Great Moments In Socialism

Fox News;

Rationing began in September when consumers were forced to register their fingerprints at PDVAL stores in order to limit the consumption of 23 basic goods ranging from milk to toilet paper–in order to prevent the resale and smuggling of goods, authorities said.
But since many public supermarkets didn’t get scanning machines, most shops registered identity card numbers instead.

Seems like a lot of trouble. Tattoos would be easier.
h/t Kevin B.

We Don’t Need No Stinking Giant Fans

A win for the good guys;

Cape Wind was supposed to be America’s first offshore wind project. Chief sponsor Jim Gordon labored since 2001 (14 years!) on his vision of 130 massive spinning fans sited in shallow federal waters off New England’s historic coastline (468 MW at maximum capacity). Mr. Gordon was the darling of environmental groups and green-minded politicos who pushed big wind at any price.
Last week, the project was dealt a fatal blow when utilities who contracted to buy the energy terminated their agreements. Cape Wind will never be built, and no amount of green-colored optimism will change that fact.

h/t Don B.

Wildrose Country

A dissection;

At that time there were a variety of fringe right-wing parties floating around and, under Hinman, they consolidated under the Wildrose Alliance. I loved it, because I was (am) fantastically right-wing. My assumption was that anyone drawn to the Wildrose Party would be people like me or, at the very least, people slightly more conservative than what the PC party offered in 2009.
During the 2012 campaign I realized I was wrong.
People in 2012 were supporting the Wildrose Party because they were a new, populist party that people associated with friendly, photogenic Danielle Smith. I found myself campaigning alongside wildly different types of supporters. Liberals informed me that they were voting Wildrose because they offered the best alternative to a PC government. This was before they seemed to realize what the other, original half of the people in the party were about.

Plenty of good observations in there, I suspect.

“Who speaks for Islam?”

Roger Kimball;

We were told that the 9/11 terrorists, though Muslim, did not speak for Islam. OK, maybe they didn’t. But how about the London subway bombers? They claimed to be murdering people in the name of Allah or Mohammed. But maybe they were wrong. Maybe they read the wrong parts of the Koran or Hadith, or interpreted those eyebrow-raising passages too literally or something. Maybe.
Yet here’s my puzzlement. Let’s agree, for the sake of the discussion, that the 9/11 bombers did not speak for Islam. Ditto the London murders. Indeed, let’s say that neither the Boston marathon bombers nor the people who murdered a total of 16 people in Paris last week (the 12 at Charlie Hebdo and four at the kosher market), let’s say that they did not speak for Islam either. Like Major Hasan, who murdered 13 people at Ft Hood in 2009 while shouting “Allahu Akbar,” they were just “lone extremists” who carry out murder and mayhem while shouting “Allahu Akbar.” But that has nothing to do with Islam. OK. Got it.
But here’s my question: Who does speak for Islam? We are assured that it’s not the group that now calls itself Islamic State, but which, following Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, I am considering calling Daesh, a name they apparently dislike. Anyway, we know that they don’t speak for Islam because our political leaders and our media have told us so. It’s the same with Boko Haram, the Nigerian Muslim group. This morning, quoting the Australian journalist Andrew Bolt, I noted that they had kidnapped and sold into sex slavery 300 Nigerian school girls. That was before I saw the story that Boko Haram had just invaded another town killing as many as 2000. Boko Haram appears to believe that they represent Islamic teaching, but no: our leaders have assured us that that is not the case. Ditto about Syria: this summer an adulteress or two were stoned to death, but that, of course, was the work not of Islam but of “extremists,” if not quite “lone extremists.”
So who, according to the establishment gospel, does speak for Islam? The Ayatollah Khomeni was the spiritual leader of Iran, a great Shia Muslim country. Did he speak for Islam? He didn’t like a novel by Salman Rushdie and told his followers to kill him for insulting Islam. Did the ayatollah speak for Islam?

Read it all. (h/t Ed Driscoll)

Navigation