Post Debate Analysis


NRO’s Yural Levin had a comprehensive take on the debate. Here’s a key snippet:

Even more astonishing, to me, was Obama’s ignorant and gratuitous insult to the U.S. Navy, describing Navy ships as the equivalent of horses and bayonets. It seemed like a prepared line, and it was appalling. Are the hundreds of thousands of sailors bearing arms under our flag (on the president’s orders) defending America’s security around the world tonight merely riders in some quixotic cavalry brigade chasing make-believe Indian chiefs? How exactly does a “pivot to Asia” work without those old fashioned ships? How does a global superpower project force abroad with fewer ships than it had when it wasn’t a global superpower? How does the advent of aircraft carriers make the Navy less rather than more significant? Is the sitting president really this confused about defense strategy? That line seems like a Romney ad in Virginia just waiting to happen.

Commander-In-Chief

Now is the time at SDA when we juxtapose!
Barack Obama;

Marine Corps Boot Camp;

Update;

Contrary to the president’s assertion, the creation of aircraft carriers and submarines did not mean that we needed fewer ships. Quite the contrary. Aircraft carriers need just as many if not more supporting vessels than the obsolete battleships that no are no longer under commission. So do subs. The decline in naval strength compromises America’s ability to project power abroad. That is particularly true in places like the Persian Gulf, where President Obama is trying to sound as tough with Iran as Romney.
Even more foolish is the president’s attempt to portray contemporary naval vessels with cavalry horses. That says more about his own lack of understanding of the military than Romney’s. It also may cost him some votes in a state that he still hopes to win: Virginia, home of the largest U.S. Naval base in the country and hotbed of support for a stronger military.

Tommy Douglas: Not Dead Enough

Welcome to the compassionate world of government health care.

During the first presidential debate, President Barack Obama made a claim against Mitt Romney that has been ringing in my ears ever since. Speaking on the topic of health care, Obama said that Romney would leave people “At the mercy of private insurance.”
The implication of course is that Obama will protect people from the big, mean insurance companies, and his own plan, Obamacare, is the more compassionate way. Supporters of government health care, and that is what Obamacare will morph into, love to make the insurance industry out to be the boogeyman.
Let me set you straight.

Barack Obama is a Better Human Being than You

Whether or not you’re a psychologist, you will find beyond fascinating this insight into the mind of a Boston area Obama supporter. “Meredith” called into Michael Graham’s show this afternoon. Obama For America propaganda clearly must be having an effect on the likes of her. After listening to Meredith, aren’t you just ready to march out on the streets and help Obama retain power for the next 20 years?!
Bonus audio: Mark Steyn on Graham’s show today.

Betting Up The Weak Horse

What’s in it for Iran?

The New York Times broke a story on Saturday, saying that the White House may be engaging in US-Iran bilateral talks with Iran, discussing Iran’s developing nuclear program. Interestingly enough, it seems the Obama administration has outright denied that any talks will be taking place. Nevertheless, this is supposedly going to be the ‘October surprise’ we’ve all been waiting for, as several analysts still believe that the announcement for bilateral talks will be made before the election. The New York Times reports:

The United States and Iran have agreed in principle for the first time to one-on-one negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program, according to Obama administration officials, setting the stage for what could be a last-ditch diplomatic effort to avert a military strike on Iran.

Now, if the talks aren’t going to take place, then the Obama administration maintains the status quo, concerning its foreign policy that seems to be unravelling. If the talks do take place, then this opens up a whole new can of worms for both candidates.

Four more years of Obama, that’s what.

Latvia’s Success Highlights Krugman’s Failure

If someone keeps on giving you advice that turns out to be wrong, would you continue to listen to them? In this fascinating interview, John Batchelor talks with Ireland’s Marc Coleman about his home country, about Latvia, and the many similarities between the two. At one point Coleman says, paraphrasing: “Latvia ignored Paul Krugman’s stupid advice about devaluating their currency. As a result, their economy grew by 5.5% last year.”
More about Latvia’s Common Sense vs. Krugman’s Failed Leftist Ideology can be read here.

The Birds Always Sing After The Storm

The curious case of Golden, an incurious tale of the fall of Rod Blagojevich;

But at the press conference announcing Blagojevich’s “political corruption crime spree,” Fitzgerald expressed no desire to track down the source of the leak that had just compromised the biggest case of his career. This was a curious reaction by the prosecutor who had previously become a household name by jailing New York Times reporter Judith Miller for 85 days when she refused to reveal sources Fitzgerald already knew about in the Valerie Plame affair.

h/t Marina

Navigation