Category: Social Disease

This Is The Time At SDA When We Zuckerpose!

New York Post, October 2021A former federal election official on Thursday called the $400 million-plus that Mark Zuckerberg spent to help finance local elections a “carefully orchestrated attempt” to influence the 2020 vote…

Reuters, July 2022Facebook-owner Meta Platforms Inc (META.O) has cut plans to hire engineers by at least 30% this year, CEO Mark Zuckerberg told employees on Thursday, as he warned them to brace for a deep economic downturn.

Good and hard.

We Prefer Government Misinformation

Partisan pollsters as well.

Angus Reid- Free Speech or Free Fall? Half in Canada say Musk buying Twitter will lead to more misinformation on the platform

There are sharp political divides on perceptions of this matter. As in the United States, where right-of-centre politicians cheered Musk’s potential acquisition, a majority (63%) of past Conservative Party voters on this side of the border believe it will be beneficial to free speech were the sale to go through. Three-quarters (74%) of past Liberal voters and seven-in-ten (70%) who voted NDP worry about the proliferation of abusive speech.

and

Two-in-five (38%) women under the age of 35 say the negative impacts of social media on their mental health is why they quit a platform. Three-in-ten (31%) men that age say the same. However, for young men, more (37%) are likely to say they didn’t agree with the content or opinions on the platform and that’s why they left:

Is it social media affecting their “mental health” or is it more like uncomfortable truths?

Related

Sword and Sorcery

At the Belmont Club.

The most singular aspect of the rise of Woke mumbo jumbo is its relationship with the astonishing technological development that sustains it; enabling what may be called a ‘sword and sorcery’ regime. Quasi-theocracies are upheld by technology so advanced it appears to be magic, at least to the general public, who have only a vague and awestruck knowledge of the mechanisms involved. “This man is woman,” a counter disinformation bureaucrat might intone, and all would nod in asset. Those in the virtual crowd who disagree will remain mute, for they know that with a gesture, the functionary can zap any dissenter with cancelation, so that he can be excluded from the metaverse entirely, through a process few understand but all fear.

Meanwhile, a former CBC columnist tugs at her strings.

Socially Awkward

After yesterday’s tell us something we already know drop by Veritas, this is more like it.

[Alex Martinez, Lead Client Partner for Twitter]: “Right now, we don’t make profit. So, I’m going to say ideology, which is what led us into not being profitable.”

Martinez on free speech: “The rest of us who have been here believe in something that’s good for the planet and not to give people free speech.”

Martinez on censorship: “People don’t know how to make a rational decision if you don’t put out — correct things that are supposed to be out in the public, right?”

Martinez on Musk: “Elon Musk as a person is whatever. I don’t, like, he’s a loony toon. He has, he has Asperger’s.”

Martinez on Musk: “He has Asperger’s… So, he’s special. We all know that. And That’s fine. So here, no wonder he’s going to say some f***ing crazy sh*t because he’s special.”

Happy job hunting.

Social Disease

Exposing Twitter as a cesspool of censorious communists is like secretly filming a highway billboard. But they did it anyway.

A senior engineer at Twitter has admitted the social media giant has a strong left-wing bias and they routinely censor conservatives.

Siru Murugesan was recorded saying the company culture is extremely far left where workers are ‘commie as f**k’ and they ‘hate, hate, hate’ Elon Musk’s $44billion takeover.

In a shockingly frank conversation, filmed over several encounters, he said the firm ‘does not believe in free speech’ and even started to turn him left-wing when he joined.

Veritas video here.

When You Lose Andrew Coyne

You really are off into the farthest corners of la la land.

Globe and Mail- What a tangled Web the Trudeau government is weaving

It was such a lovely idea, the internet. A borderless, bodiless refuge for free expression, beyond the censor’s reach; a place of infinite capacity and zero cost, where anyone who wanted to express themselves could, in whatever medium, at whatever scale; where a book or a song or a film could be distributed with equal ease, to one person or billions; where artists had the world for an audience, and audiences could choose from among all the world’s creators. Who wouldn’t want such a thing?

Governments, that’s who. The Trudeau government, in particular, seems to see the internet not as an opportunity, a chance to stand down the immense regulatory army that has hitherto stood watch over the Canadian media, but as a challenge.

Featured comment.

Navigation