The “W” Word

John Robson;

Naturally everybody’s against white supremacy. And with solid historical reason given the evil it did over the past 500 years. But for all the horrors of racial slavery, the biggest killers in the 20th century were Mao, Stalin and Hitler, and in no case was skin colour an issue. In the Holocaust, ethnicity was explicit, and in the Holodomor, class warfare intersected with a cultural tradition of individual farming, not communal farming, to make Ukrainians the main target of Stalin’s deliberately engineered famine. And today the biggest threat isn’t the one related to race, and our foreign minister shouldn’t be in denial about it.

They’ll get letters.

h/t Bad News Quillan

32 Replies to “The “W” Word”

  1. I totally support Robson’s comments

    By the way, Hitler, Stalin, Mao were all socialists.

    1. We should always include Pol Pot in that list. He was a keen enviromentalist [sic] you know. Wanted to empty the cities and take Cambodia back to year zero. And he was successful. Be aware of what the Warermelons are capable.

  2. I think these a–holes are prepping the world for the arrest of “Dangerous Canadians/Conservatives”.

    1. I think the Trudeau Liberals are completely saturated with US leftist ideas and politics, trying to graft them onto Canada.

      Also, they will ignore Andy 2% (easy to do) and run against Harper/Ford/Kenney

  3. Oh God… “the horrors of white supremacy” accompanied by a bunch of lame, inaccurate examples; the least of which being slavery but of course it heads the pack. One thing at a time and slavery first; those slaves that Europeans bought from African and Arab slavers would have been far worse off had they been left in the slave markets or sold to Arabs. Not to mention the massive price white American boys paid to free the descendants of these slaves who enjoy a far greater standard of living then if they had never been rounded up by their racial kinsmen in the malaria infested jungles of Africa in the first place. Just try and dispute this simple truth.

    1. Good call …as if slavery was a white supremacy thing. Different animals.
      In my opinion the ruling psychopaths & their sycophants were responsible for the crimes while the vast majority in western nations worked for starvation wages and served as cannon fodder for the same ruling crime families or were victims themselves of wars waged by the crime families and played no role in the slave trade…and yes many whites even fought to free blacks like you say.
      The crime families found all sorts of ways to put people in chains, whites included.

      One could say some sent over in slave ships were better off than some who were left behind but that’s pretty lame…
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIOh1qETRM4

        1. what is the problem with the use of the word “crimes” as in “crimes against humanity” in this context, i.e. slavery ???

          1. Because by calling it a crime you are using inaccurate language and applying your own bias. What is a crime against humanity? That is such an expansive and generalized label, you cannot possibly define it a precise manner. Crimes against humanity simultaneously means everything bad and nothing bad. In this instance, we are discussing the African slave trade as it applies to European involvement Well, the fact is, European involvement was short lived. The argument could also be made, very effectively, that Europeans were far more humane in the treatment of slaves than the Arabs and Africans. That argument would address your “crimes against humanity “

      1. Using the Belgian Congo is a piss poor excuse and only works to reinforce my point since it was Europeans themselves who were outraged by the treatment of the Congolese and eventually put an end to it. Go polish your wraparounds, trim your goatee and selfflagellate a little more, boomer.

      2. At first I took issue with the NP author calling slavery an evil of racist white supremacists. Slavery isn’t a racist institution per se.
        But I can now understand how people would come to see slavery as a racist institution because of those who resort to biased rhetoric in support of the institution, e.g. the trivializing the experience of Africans who were shipped over to the Americas as slaves.

      3. Slavery was more or less universal until the white man’s civiization stopped it.

  4. Whites are the least racist of all ethnic groups in the West. Yet somehow we’re suppose to continue self-flagellating while everyone else* gets to enjoy their racism while pretending to be victims of white supremacy.

    *Most of them coming from cultures that contributed nothing to humanity, ever.

  5. a wee off topic, but considering all things LIEberal, anybody heard any word about a possible upcoming first ministers conference?
    no?
    hmmmm. why would that be? it would be um, erm, um, most, um, er, um, entertaining to um, see, all the, um, newly um, minted conservative premiers um, gang up, um, er, on the sockpuppet.

    ya. Im gonna give my LIEberal mp a call and ask him why no mention of a few days in the hot seat for socksieboy.

    1. hb great point.

      My laugh of the evening as I contemplated it.

      However, I’ll bet Turdeau won’t call one. The PMO will say Turdeau doesn’t meet with misogynistic, homophobic, islamophobia, Nazis.

  6. He’s wrong about the holocaust. The nazis tried to exterminate the Jews based on race. Anyone who has been to the holocaust museum in Washington can confirm this. The nazis spent a massive amount of effort classifying Jewishness – they had charts for things like nose length, shoulder slump and scouting systems for it all.

    Sure there were roots of ethnic hate there as there is with most racism.

    1. Freeland appears to do as much for Canada at the UN as she did for Canada with the trade deal. Has she ever been voted in or always appointed?

    2. Jews are a race? All of the Jewish people I know look at least as Caucasian as me, and I am Irish-German.

  7. Joe, Bill C-51 has some dicey stuff in it :

    “The Bill would also enact the Avoiding Complicity in Mistreatment by Foreign Entities Act. This would create a mechanism for the Governor in Council to issue direction to security and intelligence-mandated departments and agencies prohibiting the disclosure or request of information that would result in a substantial risk of mistreatment by a foreign entity, as well as certain uses of information that was likely obtained through the mistreatment of an individual by a foreign entity.”

    Isn’t that how the Feds keep handing millions to lawfare seeking terrorists? I’m not sure, but this seems to me squishy legislation that puts Canada on the hook for what other countries do. (especially muslim terror training nations or “Canadians” waging jihad internationally)

    More Laws mean less freedom at this point. Each paragraph seems to create new AGENCIES which require more Government poohbahs and a new flock of minions. Enlarging government while decreasing the establishment of private firms who could do almost any Government job with greater efficiency. Govy jobs have no accountability or penalties for massive screwups.

    Does Freeland even read her memos? When I can stand to listen to her, all I hear are Soros puppet talking points. The same points are spouted by EU technocrats and by American democrats. We are bathed in a babbling river of propaganda.

  8. Who cares if they call you alt right, or white supremacist? All it is, is that since everyone is “literally Hitler” (and has been for like a decade now at least), they need new insults to try to Kafka trap you with.

    You can continue to play by their rules, and accept their definition of the language, or you can …

  9. “…good luck denouncing anti-Semitism at the UN. Still, the possibility of genocide if Israel ever lost a war, or the wrong people got nuclear weapons, should be near the top of our security agenda.”

    Genocide? Think bigger.

    The next attempt by the globalists to exterminate the Jews will be the last. Israel has made clear her intention to make her enemies die with her. A few Israeli nukes hitting Moscow or St. Petersburg will set off the Soviet nuclear arsenal—and that will be the end of civilization, if not all life on earth.

    Among the first to be blown to atoms: the globalists themselves, from their front row seats in the world’s financial capitals.

    And, that, I submit to you, is a major reason for the official obsession with “white nationalism.”

    After the Yom Kippur war, our masters needed a scapegoat for their own mistakes who didn’t have the ability to fire an atomic missile into their laps if their masters one day decided to murder them all. Working-class north Americans and Europeans fit the bill nicely.

  10. to put in context Freeland’s tweet of March 28….
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/white-supremacist-nazi-islamophobia-1.5076033

    “Neo-Nazis, white supremacists, ‘incels,’ nativists and radical anti-globalists who resort to violent acts are a threat to the stability of my country and countries around the world,” Freeland said…and adding Islamophobia to the list in another tweet.

    “We cannot hide behind euphemisms that distract from the truth,” she said. “In fact, doing so puts our citizens, especially those from religious minorities and racialized communities, in greater danger.”

    And yet she fails to identify & denounce the perpetrators of the Sri-Lanka attack.
    https://twitter.com/cafreeland/status/1119953667212349440

    The likes of Freeland provide cover for the Islamists and so we have the Sri-Lankan authorities who had prior warnings of the attack not take the threat seriously.

  11. Instead I don’t support Robson sentence. “Colonialism” has been the normality all over the world since men began to form communities; slavery and conquering have been universally present everywhere, and Europe is certainly not the worst – beside the fact that not all withes are Europeans and not all Europeans engaged in colonialism.

    The ideas of a population inalienable right to land and of each human’s dignity have formed slowly and originates precisely from universal religions and preeminently from “white men”‘s thought.

    Communists stand out not only for the magnitude of their ideological disasters, but for the hypocrisy of their supposed superior morality and politics compared to “bourgeois” systems – leading to the unsurpassed mendacity, which is one of their more distinguishing trait.

  12. An extremely effective column by Robson!
    Note his repeated references to the leading statistics of non-white muslims killing other non-white muslims and non-white non muslims.

    White supremacy is a white elephant.

    Whenever I broach the subject of jihad with my unalarmingly shrinking circle of liberal friends I ALWAYS refer to the fact that muslims are the leading victim group.

    Skilful rhetoric involves anticipating the listeners’ reactions and shaping your words to cut them off at the pass; to disarm them. Something Sir Roger woefully failed to do before the attempted assassination.

  13. Ok then, lets do this.
    I need one o deem lib MP’s to tell me which of the following is thee most important crisis of our time.
    Please pick one
    Is it
    The climate?
    White supremacist groups?
    Or the opioid crisis?
    They can explain why one deserves more attention than the others as thee most important existential crisis above all others.
    And do think of the children.

  14. “Bad News Quillan” another closet James Schmitz fan I presume? One of the few mid 20th century SF writers whose work was not made ridiculous or obsolete by advancing technology.

Navigation