The New Oxford American Dictionary defines ‘onerous’ as “involving an amount of effort and difficulty that is oppressively burdensome.”
I mention this because a news story in yesterday’s Globe & Mail began —
“The Harper government is making it more onerous for people to settle their foreign parents or grandparents in Canada…”
I used the past tense – “began” – because the loaded phrase has been scrubbed, changed from “more onerous” to “tougher” (the original lede can be seen quoted here in one of the early comments under the article).
The new requirement announced by Immigration Minister Jason Kenney “(doubles) the amount of time for which (the younger immigrants) must cover any provincial social benefits incurred by their relatives.”
Here’s the question: when someone emigrates from another country to Canada for a more prosperous life, and subsequently brings over a couple or three elderly parents/grandparents/relatives, is a requirement/agreement/arrangement, when agreed to and understood in advance, that the older relatives he brings over not use the social welfare system (i.e. not burden the taxpayers) for a designated period of time oppressively burdensome on the immigrant who is being welcomed into the country?
There are so many ways to frame any particular news story — and to change the report without any acknowledgment of having done so.