Category: Onta-i-owe

Featured Comment

Steve from Rockwood

In Northern Ontario is located the Ring of Fire, a geological feature in the James Bay Lowlands that holds a massive chromite deposit and a nickel-copper deposit known as the Eagle’s Nest. Exploration in 2007 led to the discovery of these ore deposits and they have yet to be mined. The area is remote from existing infrastructure with the nearest “town” of Nakina more than 300 km to the south.

Local indigenous communities such as Webequie have very small populations. Webequie, for example, is home to less than 1,500 Ojibway.

To mine the ore from the Ring of Fire will require a railway, a roadway and electrification. Early estimates of the cost for such infrastructure were $2-$4 billion and were scoffed at as being too high. Now the cost estimates are starting to trickle in.

To build a hydro line into the Ring of Fire is estimated to cost about $1.7 billion.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ring-fire-electrical-infrastructure-capex-study-finds-kevin-thomsen

The so-called “massive nickel deposit” that is the Eagle’s Nest is estimated at 20 Mt. This compares to Voiseys Bay at over 100 Mt, Thompson Manitoba at over 200 Mt and the mighty (now mostly mined-out) Sudbury Basin at over 1 Bt (B=billion).

The total cost to provide infrastructure to the Ring of Fire will exceed $4 billion – easily. The total value of the Eagle’s Nest has been estimated at $5-$7 billion in-situ (as if the ore was sitting on the ground processed and ready to ship to eager markets). The cost of mining is typically 50% of the value of the ore. This means the nickel deposit will be mined by an Australian company at a gross profit of $3.5 billion for infrastructure costs of $4 billion (and more).

It is very likely the project will go ahead. I just thought the fine taxpayers of Ontario would want to know that $4 billion of their tax revenue is being spent on a few thousand people in Northern Ontario and an Australian mining company without any discussion of who will pay to maintain the infrastructure after the mines have closed.

They Don’t Need No Stinking Giant Mirrors

SDA gets RESULTS!

Ontario’s new Progressive Conservative government is cancelling 758 renewable energy contracts, in what it says is an effort to reduce electricity bills in the province. […]

 

“For 15 years, Ontario families and businesses have been forced to pay inflated hydro prices so the government could spend on unnecessary and expensive energy schemes,” Rickford said. “Those days are over.”

They don’t need no flaming sparky cars, either.

(h/t raid)

Ford Country

What the Doug Ford Government means for the Energy Sector – the great unwynnding;

“Premier Doug Ford ran and won on a platform labeled For the People: A Plan for Ontario. The platform set out Ford’s energy plan, in its entirety, as follows:

 

• Clean up the Hydro Mess and fire the board of Hydro One and its $6-million-dollar CEO.

 

• Our first act will be to end the Liberal practice of making millionaires from your hydro bills!

 

• Stop sweetheart deals by scrapping the Green Energy Act.

 

• Cut hydro rates by 12% for families, farmers, and small businesses by:

 

• Returning Hydro One dividend payments to families.

 

• Stopping the Liberal practice of burying the price tag for conservation programs in your hydro bills and instead pay for these programs out of general government revenue.

 

• Cancel energy contracts that are in the pre-construction phase and re-negotiate other energy contracts.

 

• Declare a moratorium on new energy contracts.

 

• Eliminate enormous salaries at Ontario Power Generation and Hydro One.

h/t raid

Fewer Pavilions At Fordfest

Hitting the ground  running;

Blaming Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government for creating “a mess,” Premier Doug Ford’s new Progressive Conservative administration is withdrawing Ontario’s co-operation with Ottawa on resettling asylum seekers, the Star has learned.

 

Ontario Children, Community and Social Services Minister Lisa MacLeod told federal Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen that Queen’s Park is stepping back from the migration crisis. […]

 

That could sound the death knell for the Canada-Ontario Immigration Agreement signed by former premier Kathleen Wynne last November.

You don’t say.

Wynneing!

WUT?

Kathleen Wynne on Saturday acknowledged that she will no longer be premier after the June 7 election and encouraged voters to elect Liberal candidates to prevent the NDP or PCs from securing a majority.

 

“Even though I won’t be leading this province as premier, I care deeply about how it will be led,” the Liberal leader said during a campaign stop in Toronto.

 

“People want change, but by and large they’re confident about where Ontario stands and where Ontario is headed. For this reason, many voters are worried about handing a blank cheque to either Doug Ford or the NDP,” she continued.

Oh.

What Would We Do Without Pollsters?

From the comments;

The latest Ontario polls show … confusion?
EKOS reports a dead heat.
Innovative Research shows a 5 point PC lead.
Forum alleges a 14 point NDP lead, with the Liberals half of what’s reported in the other two polls.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_general_election,_2018

We need to ask at this point — do these pollsters do their surveys on the same planet? Or do they make them up as they go along?

Wynneing!

Wynneing!

http://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-auditor-general-shatters-the-fiscal-fantasy

Lysyk said Wynne’s budget underestimates government deficits for the next three years by $16.6 billion, or 84 per cent, for two reasons.

 

First, it fails to reflect the true cost of its scheme to temporarily reduce electricity rates, known as the Fair Hydro Plan.

 

Second, the government improperly treated surpluses in the Ontario teacher and civil service pension plans as assets, since it can’t access that money without union permission.

 

“When expenses are understated, the perception is created that government has more money available than it actually does,” Lysyk wrote.

 

“Therefore, more money will need to be borrowed to pay for the unrecorded expenses, even when government reports an annual surplus or a balanced budget.

 

“A perception is also created of an improving trend in the relationship between the government’s financial obligations and its capacity to raise funds to meet them when the burden of net debt is actually increasing.”

h/t David Southam    who adds a few comments of his own.

 

Navigation