This Is Awkward

Langmann, C. “Canadian Firearms Legislation and Effects on Homicide 1974 to
2008.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence, In Press, Accepted Sept 30, 2011.

ABSTRACT
Canada has implemented legislation covering all firearms since 1977 and
presents a model to examine incremental firearms control. The effect of
legislation on homicide by firearm and the subcategory, spousal homicide is
controversial and has not been well studied to date. Legislative effects on
homicide and spousal homicide were analyzed using data obtained from
Statistics Canada from 1974 to 2008. Three statistical methods were applied
to search for any associated effects of firearms legislation. Interrupted
time series regression, ARIMA, and Joinpoint analysis were performed. No
significant beneficial associations between firearms legislation and
homicide or spousal homicide rates were found after the passage of three
Acts by the Canadian Parliament: Bill C-51 (1977), C-17 (1991), and C-68
(1995). Nor were effects found after the implementation of licensing in
2001, and the registration of rifles and shotguns in 2003. After the passage
of C-68, a decrease in the rate of the decline of homicide by firearm was
found by interrupted regression. Joinpoint analysis also found an increasing
trend in homicide by firearm rate post the enactment of the licensing
portion of C-68. Other factors found to be associated with homicide rates
were median age, unemployment, immigration rates, percent of population in
low income bracket, Gini index of income equality, population per police
officer, and incarceration rate. This study failed to demonstrate a
beneficial association between legislation and firearm homicide rates between 1974 and 2008.

Emphasis mine.

Welcome to Alberta’s New Progressive Conservative Party

In somewhat of a surprise victory, Alison Redford has won the leadership of the Alberta PC Party and will now be the Premier of the province.
Alberta voters now have a clear choice to make in the next provincial election:

  • Spendaholic, unaccountable same old, same old “progressive” policies under Redford
  • Responsible conservative policies under Danielle Smith

Let’s hope they make the right choice!

Enough with the Race Card!

I was explaining to a Mexican visitor the other day that the Left’s tried & true technique to shut down all debate on anything in Canada is to simply say, “We don’t want any American-style ________ {fill in the blank however you wish}.” This immediately stifles all real public discussion on the subject.
In America, a similar despicable technique has been deployed, in which you only need declare your opponent a “racist” and you’ve been able to destroy them and their arguments. This has worked very effectively for decades. Until now. Fair-minded Americans have grown absolutely fed up with the race card being played over & over & over again by Obama’s foot soldiers, simply because someone “dares” disagree with his policies, most of which have been very destructive to America.
The latest race baiter is actor Morgan Freeman. Rex Murphy isn’t having any of it. Neither are Dennis Miller or Herman Cain:

Let’s Just Get it Over With …

… and rename the IPCC the WWF:

The scientists whose names appear below have not only been examining one of the world’s most important questions for the IPCC. They have a documented, public relationship with professional lobbyists who have a strong interest in influencing this matter. (For readers who are just tuning in, the WWF believes it is “nearly impossible to overstate” the threat posed by climate change – see here, backup link here.)
The people on the list below either played some role in the 2007 Climate Bible or are helping to write the next IPCC report which is expected to be completed in 2013. In many cases, they’re doing dual duty.

Joseph Halpern, Freedom Fighter – R.I.P.

Joseph Halpern died in Ottawa this past summer. He was 88. He might have looked like every other old man each of us sees regularly but his history was certainly a whole lot different than most. This description of his life is well worth a read. Quite a contrast from the lives that we all lead today!
The old adage, “don’t judge a man unless you’ve walked a mile in his shoes”, certainly applies here.

The Last Refuge

Shortly after Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain suggested that African-Americans had been brainwashed into voting for Barack Obama (who received 95 to 96 percent of the black vote in the presidential election), Obama pollster and Democrat strategist Cornell Belcher, who was recently hired as one of CNN’s on-air political contributors, appeared on the network to denounce his fellow African-American as being the sort of racist and bigoted person who makes racist and bigoted statements:

“What Herman Cain said was a racist, bigoted statement and it should treated like a racist and bigoted person who makes those racist and bigoted statements.”

When fellow panelist Ari Fleischer took issue with the tenor and merit of the repeatedly reiterated accusation, and asked Belcher if he was “done” yet, Belcher replied:

“That’s a bigoted statement. That’s a bigoted statement, Ari.”

The sneer loses its glorious lustre

Say it ain’t so, Joe:

Climate alarmists always try to portray skeptics as ignorant, close-minded flat-earthers who lack sufficient education to understand even the basics of the science, and if it wasn’t for them, the world could start taking the necessary steps to rescue itself. Unfortunately for the warmists, the opposite is true. The warmists are the ones who are less educated scientifically. This is what a recent Yale University study shows. Professor Dan M. Kahan and his team surveyed 1540 US adults and determined that people with more education in natural sciences and mathematics tend to be more skeptical of AGW climate science.”

Pretty much consistent with my own personal experience.
h/t

Lack of Free Speech in Alberta

I often tell my American friends that they’re entitled to have 10 times the number of nitwits than Canada does because they have 10 times the population. But if you’d like positive proof that idiocracy is alive & well in Canuckistan, look no further than “Professor” Darren E. Lund of the University of Calgary. This fellow recently wrote a vindictive piece in the Calgary Herald, aimed squarely at anyone who supports free speech … and thus disagrees with him.
Throughout his screed, Lund goes on & on condemning others for hate speech while unable to fathom that he’s pumping out a whole lot of his own. And he has the audacity to utter this not so clever totalitarian paragraph:

What Carpay and other fear-mongers fail to notice is that most Albertans, and most Canadians for that matter, are deeply repulsed by hate speech. In this great land, we enjoy our freedoms with an understanding that there must be reasonable limits on those who seek to take away others’ humanity or safety.

To the casual reader this may sound just wonderful, like apple pie and butterflies, but to anyone who has followed the free speech debate in Canada it is downright scary. Who is it that decides what is “hate speech” and what are “reasonable limits”? But of course, the Far Left zealots at the disgraced “human rights” commissions – folks who don’t believe that facts matter and are instead just driven by their unalterable ideology, namely: Anyone who disagrees with us must be uttering hate speech and thus must be silenced.
Ezra Levant is not unfamiliar with Lund, having talked at length about him in his book, Shakedown. Others have exposed Lund for being an anti-Christian bigot.
One particular line of Lund’s had me gobsmacked because of the deep irony:

Building a strong democracy must not include the freedom to poison the public discourse and actually threaten the safety of vulnerable people.

Emphasis mine. This makes one wonder if Darren Lund has covered up all of the mirrors in his home? He clearly hasn’t been observing his own words or actions in a very long time.
Earlier this year, Lund’s crusade against free speech was discussed on Michael Coren’s show:

We Don’t Need No Stinking Giant Mirrors

Via Walter Russell Mead;


Solar-power equipment manufacturer Stirling Energy Systems Inc. has filed for bankruptcy, adding to a wave of troubles in the solar industry amid soft demand, falling prices and difficulty raising money. [… ] Both [of the company’s plants] were sited on public land in California and obtained fast-track construction pemits from the Obama administration.

Mead notes …

But there’s another factor behind the failure of so many Obama administration initiatives in this field. Because alternative energy generation is expensive and inefficient, it requires some combination of subsidies, high energy prices and forced purchases to make these investments pay off.

I remember the days when SDA was a lonely incandescent bulb of green energy truth, lighting a path through the blogosphere wilderness. Nowadays, it seems everyone’s jumping on the bandwagon. Still, when you read the word “investments” in a sentence like that above, one realizes there’s still work to be done. (h/t Instapundit)

The True Face of the Modern NDP is Exposed

This past Thursday, an interesting fact was revealed in Ottawa: The NDP doesn’t care about the welfare and prosperity of private sector union members.
A forum was held, run jointly by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers and Canada’s building trades unions. It focused on the almost certain lack of skilled workers in the oil industry in the near future. The goal of the forum was to urge politicians to increase apprenticeships for skilled trades as well as increase immigration of accredited skilled workers.
“Conservative MPs showed up, Liberal MPs were there, but not even one NDP MP showed up,” said Christopher Smillie, a senior adviser for the Building and Construction Trades Department of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), Canadian Office. He represents 450,000 construction union members across Canada.
The Calgary Herald’s Licia Corbella has the full story.
So why didn’t any NDP MPs show up? Because their political masters these days are extreme left-wing zealots, all of whom subscribe to environmental extremism and the destruction of Canada’s oil industry. If I were a private sector union member I’d have a difficult time convincing myself why I would want to vote for the federal NDP, a party that has shown nothing but disdain for me and my family.

Where It Started Going Wrong

Not what one might think:

William Watson: U.S. created Trudeau
emigration.jpg
…the option of picking up and moving to the United States no longer really exists for most Canadians. The first legal limits on entry to the United States came in the mid-1920s, though we were essentially exempted from them. But in 1965, the United States changed its immigration laws and did make Canadians part of a small annual quota for migrants from the western hemisphere. Turnabout was fair play: we had increased our restrictions on American immigration in 1962.
In Closing the 49th Parallel, a fascinating new paper in the academic journal Canadian Public Policy, the Canadian economists Stanley Winer of Carleton University and James Davies of the University of Western Ontario argue that the Americans’ decision to foreclose the possibility of an easy escape to the United States created a captive tax base for the Canadian politicians of the 1960s and 1970s and lowered the political cost to them from raising taxes and building up the Canadian welfare state…

Age of minority

Aw, just look at him, he’s the spitting image of his mother and mother:

The lesbian parents of an 11-year-old boy who is undergoing the process of becoming a girl last night defended the decision, claiming it was better for a child to have a sex change when young.

Thomas Lobel, who now calls himself Tammy, is undergoing controversial hormone blocking treatment in Berkeley, California to stop him going through puberty as a boy.

Infants be warned: you’d better choose your first words very, very carefully:

The mothers say that one of the first things Thomas told them when he learned sign language aged three – because of a speech impediment – was, ‘I am a girl’.

(Addendum: Read Richard Fernandez’s September 29 post at PJM and, especially, his comments (as “Wretchard”) below the article.)

Run for your rights

An enraged mob in the northern Dene community of La Loche, Sasktatchewan threw bottles at RCMP officers and stormed a local hospital after officers violated the constitutional right to flee on one’s ATV when approached by police.
As this video of a separate incident in 2009 graphically illustrates, it’s not the first time that La Loche RCMP have violated this fundamental right.
h/t Black Mamba

Navigation