Long time SDA readers may have noticed that I seldom mention Jack “Cindy” Layton. There’s a reason for that (beyond the NDP’s fourth party status). I’ve concluded that there are only a few explanations for why Layton says the things he does, and none of them are curable. He’s not worth the time and effort. For example:
Layton urged the Conservative government to grant sanctuary to young soldiers, noting Canada became a safe haven for Americans seeking to avoid the Vietnam draft more than 30 years ago.
“We should be looking at it,” he said. “These young people are courageous individuals. They’ve made a decision of conscience.”
However, there are others willing to waste electrons on him – including Damian Brooks;
What did you say? “Conscience?” You’re a little late to the party there, aren’t you?
I mean, ask Bev Desjarlais what following your conscience gets you in the Jack Layton NDP.
Indeed.
And sticking with that theme: the Globe and Mail’s latest “news story created by a poll commissioned to create a news story” provides the pretext for pollster Allan Gregg to openly long for the day when Canadian Forces leave Afghanistan and return to helping little old ladies cross streets. No, really!
Mark Collins, guest blogging at Daimnation is onto them. Check it out.
Monday morning update – As if on cue, more Laytonesque Logic on display. He wants Canadian troops pulled from the battle against a fundamentalist Islamic government in exile and redeployed to battle a fundamentalist Islamic government in power. His military strategy is impeccable – because the polls tell him so!
Flashback – Back in 2004, the National Post’s Robert Fulford fixed on one of those incurable traits I alluded to.
He’s not quite up to the job. Layton in print differs from Layton on TV. The guy with the moustache, impressively confident if too glib to be quite plausible, can’t be found in this book. In his place we meet a good-hearted, simple-minded chap, a writer without skill and a man without humour.
Emphasis mine.




