18 Replies to ““What difference, at this point, does it make?””

  1. Drudge is also featuring this revelation as top story, but until we actually see what the hacker managed to reveal, there’s just nothing here except anticipation. If hundreds of emails were distributed on the weekend, and today is late Monday, then the headlines for tomorrow better be good or he may have hacked nothing important and we could still be looking at Hillary for POTUS in 2016 instead of MIchelle. Gawd I need a drink either way.

  2. The hacker emails tons of people and that fact leaks out but the contents don’t? Something smells here…

  3. As usual this will go nowhere. MSM won’t touch it for fear of damaging The One, and the people are too busy watching the latest survivor show or having a beer at the union hall.
    But, as Peter says, let us see if there is some meat in this story. Sorry Peta.

  4. I can’t help but think that yet again, the real story here is “WTF are federal government employees with high-level clearances doing with an AOL email account?”

  5. So what is in the e-mails.
    I must say, though, that these superbrains who are leading world diplomacy (sarc) are pretty dumb to use AOL to communicate with their AWOL bosses.

  6. They use AOL accounts so they can talk to each other without having every word archived forever in an offical federal server farm.
    Not working out too well, because every email in the UNIVERSE is being saved by the NSA on their mega server farm AND by Google as well. (Just keep that in mind when emailing your friends. Every email is archived. Every single one.)
    I love it when tyrants stick their own leg in their own bear trap. Smells like Justice.

  7. I wonder if they’ll release the content ever too although maybe if a foreign news source was contacted, they’ll publish them.
    And from an Ace of Spades commenter yesterday re. Hillary’s SSM flipflop for the presidency:
    I thought Hillary’s view on gays was to let them die, undefended, at an embassy annex.
    Posted by: Fritz at March 18, 2013 11:50 AM

  8. I’ll bet the hacker will be a little jumpy whenever he hears a light aircraft, wondering if its someone out for a zip in the family Cessna or if it’s a drone painting an infrared target on him from his body heat.

  9. Provides ready-made justification or the internet anti-anonymity bill the Dems are trying to pass with two previous failures. Even the GOPs will vote or an anti freedom internet bill if they believe their email can be seen by their constituents – secrecy is for the political elite, not the proletariat.

  10. “Just keep that in mind when emailing your friends. Every email is archived. Every single one.”
    It may be safe to assume that, but it’s not technically realistic. E-mail traffic doesn’t just all float through and/or get forwarded to servers the NSA would have access to.

  11. Yeah. I work in this industry and t3h internets Does Not Work Like That.
    If you’re honestly concerned about that sort of thing, set up secure email. It’s not hard.

  12. Which is not to say they can’t sniff a lot of traffic but it still depends where it’s going to/from.
    Indeed, the truly paranoid don’t send plaintext e-mail at all.

  13. The real paranoid don’t even have telephones and they can still get you. Just ask Osama.

  14. Could be BS and could be just useless hacked e-mails.
    I had a chuckle though to see the use of that fake hand scrawl font …. since earlier today that moron Bob Beckle on Fox News was going on about “scanned copies of hand scrawled nots” ….

  15. Have to admit Beckle has a lot of balls to stay on FOX. Can’t deny that.
    Still a deluded retard though.

  16. He’s supposed to be the voice of the left for the “balanced” part. They couldn’t stock enough barf bags to have someone like Sharpton or Shultz on a daily basis.

Navigation