Honey, I Finished The Internet
David Letterman’s Suit of Velcro (February 28, 1984)
The Hill They Chose to Die On
Going to the State of the Union was one of the most radicalizing moments of my life.
I watched in horror from the balcony as Democrats refused to stand for BASIC AMERICAN PRINCIPLES.
They refused to stand for Americans… for me and for you.
Ok Democrats… message recieved. pic.twitter.com/p55OsUNFs6
— Matt Van Swol (@mattvanswol) February 25, 2026
An Absolutely Beautiful Moment
There are people in this country who rooted against their own country and own team in this game.
The team who wanted to share their victory with the children of their teammate who was killed by a drunk driver.
Perspective. pic.twitter.com/jxSIu53m9q
— Penguins Jesus (@PenguinsJesus) February 22, 2026
Might Be a Good Idea to Shut Down MAID For a Few Weeks
Anybody who has videos of Canada’s hopes and dreams being shattered feel free to send along pic.twitter.com/ZzYmGYBFF8
— Dave Portnoy (@stoolpresidente) February 22, 2026
I have never seen anything like this. I’m in Canada as most know. I live in a very Liberal hot bed of morons. …
Two Possible Paths Forward for the World
Britain’s Long Decline
Grab a hot beverage and enjoy this very interesting video.
Richard Nixon Got A Raw Deal
Someone broke into the New York Times over the weekend and got this published: Seven Pages of a Sealed Watergate File Sat Undiscovered. Until Now.
On July 1, 1975, under gray skies, two Watergate prosecutors arrived in the office of the White House counsel. Also present was the deputy national security adviser, U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft. They were gathered for a burial.
The intended object was a 297-page transcript created the previous week, when eight members of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, joined by a stenographer and two members of a federal grand jury, among others, had interrogated Richard Nixon under oath near his home in San Clemente, Calif. Over two days, the ex-president’s grand jury testimony consumed 11 hours. Then came an interview by the prosecutors, undisclosed until now, that lasted another two.
President Gerald Ford had pardoned Nixon for all crimes he committed or may have committed in office, but the threat of perjury still hung over him. It was, by all accounts, the first time that any president had appeared before a grand jury and the only time that Nixon testified in depth about Watergate.
Since early 1973, when the scandal morphed from a caper covered chiefly by newspapers into a televised national obsession — the dawn of saturation coverage — the nation had endured a cascade of headlines, resignations, hearings, trials, reports, memoirs and archival releases. In the eyes of prosecutors, the former president figured centrally in what one termed the “organized criminal activity” of the Nixon administration: the Ellsberg break-in, the Kissinger wiretaps, Jimmy Hoffa and the Teamsters cash, Howard Hughes and the casinos, the sale of ambassadorships, I.R.S. abuses, C.I.A. assassination plots.
Near the end of Nixon’s second and final day on the stand, the examination strayed into a subject that wasn’t listed on the agenda. This prompted Nixon to admonish his interrogator, “I would strongly urge the special prosecutor: Don’t open that can of worms.” More extraordinary still, the prosecutors agreed.
The four men gathered in the White House that July recognized that the document they held was a road map to the darkest precincts of the Cold War. In a sworn setting, the nation’s only ex-president had explored, from his lonely perspective, the entwined subjects of war and peace, power and money, scandals and secrets. Proper procedure required secrecy; the officials went beyond that.
The transcript was placed under the protective seal of the grand jury and ordered withheld even from top officials at the Justice Department. In the White House counsel’s office, General Scowcroft determined that one seven-page segment, focused on the very subject that Nixon had warned about, was so incendiary that it needed to be withheld even from the rest of the grand jury.
The Layoffs Will Continue Until Journalism Improves
Asmongold reviews the recent Wapo layoffs.
#LearToCode
Why is Alberta Being Handled Very Differently than Québec?
A Message for All Albertans
Ask yourself why, in 1995, Canadians reached out to everyone in Québec with great affection & love. Now, in 2026, the usual suspects are calling Albertans treasonous and soon … Far Right, traitors, white supremacists, Nazis, etc.
They view you as “less than”. They view you as serfs who must continue to work hard forever to pay tributes to them out east and in B.C. It’s despicable.
They will use hateful rhetoric to try to coerce you. Then there will be phoney criminal charges against some of you. Then there will be false flag operations, where they pretend that some independence supporters have committed crimes. Then they will use violence against you.
If independence is what you want, you must stay strong, because there are great forces working against you all. Your opponents do not believe in democracy. They do not believe in being honest brokers. All they believe in is power and will refuse to give it up at almost any cost.
Update: It’s early on in the Alberta Independence campaign and already a “journalist” is calling Tamara Lich a “terrorist”.
Compromised Anti-Alberta Independence Voices?
First Nations chiefs are demanding that Danielle Smith resign. Ezra Levant pointed out an uncomfortable fact from a dozen years ago.
A Brave New Possible Future for Alberta
This is one of the best yet!
— Albertan AF (@AlbertanAFk) January 29, 2026
Alberta Independence Rally in Calgary
SDA regular, Marc in Calgary, has shared with us information about an important event in Calgary tomorrow evening.
For folks in the Calgary area, we’re having a friendly get-together about Alberta Independence. If you’re interested in hearing more about the destiny of Alberta, please do attend if you can. If you’re from out of town and think parking will be a problem, there is a C-train stop within a block of the entrance to the BMO / Bank of Montreal Centre. Attendance at these events in the small towns has been outstanding.
Date: Monday, January 26, 2026
Time: 11am – Signing begins 7pm – Speakers
Location: The Big Four Building
Address: 1801 Big Four Trail SE, Calgary, AB
Event link
Update: More Info from Marc.
If America & Europe Lived in the Same Town
I’ve been carefully watching a lot of British & European reaction to what happened at Davos this past week. The arrogance of most of it is very instructional.
If Europe and America were neighbors in the same town, here’s a good metaphor:
The Americans would be the average blue collar townsfolk, toiling away at their jobs, paying their taxes, and not expecting a whole lot in return from their government, other than to be left alone to live their lives.
The Europeans would be an old aristocratic family living in a posh, but not well kept up mansion on the edge of town. Over the years, these folks had stopped paying their fair share of taxes, stopped volunteering, stopped helping in any meaningful way, yet fully expecting their “lesser” neighbors to do everything for them.
When the American neighbors finally said enough is enough, the Europeans would be outraged, cry victim, and do everything they could to coerce the Americans to return back to paying for their lifestyle.
P.S. I’m not sure how Canada fits into this metaphor, but am open to suggestions.
Left Finds A Racial Slur for Whites They Don’t Like
New York Times- After Renee Good Killing, Derisive Term for White Women Spreads on the Far Right
…some even using an acronym: AWFUL, or Affluent White Female Urban Liberal.
Dispatches from the Maple Gulag Truck Stop
To celebrate today’s supreme court decision.
The Truckers were right. pic.twitter.com/2ZbViyYzob
— Martyupnorth®- Unacceptable Fact Checker (@Martyupnorth) January 16, 2026
Shameless Plug for Gord Magill’s new book ‘End of the Road’. Buy a copy and upset Mark Carney’s New World Order.
And of course the we need to hear from Tamara and Big Red on the only Canadian news source with any integrity.
First Person Take on the Arrest of Maduro?
I can’t verify this post, but found it very compelling:
This account from a Venezuelan security guard loyal to Nicolás Maduro is absolutely chilling—and it explains a lot about why the tone across Latin America suddenly changed.
Security Guard: On the day of the operation, we didn’t hear anything coming. We were on guard, but suddenly all our radar systems shut down without any explanation. The next thing we saw were drones, a lot of drones, flying over our positions. We didn’t know how to react.
Interviewer: So what happened next? How was the main attack?
Security Guard: After those drones appeared, some helicopters arrived, but there were very few. I think barely eight helicopters. From those helicopters, soldiers came down, but a very small number. Maybe twenty men. But those men were technologically very advanced. They didn’t look like anything we’ve fought against before.
Interesting Insight from a Venezuelan
I saw the following text across different parts of the Internet, apparently accredited to a displaced Venezuelan in America named Juan Pablo Sans.
Unless you are Venezuelan, you are missing almost everything that matters. I am Venezuelan. I left my country in 2013, when Hugo Chávez died and Nicolás Maduro took power. I didn’t leave because I wanted to “try life abroad.” I left because I could see what was coming, and staying meant watching my future shrink year after year. So when Americans ask, “What do Venezuelans think about Trump forcing Maduro out of the presidency?” Let me answer that question honestly, without slogans, without moral theater, and without pretending this is simple. Most Venezuelans feel relief. Not because we love Trump or because we believe the U.S. does things out of pure love for freedom. And not because we are naïve about geopolitics, oil, or power. We feel relief because we have lived through something Americans have never experienced: a country where nothing works, where elections don’t matter, where money stops being money, and where time itself feels broken.
Now, before someone jumps in to say “but not all Venezuelans agree,” let’s be precise. Yes, there is a minority that doesn’t agree. And that minority usually falls into one of three groups.
- Some were doing business with the regime.
- Some were personally comfortable inside the system and insulated from its worst consequences.
- And some were pushed into such extreme poverty that survival depended on obedience.
Interesting Take on the Maduro Capture
I can’t speak to the veracity of this video, but found it very compelling.
Honey, I Finished The Internet
In 1928, cyclists raced on penny farthings with giant front wheels and tiny back wheels.

