Because as everyone knows,
a) Alcoholism is a disease. You can’t cure a disease by throwing sick people in jail.
b) You can’t legislate morality!
Truly, drunk drivers need a better press agent. There’s no other way to explain how the same people who point to reductions in drunk driving rates through enforcement and stiffer sentencing, also argue that “jail is not the answer” for the criminal drug abuser.
Witness this odd defense of “safe injection sites” by Barbara Yaffe;
– Between June of 2007 and June of 2008, 222 users overdosed at the East Hastings clinic and received immediate intervention. Some of those users might otherwise have died in a back alley.
Just as drunks die, unmourned and unexcused, in alleys and ditches every day of the year. What’s so damned special about junkies that they merit the equivalent of a taxpayer funded drunk drivers’ lane with rescue teams at the ready?
“We’re just grateful he didn’t take anyone with him”.

Finally, glimmers of rational thought. Someone in government willing to voice the obvious – “It’s the crap they’re shooting directly into their veins, stupid.”
“The supervised injection site undercuts the ethic of medical practice and sets a debilitating example for all physicians and nurses, both present and future in Canada,” he scolded in an address to the Canadian Medical Association general council meeting in Montreal.
He called providing a safe injection site to drug addicts tantamount to offering palliative care to a patient with a treatable form of cancer. […]
“Is it true that supervised injections offer ‘positive health outcomes?’ I would not put it this way. Insite [Vancouver’s safe injection site] may slow the death spiral of a deadly drug habit, but it does not reverse it. I do not regard this as a positive health outcome.”
Indeed.
And fast forward 30 years to the moment when a Canadian Prime Minister stands before Parliament to issue an official apology – and restitution – to the “Survivors of Safe Injection Sites”. It will happen. One only hopes they bankrupt the Canadian Medical Association first.
And he’s not the only one. In Saskatchewan, SDA gets results!
I do believe, however, in compromise. Simply inform those doctors and junkie advocates so utterly convinced that projects such as Insite are worth funding, that the programs will continue – so long as the injection sites are relocated to their own primary residences.
Gated communities could benefit from a little social diversity, yes?