This is a fascinating video that gets to the heart of many failed relationships in our modern age.
In general terms, I’ve long observed that men are more pragmatic and logical and women are more emotional and empathetic. I will never be able to understand how any sincere man can ever be Far Left or Woke. So, when it comes to dating, if a man meets a woman, how will he ever be able to agree with her political views on … anything? Yet, such women fully demand that men agree with their suicidal empathetic views on: Lindsay Clancy, the Cornell 7, Renee Good, illegal immigration, social justice, slavery reparations, releasing repeat criminals to commit more crimes, etc.
A based man may succumb to the sexual wiles of an attractive woman, but there is no way he will get involved in a longterm relationship with her. Then these same women complain that “men only want one thing”. Yet they refuse to acknowledge that their insane views might be the root cause of their unhappiness in relationships.
Asmongold: “Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Men are the gatekeepers of relationships.”
“…such women fully demand that men agree with their suicidal empathetic views on: [insert outrage du jour here]”
Yes indeed they do. The hotter they are, the more deranged their demands. And men who want to sleep with them will lie and lie and lie all day long, string them along for weeks, and then *poof!* Vanish like a morning dew. Because no matter how hot she is, eventually the crazy gets to be a deal breaker.
I figure the women will either come to their senses after the twentieth time they get ghosted, or they’ll waste their fertile years and become childless old harpies.
This isn’t a new thing, they did the same to me in the 1980s. I didn’t marry a white Canadian woman because they were all raging lunatics and not one of them could be trusted as far as I could throw her by the ear. I know many old harpies that used to be hot, let’s just say. It’s a pretty common outcome.
It’s the old adage: No matter how attractie a woman is, somewhere there’s a man that’s tired of her shit.
BINGO !!! after getting the brush off by some 99% of females (not an exaggeration l got a face like a mule), came the time l opted to focus on the foreign students in the university l had my 1st full time job.
well, well, well, 2 years later lm hooked up with a plain looking 20something from Hong Kong.
the drought was over, my 8 1/2″ dick (took me until internet days to find out that was markedly bigger than avg.
l started to quip ‘my face aint the only thing like a mule’ lol) suitably thrilled and impressed her.
we had a kid, nice house, then l got tired of the nagging so we split up.
also along the way someone *else* quipped ‘beautiful women are a dime a dozen’. also true.
Be sure to send GYM a dick pic, he’d be thrilled.
“men only want one thing”
Not really, but often it’s the only thing interesting about some women and the only thing they can contribute. Can’t cook, won’t clean, student debt, no car, no house, third wave feminist attitudes. But I want non-negotiable 6 ft 3 in tall 35 year old millionnaire CEO underwear model. Wanna see what stimulates the mind of the modern woman? Look at the supermarket check out magazines. The educated one? The “recommended by staff” section of Indigo bookstore.
“I want non-negotiable 6 ft 3 in tall 35 year old millionnaire CEO underwear model.”
heh. -I want a pony-
My one objection to this is the use of the term ‘suicidal empathy’.
I have a lot of compassion for the idiot woman that has bad things happen during her bikini backpacking trip across the middle east or Indian subcontinent, for their folly only affects themselves. What they preach and vote for has a great impact on the rest of civilization and should be termed ‘genocidal empathy’.
Apparently not a new phenomenon, during the Victorian era, Dickens called it telescopic philanthropy, focus on some far away problem you can’t possibly have an impact on while ignoring what is right here. It gives the dopamine rush of thinking you are a good person at no cost to yourself. The difference is during Dickens time, it really wasn’t practical to bring in 50,000 problems at a time, and the rest of society (and leadership) would ignore the demands to do so.
“…focus on some far away problem you can’t possibly have an impact on…”
Which brings us those helpful, compassionate souls giving naxolone to the crows while the humans die in ever-increasing numbers. The poor crows, won’t someone think of them?
That’s got to be the most “White Woman” charity ever. Can you imagine living in the same household as that? You’d go mad in a week.
True.
My late 20s son is based. He’s checked out of the “dating scene”, the women are lunatics, especially in Victoria. He’s got no time for their woke nuttiness.
Still, I sympathize with his situation, he wants a good woman, but this town is full of entitled princesses and woketard nuts
I’m gonna guess the woman in that ‘fascinating video’ is under 24yo … and she’s caked make-up onto her face like a Japanese Geisha whore. So … 1) she’s hideous without it … or plain Jane at best and 2) she’s made herself essentially … untouchable.
What are you gonna do? Kiss her? I don’t think so. That might mess up her ‘face’ … and leave a nasty taste in your mouth. I admit it … I’m a kisser. A highly romantic, erotic (if you will) kisser. My type of kissing can ONLY be performed with a NATURAL woman. Sorry. If you aren’t cute enough without all that gooo on your face … you’ll never make my cut. And you will only look fake.
I have bemoaned the shocking loss of human contact for poor high school boys during COVID … when their natural hormonal urges got CANCELED by our government. But honestly … if THIS woman is the best (or most typical) of what’s out there? Perhaps it was a blessing that the high school boys got intimately acquainted with … ‘Rose Darling’ (Steely Dan reference).
Sometimes you just need to fck her brains out.
“Sometimes you just need to fck her brains out.”
Bold of you to assume there are any brains left. It seems they don’t grow back.
Someone beat you to it.
Politics was primarily the domain of men, and its purpose was to create a safer, more orderly environment in which civilization could thrive. A civilzation’s governance is built upon political discourse, principles, and laws. Law is backed by logic and by coercion – the threat of force – because failure to enforce the law could damage everything.
Society was primarily the domain of women, and it determined how men, women, and families would interact with each other to strengthen civilization. A civilization’s culture is built on social conventions, traditions, and protocols. Breaking social convention could severely impact a person’s or family’s opportunities to operate in society.
Men are political animals, while women are social animals. Men enforce politics with the stick. Women enforce social conventions with the carrot.
Women have rapidly entered the political domain. They have imposed their more emotional social thinking onto politics, which had historically been governed by more logical, pragmatic ideas.
As they have changed their focus to politics, Women have increasingly neglected social convention and abandoned protocol, weakening our culture. This is why Western Civilization is collapsing.
Let me insist that the flooding of Western nations by incompatible uncivilized cretins is the creation of white females … who believe …
“how can we Westerners be living such a safe, peaceful, prosperous lives … while there are brown people who by the accident of their birth were born into shithole countries. Let’s give their lives a chance by moving to our beautiful countries. Because it’s ’not fair’.”
White Western women did this. Because they ‘think’ emotionally, not logically or analytically. They believe their emotions can ‘fix’ the world. If we are just ‘nice’ to people … they’ll be nice back.
They hate high rents and gridlocked traffic … but say we need to import ALL the hundreds of millions of poor people into our gridlocked cities. They moan about their wages … but get undercut by energetic men from Mumbai who don’t complain. They haven’t thought this out … but no matter … it makes them f-e-e-l good to support unlimited “immigration” of anyone and everyone. “Open Borders!” They cry. Abolish ICE! they cry.
You’re not wrong.
In the social world, emotional thinking is very important. Familial and interfamilial relationships are the backbone of society. The feelings of community, not pragmatism, are the backbone of loyalty, trust, and charity.
In the political world, emotional thinking is catastrophic. Outsiders, both individuals and nations, act primarily in their own interests, and cannot be fully trusted.
The ‘trad relationship’ between women’s strengths and men’s strengths has worked exceedingly well for millennia. We complement each other. At the smallest scale, successful marriages establish a (mostly peaceful) division of labor. You do the things you do well, and I’ll do the other things. But … feminism … and post-feminist communism demand that men step aside … and let a loving woman … such as HER … run the political machinery.
Correct.
Feminism demands that women do everything that men do, even if they are less effective and less happy doing it. Feminism has tried to make women into a poor substitute for men.
Like if you try to substitute a burger-flipper for a brain surgeon. The results are bad and will have long-term but totally predictable repercussions.
“by the accident of their birth were born into shithole countries”
All other things being equal. Sure.
Of course nothing else is equal.
Asmongold’s just rephrasing an old aphorism: “Women f*ck who they want and marry who they can. Men f*vk who they can and marry who they want.”
Two things I’ve learned about most women I’ve gotten to know:
1) If they have an emotional problem, they usually don’t want advice or a solution, they want someone to empathize with them. That’s why they almost always seek out a female friend to talk things over. They want to hear “I know just what you mean, that happened to me, or that happened to so-and-so” and they commiserate.
2) A woman will tolerate or overlook a man’s idiosyncracies or habits and interests that she doesn’t share up to the point when he is fully commited to their relationship, say marriage or cohabitation, and then slowly but surely she will apply pressure to get him to change his ways. It’s called filing off the rough edges.
Just find somebody you can be reasonably content with after you’ve made a life for yourself that you are reasonably content with, so don’t obsess too much and be willing to compromise on some things that you find you can compromise on. There, that’s my ‘relationship advice’.
And I’m beginning to detest the word ‘based’ as much as the word ‘woke’ — yet more perfectly innocent words that have been destroyed by our society’s obsessive-compulsive labelling of everything and putting things into categories that should perhaps remain uncategorical — life is not a science manual that we have to assign phylum and order to everything.
Early in my current 44year marriage … I stressed over the small stuff which created every argument we ever had. After a while (never claimed to be a fast learner) … I just let it all go. That I was never gonna chisel off those rough edges … and it made all the difference.
What I’ve never understood is the woman’s desire to change her man. If she thinks he is so good, then why change him?
We all think/desire to ‘fix’ our partners because we all fall victim to wish casting “if only they did/didn’t ___”. This isn’t a gender specific trait.
What those of us who have decent relationships get is that one can only make minor adjustments, that we went into it with our eyes open (hopefully), and that when one points a finger at someone there are four pointing back at you (that’s why knife hand is important).
I’m just happy mine no longer leaves drill bits in his pants he throws in the dirty laundry hamper (after years of finding them rattling around in the wash) and polices up his socks; he’s just happy I put up my art supplies and don’t bring home stray pets. Marital bliss can be achieved.
I have a habit of leaving my art pens in my pockets. Oh well, I didn’t really like that load of clothes anyway.
Robert, it’s a case of the perfect being the enemy of the good enough.
Far too many woman walk down the aisle at their wedding, taking it all in and saying “Aisle! Altar! Hymn!”
Ginger, or Mary Anne?
Gene Autry _ I’ve Got Spurs That Jingle Jangle Jingle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb6rOIHMy_8
Reality is perhaps more akin to Charlotte Lucas (at lease for all of us looking into the fishbowl of someone else’s relationship, where we are always biased one way or the other):
“Poor Charlotte (Charlie)! It was melancholy to leave her (him) to such society, but she(he) had chosen it with her (his) eyes open.”
Might be time to reflect on the eternal truth of that.
Betty chose Archie over Jughead …
https://youtu.be/49SQ-VMIpgc?si=X3tyvFfAEROXIjsd
This is what happens when people have little or no self-agency – either by having it taken from them by an education system that inculcates situational ethics, i.e., “Going along to get along” or have foolishly given it away. Self affirmation is out-sourced from others, who all too often share the same mindset.
An excellent and very topical read: “Games People Play” by Eric Berne.
As C.F. Volney counselled in “Law of Nature” – (Paraphrased) “Nurture thyself such that you are able to serve others – who in turn, willingly serve you”
Sadly it’s hurt people who hurt other people.