Privatization Failure

Darn.
In a letter to the editor, Mark promised me that, “The government’s decision to close down SCN is going to cost the people of Saskatchewan far more in lost investment from outside the province than was being spent to run SCN, money that was used to employ Saskatchewan labour and pay for services from Saskatchewan companies.”
So much for that. They’re even keeping the education on.
I really wanted to pay for it out of tax dollars.

A Little Wisdom from our Friends

On the topic of energy in Canada, two SDA commenters offered some pretty profound common sense wisdom that you’ll rarely see in the mainstream media:

Some myopic Canadians can’t seem to grasp that oil, gas and potash provide most of the revenue that pays for all those government benefits they believe they’re entitled to. We’re fortunate to have a government run by a Conservati­ve Party and a Prime Minister who puts Canadians first. If they don’t like that then they can move to America, a socialist paradise with a failing economy.   – – North of 60
North of 60 – you make an excellent point. And, sadly, many (most?) Canadians think that money just appears out of the ground, and have little idea where Canada would be without fossil fuels and potash. Personally, I would like to pull up to those people’s houses, disconnect the gas lines, and tell them to grow their own food. We are becoming a fundamentally unserious nation. People just don’t “get it”, and it worries me, a lot.   – – Erik Larsen

The Sound Of Settled Science

Via JoNova;

In any case, irrespective of whether you favor the global data, or the oceanic data, it is clear the the temperature with its fluctuations is inconsistent with the “high estimate” in the IPCC-FAR (and it has been the case for a decade if you take the oceanic temperature, or half a decade, if you take the global temperature, not admitting that it is biased). In fact, it appears that only the low estimate can presently be consistent with the observations. Clearly then, earth’s climate sensitivity should be revised down, and the upper range of sensitivities should be discarded and with it, the apocalyptic scenarios which they imply. For some reason, I doubt that the next AR5 report will consider this inconsistency, nor that they will revise down the climate sensitivity (and which is consistent with other empirical indicators of climate sensitivity). I am also curious when will the general public realize that the emperor has no clothes.

h/t EBD

Does Canada Belong to Canadians or to American Elitists?

SDA regular ‘bluetech’ has provided a link to this interview between PM Stephen Harper and the CBC’s Peter Mansbridge (the comments are priceless). You can also watch the interview here. After a few commercials The National will start playing. Just move the slider to 18:00.
Here’s the crux of what Harper said:

It’s one thing in terms of whether Canadians, you know, want jobs, to what degree Canadians want environmental protection. These are all valid questions.
But just because certain people in the United States would like to see Canada be one giant national park for the northern half of North America, I don’t think that’s part of what our review process is all about.

Here’s a related discussion with Ezra Levant, Jacqui Delaney, & Lorrie Goldstein:

Part 2 from Ezra’s show

Hashtag of the Entitlement Generation

The Washington Post has discovered something heretofore not known to mankind: Giving fake praise to children isn’t such a good thing!
Here’s a snippet:

A growing body of research over three decades shows that easy, unearned praise does not help students but instead interferes with significant learning opportunities.
“We used to think we could hand children self-esteem on a platter,” Stanford University psychologist Carol Dweck said. “That has backfired.”

The Costa Concordia Cruise Ship Crash: A Moral Question

“Interesting” stories are coming out of the recent ship crash off the Italian Coast:

Reports from the survivors of Concordia seem to be unanimous in condemning the failure of the crew, who are said to have shoved women and children out of the way in their anxiety to get to the boats. There were senior officers alongside Schettino who seem to have found their way safely off the ship while the passengers were left to themselves.

Beyond the fact that it was the duty of the crew to stay behind until every passenger was safely off of the ship, in 2012 is it now sexist to condemn male passengers on a ship crash for not focusing entirely on getting women & children into the lifeboats first?

Time for Helicopter Parents to Do a Rethink

Petula Dvorak has written an excellent article which should be passed along to all helicopter parents. Here’s a snippet:

[Helicopter parents] are the mothers and fathers who demanded laws for bike helmets, car seats and warning labels on every plastic bag and bucket in the universe. They had the home number of every teacher from preschool to college. And they’ve even been known to call up their grown kids’ new bosses after junior didn’t get a promotion.
But what happens when these highly groomed offspring go off and join the hundreds living in the Occupy movements camps? To whom do you file a complaint? Who gets the irate phone call?

h/t Sammy

Navigation