10 Replies to “The System That Cages The People-Iran”

  2. There are two cages. Both, here, are under pressure.
    The British just blinked. Starmer’s feeling it, and allows US to use British air space.
    The Chagos decision may have neutered the British empire.
    Why is Canada buying LNG from Australia?
    Interesting times indeed.

    1. The East doesn’t want to buy our gas and doesn’t want to develop their own gas. I knew someone who 15 or 20 years ago went to test gas wells in New Brunswick and Quebec before they decided they preferred Alberta’s transfer payments to getting rich themselves.

      1. I JUST CAN’T WAIT UNTIL ALBERTA QUITS GIVING THOSE PEOPLE OUR TRANSFER PAYMENTS………ENOUGH ALREADY. ALBERTA INDEPENDENCE ALL THE WAY

    2. Because there is no business case to buy Canadian gas… But you knew that.

  3. So then … he just described what the LGBTQueer-mutant mafia are doing to Western nations. Nothing will SILENCE you and get you CANCELED faster and harder … than going against the Gay Pride, Gay indoctrination narrative. Disparage a Gay or Trans in England? You’ll surely be jailed. Think about that. We have allowed a fringe group of hysteric activists to take total control of Western nations. Any such wrongthink will get you destroyed. It’s time to wake up before we are FORCED to worship The Supreme LGBTQueer mutant.

    And it all started with … tolerance. A word that has become to mean – forced fealty.

    1. Gee, I didn’t realize that a “fringe group of hysteric activists” has taken total control of the US, not to mention the Western nation I live in and others I’ve had the pleasure to visit.

      1. Yes, I often see people dressed like Roger Daltrey, but they don’t strike me as all that hysteric, or even activist, and certainly not in control. I suppose there may be other fringe groups out there.

    2. “But we should claim the right to suppress them [intolerant ideologies] if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.” Karl Popper, “The Open Society and its Enemies”

  4. He tries to describe events in Iran without bringing Islam into it, and therefore misses the point entirely. This revolution .. if it is one .. is a people fighting to rid themselves of an ancient movement with global ambitions. Islam doesn’t allow for secession; any peoples trying to leave the Ummah infuriates true believers. We are fortunate that many Muslims today are living their lives without strict adherence to what is laid down in the Koran, supposedly the incontestable words of Mo (PBUH Pigs Be Upon Him) and will see the downfall of the Islamic order in Iran as encouragement to quietly slip away themselves. Islam, everywhere under rule by Imams, is a coercive tyranny, well described in principle by the above speaker but far beyond the power of any tin-pot dictator. Any number of Muslim leaders can be exterminated with more joining the cause as a result .. the “faith” doesn’t rest on any one individual or even a cadre; it is an organism that would have to be weeded out all the way down to its tap root. If we are seeing a demonstration that a people will no longer tolerate the coercion, then Islam, not just an Ayatollah or Mullah, is in trouble.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation