

Tavis Smiley is a Cultural Relativist Nitwit

PBS talk show host, Tavis Smiley, recently appeared on Bill Maher’s show. An interesting discussion ensued between these two Men of the Left about Cultural Relativism.
Cultural Relativism is one of the prime tenets of Multiculturalism, which is under attack in Europe these days. In a nutshell, belief in it means that you may not criticize or look down upon any other culture. Whether it be the repression of women or female genital mutilation or the execution of homosexuals (for just being gay), an adherent to Cultural Relativism will not criticize any of these things and considers anyone who does a bigot & a racist.
While Bill Maher is most certainly a Man of the Left, he is absolutely not a Cultural Relativist, but Tavis Smiley is, big time. Here’s an outline of Smiley and his views:

Smiley’s positions epitomize what happens when one mixes the tenets of moral and cultural relativism, cultural self-hate, postmodernism, and political correctness. I have often argued that tolerance toward any form of intolerance is self-inflicted barbarism. Bill Maher captured my position quite well on his most recent show when he stated, “When you tolerate intolerance, you’re not really being a liberal.”

Though I could not find a video of this exchange, comedian Adam Carolla obliterates Smiley in this podcast, beginning at 10:30. Language warning!
On a personal note, I must admit that I was not aware of this division of opinion amongst Leftists on this issue. Perhaps it serves as a good litmus test to determine if a person is Centre Left or Far Left. The former is home to the likes of Terry Glavin, Michael Ignatieff, Joe Clark, etc. The latter is home to Jack Layton, everyone in the Green Party, all SDA trolls, etc.

Did Lizzie May Recently Hit Her Head?

With apologies to all poetry purists:
Lizzie May sat behind a green wall,
When a big truck caused it to fall.
Onto her head the wall did fall down,
Which caused Lizzie May a great big frown.
The socialist doctors did their very best,
Albeit after two weeks of helping all the rest.
They fixed her head as best they could tell,
But clearly Lizzie May is not at all well.

Like you, I never heard any report about Lizzie May being in her office when the truck hit it, but then how do you explain this?

Navigation