The Great Feminization thesis: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.
In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.
The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.
The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.
Via Instapundit, grab a coffee.
It would seem that a plot of men’s vs. women’s IQ’s have the same mean of about 100. It is also known that the standard deviation for men’s IQ’s is greater than that of women’s. Hence the Larry Summers factual claim that “different availability of aptitude at the high end” partially explains the higher representation of men vs women in hard sciences and mathematics. The rage and vindictiveness from feminists was totally predictable and foreseeable. Let no microaggression go unanswered. The obvious question is why do these same feminists not take umbrage to the other fact demonstrated by the IQ distributions plot. The difference in IQ standard deviations also means that there are more profoundly stupid males than there are females! Should this fact not be a cause for feminist celebration.
The last two words sum up the eco-feminist left – ‘mob hysteria’. Anyone speaking truth to the official narratives of the fascist in-crowd is set upon by mad dogs masquerading as offended snowflakes. From the orange shirt (brown-shirt) crowd attacking Frances Widdowson on U W campus to the treatment of the free press cottage industry questioning looters and thugs lionizing the anti-Israeli Jihadists, a mob that apparently includes the Carney. The cowardly Marxist Professoriate, protected while sucking their soothers of tenure, self-actualize vicariously through their intellectually crippled produce.
This then, logically, is the next step.
https://sfstandard.com/2025/10/17/slutcon-flirt-girls-tech-bros/
We are already there. This article, if considered a response of sorts, reaches new lows with every paragraph.
And do notice that IQ is in the dustbin. This is gender and control at its basist level.
Amazingly the “Sneaky f–ker” roll is reversed in this bizzaro world, and played by a predatory alpha with a “body count.”
Philip Larkin would be so proud.
Scorned women are the reason there are now swinging dicks in the girl’s washroom.
But the destruction of western society is on mewling quims AND nutless men…who were probably birthed by a mewling quim who dumped her toxic masculine man.
Rational appeals have no place in the halls of academia.
So where are we now 20 years later? Plug in “famous Supreme Court Justices” and Grok will inform you that Ketanji Brown Jackson cannot be excluded – and that she is “known for her thorough legal reasoning and background as a public defender, she brings a unique perspective to the Court’s deliberations.”
Oh it’s unique alright.
Kind of reminds me how the Islamists operate, once they get to about 10-15% of the population they start making demands to change the culture. Women have done the same thing. The only question is, can the trends be reversed? If they can’t be reversed for the Great Feminization, then we won’t be able to reverse it for Islamization.
Ideology Island.
A reality TV death match between the Islamists and the Feminists would be eminently entertaining; and whoever won could face off against the alphabet people.
Yes, we know.
It turns out that the PUAs were right all along. Feminism is just one giant, decades-long shit test, and we’ve failed it badly.
Letting them vote was the beginning of the end, because it’s no longer possible to tell the hysterics to sit down and shut up. They’ve voted for politicians and laws that will destroy you if you do, regardless of the facts of the matter. It’s only by a stroke of luck Jian Ghomeshi wasn’t sent to jail for a very long time based on a conspiracy to fabricate multiple incidents of sexual assault, and the results of that trial have had no impact whatsoever on Canadian jurisprudence.
Get a passport and get out.