When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal

Mat Margolis;

The picture of the Biden administration’s weaponization of federal law enforcement keeps getting uglier. New records that Judicial Watch obtained reveal that the FBI’s own agents believed there was no legal basis for the Aug. 8, 2022, raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, and they said so repeatedly.

The Biden DOJ didn’t care.

We know that then-Attorney General Merrick Garland personally signed off on the raid. But the agents actually doing the work weren’t on board. A July 13, 2022, email from the Washington Field Office said, “WFO does not believe (and has articulated to DOJ CES), that we have established probable cause for the search warrant at Mar a Lago. DOJ has opined that they do, requesting a wide scope including residence, office, storage space.”

The agents argued that the most efficient path to recovering any classified documents would have been cooperation with Trump’s attorney, Evan Corcoran. Instead, the DOJ buried that option and demanded a raid.

The records show FBI agents spent five weeks pushing back on the probable cause question, time they said was “counterproductive” to the stated goal of protecting classified information.

No Man Left Behind

@Geiger_Capital

This movie is going to be insane…

American WSO ejects over Iran and spends ~48 hours hiding in the mountains while the IRGC hunts him. We cover him with 24/7 air support until US Special Ops can get to him, only for their Plan A planes to get stuck on the rural airstrip we setup deep in Iranian territory. They blow up the planes so Iran can’t recover them, fly in 3 new ones for extract, and still manage to get everyone home alive.

No man left behind. 🇺🇸

New York Post has the details.

Update: Glenn Reynolds speculates.

Muslim Values Are Canadian Values

I know we all remember the armed police presence during the Easters of our childhoods.

New Governor, Same As The Old Governor

Western Standard;

Retired Lt. Colonel David Redman, former head of Alberta’s emergency management, has accused federal authorities of the intentional erosion of Canada’s national security apparatus over the past 11 years.

“To go from calling China the largest strategic threat to Canada one year ago and now calling it a very significant strategic partner is a completely intentional act. You can’t say it’s not. And so from my point of view, each of the steps in the degradation of Canada’s 10 elements of national security have been thought through and are intentional.”

Speaking on the Hannaford show, Redman outlined the “purposeful destruction” of agencies responsible for geopolitical analysis, intelligence services, border controls, immigration policy, and policing. He argued this was not the result of negligence or misplaced priorities under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, but deliberate acts aimed at weakening national unity and validating the prime minister’s understanding of Canada as a “post-national state.”

He said they have been “intentionally destroyed or reduced in capability,” to erode Canada’s ability to defend its culture, values, and sovereignty. Redman drew parallels to policies under Pierre Elliott Trudeau, suggesting his son continues a similar agenda by prioritizing global interests over national ones.

“When you bring in people who do not share your common interests and values,” he said, “it’s an intentional act to break the unity.”

Are We Still A Member Of This Thing?

The first rule of fishing is fish where the fish are;

The chief oversight body responsible for tracking U.S. foreign assistance says United Nations agencies are stonewalling a probe into their ties to Hamas. The agencies have failed to provide investigators with information that could identify their employees as affiliates of the terror group, according to a non-public report transmitted to Congress and obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

I, For One, Welcome Our New Self-Driving Overlords

Road & Track;

Currently, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and U.S. Department of Transportation do not heavily regulate SAE Level 2 semi-autonomous driving systems. Similarly, there is no federal requirement for vehicles using L2 semi-autonomous setups to record data during crashes. This means most automakers can’t comply with the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration’s standing general order to provide certain data following crashes involving L2-operating vehicles, which leaves federal safety regulators and investigators to pick up the pieces themselves after a crash.[…]

NTSB officials also questioned Ford about its BlueCruise system and speeding. The semi-autonomous system allows for intelligent adaptive cruise control up to 20 mph above the speed limit, a fact that investigators cited as a factor in the Philadelphia crash. Similarly, NTSB officials were troubled that automatic emergency braking could be disabled when using hands-free BlueCruise. When asked about the testing regimen for L2 semi-autonomous systems, Dr. Becic said most automakers do not test for the worst-case, most distracted human driver when developing L2-related driver monitoring and alerting systems.

Don’t Believe Carnival Carney

Melanie in Saskatchewan has an important message to share with the Elbows Up crowd:

To Mark Carney & Those Applauding Him:

I am a Canadian paying for a country that doesn’t include me.

I live in the part of the country your map forgets.
About 2,600 kilometres from the nearest stop on your proposed $90 billion train.

I am an overtaxed, under-served Canadian.

I heat my home with rising costs.
I fill my vehicle at almost $2 a litre, depending on the day and my luck.
I watch a country with 163 billion barrels of oil behave like it’s on a meagre allowance.

And you want me to pay for a train I will never use.

How thoughtful.

Navigation