12 Replies to “Safe And Effective ®”

  1. The usual “I’m only following orders” absolves one of all sins, right?

    1. I wanted to keep my job and not lose my house. My questions to “the company doctor” were not answered, but were forwarded to the HR department.

      And a copy of all such correspondence was saved, in the expectation that my wife would use it in a lawsuit in the event of my death. Fortunately for me, that is not yet needed.

        1. General items like:
          Has full stage 3 testing been completed on this vaccine anywhere in the world?
          Have the vaccines completed testing, or are they still approved for use only as an emergency measure and in the abence of other treatment options?
          Will an adverse reaction resulting in hospitalization result in a loss time incident for the company and be reflected in our safety statistics?
          Theraputics are available around the world that have shown strong efficacy at treating the virus and the disease(s) that it causes. Why does the company’s statement about informed consent not mention any of these theraputics nor offer them as an option to those of us who don’t want our cells programmed to induce production of possible pathogens?
          The Pfitzer vaccine was developed using embrionic kidney cells. These cells can only be harvested by the vivisection of a live infant and without anesthetic. I am a Christian and do not want to have any products of abortion imposed on my body. Is this complaint and question enough to obtain a religious exemption, or does the company insist that I must be damned for eternity (my understanding of the results of this horrid “collection”)?
          mRNA is part of the body’s genetic system. The Nuremburg code holds that the application of genetic testing or change without informed consent and agreement is not to be done. Who within the company has made the decision that this change to my genetic system must be done as a condition of employment, so that that/those individuals can be held legally responsible in the future trials which will follow these actions?

          None of these questions were answered. A 2 page “here’s what you need to know about the vaccines” was passed around that answered none of these questions, but instead tried to claim that because DNA is not directly altered it’s not a genetic modification.

  4. I assume that it is still very rare that doctors or pharmacists in the West know about the relative uselessness and danger of these prophylactic gene therapies and are still „following orders“ and thereby willingly harm their customers and patients. They may not make a good figure as medical practioners but I would refrain from suspecting most of them of anything more than the usual ignorance, group think and indifference which is not at all a rarety in other well paid professions as well. I would leave it at gross negligence and not accuse them of criminal behavior. Maybe we should first win this war for our liberty and then think about tribunals. I lack the fantasy to see the main culprits in China and elsewhere be punished by us and would be happy about an armistice with my fellow victims who have been so successfully brainwashed.

    1. because a nice, thick, insert shows that they’ve thought about it a lot. That it’s blank shows that they didn’t come up with much, but want most to think “wow, they must have thought about this a lot!”.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation