12 Replies to “Break Them Up”

  1. Kudos to this professor for exposing this, Too bad the MSM will bury his testimony.

  2. But you know what?
    It won’t matter.
    Increased Democrat voter turnout of 5% 10% even 20% will not change the result.
    20% of nothing is nothing.

    1. Ironic, isn’t it, that the company that produced that ad, which celebrated defying the status quo, has, since its release, itself become the oppressive norm.

      That’s one reason I’ve gone over to open source software and either homebrew or refurbished computers. I admit, however, that I still use an old iMac because it has programs for which there is no satisfactory equivalent under Unix.

      FreeBSD…. now that is an operating system!

      1. Just got rid of a perfectly good T440P think pad…prefer my ’12 Macbook Pro. Added a 500gb SSD and upgraded the ram…can say what ya want on APPLE (not my fav gang), but this laptop rocks and is IMO, in a league all on its own.

        But I still rock a 5 yr old BBerry Z30 for mobile…and guess what…?? NO 24/7 GOOGLE in yer face presence. No ads – No listening to what yer saying…nuttin. And that my friends, is priceless….

        Break em up..?? Damned straight.

  4. I’m going to listen CBC national news (Radio 1?) first thing tomorrow morning for the headline/story “Liberal academic projects that Hillary got at least 2.6M votes due to American social media/search engine manipulation of the electorate. Orders of magnitude more influence than all known Russian interference. Our apologies to President Trump”. I guess Hillary didn’t really get a majority of the popular vote after all.

  6. Since it costs the companies nothing how much would they charge to do the same for a Canadian election. At typical 10 to 1 U.S. to Canada ratio that would be 200k up to 1M Canadian Liberal votes.

  7. Now explain how this is any different from a major metropolitan daily newspaper having a blatant editorial bias in favour of a particular party, something which was de rigueur until the 1970s.

    This isn’t going to end the way you think it will.

    1. De rigueur perhaps but they at least admitted their bias, their preference and their favouritism. Not so much now. I think that’s huge difference.

    2. 1970’s?

      Helloooooo Toronto Star.

      The Star is still today just a Liberal Party newsletter.

      I truly can’t understand why no Conservative Party has ever requested that the Star’s obvious and all-encompassing bias should not obviously require all their expenses be included in Liberal Party Election Expenses.

      No chance of winning in Liberal Donator- dominated Canadian courts of course, but it would be nice if Conservatives would actually fight back for once and finally start to point out the true extent of Liberal Rot in Canada!

      The Star’s Fake News/constant bias/extreme partisanship drives millions of dumb Ontariowians to the Liberal Party.

  8. see?
    academia can still get it right when it counts.
    do not engage in throwing the baby out with the bathwater,
    do try to raise the little fellow instead of tossing him in the trash because others do so.
    all the recent talk about the Apollo program and world changing progress from it.
    where did the technology come from?
    MIT handled the revolutionary demands to miniaturize the digital cicuitry.
    MIT, an ACADEMIC powerhouse.
    same place Neil graduated from.
    they took care of their own.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation