21 Replies to “Rewriting Canada’s History”

  2. “Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole failed, as well. His campaign was weak, he carried no central message, he failed to deliver a full-throated indictment of the government and lacked the fortitude to stand up to the Grits on issues such as the carbon tax, global warming and gun control, instead offering a carbon copy of the Liberal platform.”

    Yup. Lacking fortitude.

    1. Wouldn’t matter what platform OToole ran on.
      He made no effort to defend his platform when the inevitable criticisms where directed at him.

      Part of the problem is that partisan operators tend to let what they see as obvious blind them to the fact that their opponents can be obtuse to the obvious because of their cognitive dissonance.
      Try telling a liberal that Trudeau’s connection to WE was evidently corruption and they will go to great lengths to deny or offer up a justification why his involvement with the WE charity was all above board and beyond reproach.
      The wrong approach is presuming those that have spent years as a liberal will suddenly have a conversion on the road to Damascus on their own.
      The hatred they have toward the right is due to years of indoctrination from those that depend on government patronage for their wear withal.
      The handicap conservatives face is that being on the side of smaller (less costly) government means you are an existential threat to their meal ticket merely for identifying as a conservative. The individual could be conservative in name only and use The Great Leap Forward as a campaign plank and still be deemed a threat to the left.
      So platform don’t mean a thing, they will never vote conservative anyways, but the ones who will won’t if their so designated leader can’t defend his own platform.
      No matter what it is.
      His first mistake was the renege on climate policy. The subject was moot, what was important was that he (a representative of the party members) decided to rule against the members without debate.
      Then on the campaign trail, because he did this as a matter of expediency, he lacked any coherent argument to confront his critics.
      He basically repeated the liberal talking points as proof.

      1. It’s fairly simple, until Conservatives stop running as Liberals they can’t expect to win. At this point Conservatives have no home, they’re continuing to run scared, can’t go boldly forth with Conservative policies, instead they act like nervous Nellies.

        We got exactly the government we deserve,Trudeau can do whatever he wants, no opposition will want to trigger another election any time soon.

        1. Conservatives need a champion.
          A champion would declare what it means to be conservative, and have the ability to not only defend those principles but effectively push back against his critics to demonstrate to conservatives they have someone that will truly represent them.

  3. I would like to see our politicians try to change street names in big cities.
    Every resident on that street would need to do a change of address to Every utilities, banking and governments documentation.
    Not an easy venture for the residents. But our politicians are slimy shits and don’t a crap.

    1. Our town decided to change the house numbers on our street to get them in sinc and it was the same as moving, it was a real pain to have to change everything from all personal documents right down to magazine subscriptions.
      We can fight it but we will not win, it’s an example of how thin the line between democracy and dictatorship really is.

  4. Mischief is important.

    Imagine what the reaction would be if a majority of respondents indicated that the international airport in Toronto needed a name change.
    Any objections should be met with

    If John A needs to be erased because he was PM when the residential schools existed, any other PM that was in office while that program existed is equally guilty.

    1. What could be more offensive than Trudeau? Senior famously tried to get them to end the current system and fully integrate into white society. I believe his last statement when they refused was “Fine, keep your ghettos”.

      1. First place that came to my mind was the Montreal international airport.
        But the survey referred to in the story is specifically for Ontario.

  5. If we’re into changing names, PE Trudeau Airport should have a name change. Because PET was 2nd worst PM, 1st being of course his son. PET brought French/Quebec serfdom to entire Canada + alienated the West + inflicted huge economic crisis because of his idiotic/socialist views.
    But nothing will happen of course, since The Dauphin is Sultan still. On contrary, expect to see even more irony: centers of great moral/ethics value (monasteries?) named after 1st Mother Margaret, after she goes where her loves PET, Fidel etc went.

    1. Never start with the obvious always go for their lesser gods.
      We need a public outcry to force Canadian Steam Ship lines to change the names of its lake freighters.

    2. They did. It was and remains to many, Montreal-Dorval Airport. I will never call it PET Airport…

      There was a huge fuss over wanting to name Calgary International after Stephen Harper International Airport..

  7. From the sex terminology article, we have the perfect description of Prinz Dummkopf: autosexual.

  8. Scanning through the list I had to do a double-take, because my eyes made a Spoonerism out of the link. Sperm Taxidermy? What the devil are they up to now…

    1. I’m reminded of a brief Monty Python bit where Terry Jones’s character says that he’s heard of unisex but he’s never tried it yet.

  10. Canada, the land where the British domesticated the natives by ending their slave taking, inter-tribal genocide, and stone-age subsistence and allowed them to reside in tribal stasis which has become a collection of racial ghettos removed from modern society, condemned to poverty, dependency, collectivism and corruption. Thanks to modern chemo-deterministic nihilism, the former is to be vilified while the later is to be reinforced.

    1. There may be a good thread to be made on the subject of the rule of King George III.

      Near the end of his reign as head of state he succumbed to the ravages of age and dementia.
      Where have I heard this story before?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation