Category: Great Moments In Socialism

Saving The Poor From Obesity

I think our work is done here.

Queen’s is Canadian lead on international team addressing obesity in Mexican children
A new federal government initiative that partners Canadian researchers with researchers in the developing world is investing up to $1.6 million in collaborative research aimed at reducing obesity in Mexican children.
Queen’s collaborators led by Kinesiology and Health Studies researcher, Peter Katzmarzyk, and researchers from the University of Guadalajara in Mexico will address childhood obesity and healthy body weights in Mexico. This multi-disciplinary research will inform the development of programs and policies aimed at combating obesity as it relates to under-nutrition in Mexico and in other developing countries that are beginning to experience similar problems.
“Canada is a world leader in the field of obesity research, and this represents a valuable opportunity for us to share our knowledge and experience with a country that is beginning to experience problems similar to those we’ve already been through,” says Dr. Katzmarzyk.

Queens University – the blogger’s gift that keeps on giving.

First, They Came For Our Comic Book Characters

captain-america.jpg

The cover of the first issue of Captain America* showed Cap socking Hitler with a right cross nearly a year before America declared war on Germany. A champion of American freedom, Cap’s popularity soared during World War II as he battled Nazis and the Japanese with Bucky at his side.
After the war, sales of Captain America dwindled; the title was canceled in 1950. As Bradford Wright details in “Comic Book Nation,” Marvel brought Cap back several years later as a Cold Warrior: “Captain America . . . Commie Smasher.” This time, he and Bucky fought communist agents “who hid behind the privileges of a free society in order to subvert American institutions.” The series sold poorly and was dropped after a few issues.
Captain America changed with the times. He returned in 1964 and found renewed fame, but not as the same rock-jawed, stalwart soldier. In 1969 he was paired with the first African-American superhero, the Falcon. In one small sign of how comics were evolving, the Falcon’s alter ego, Sam Wilson, was a Harlem social worker.

It was the beginning of the end.
Related, from 2003 – Some saw it coming.
h/t

Cracks in the Medicare Monopoly

William Watson notes Canadians’ opinions are beginning to change on Medicare:

There’s a political party in this country, Mario Dumont’s Action democratique du Quebec, that is currently running — in a real election, in Canada’s most statist province — on a reformist platform in health care. It’s not a very detailed platform and Mr. Dumont might run away from it if he ever gets near power, but, for the time being at least, the program says:
– The Supreme Court’s Chaouilli decision was right: People should be allowed to spend their own money on their own health.

Airbust – Great moments in Socialism

Money losing airplane manufacturer announces 10,000 job cuts.
Employees walk off the job to protest:

Workers at the three affected factories in Germany reacted immediately to the announcement by stopping work and heading for the doors, according the union IG Metall. “They’ve had it up to here,” said a union spokesman.
French unions have also warned of possible strikes to protest the savings plan. “It will be a (call to) strike, but perhaps a strike is not enough,” said European works council boss Jean-Francois Knepper on French television earlier Wednesday. “Airbus is following the route of Boeing to more outsourcing.” Work at France’s Meaulte plant came to a halt on Wednesday in anticipation of the restructuring announcement. Following the announcement, some 1,000 workers in Toulouse — where Airbus is headquartered and where final assembly of the A380 takes place — began demonstrating against the job cuts.

That should help. Resisting all attempts to stay competitive with Boeing is sure to work out well in the long run.

UN Kampf

Anne Bayefsky;

A newly released United Nations report epitomizes the foul anti-Semitism which has overtaken the U.N. human-rights machinery. In language reminiscent of Nazi Germany, John Dugard, the U.N.’s “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967,” has announced that Jews seeks racial domination.
[…]
The primary tool of the U.N.’s point-man for whipping up modern-day anti-Semitism is to pillory the Jew as racist extraordinaire. Israel is the evil equivalent to apartheid South Africa. Referring to apartheid 24 times in his report, he proclaims: “Israel’s laws and practices in the OPT certainly resemble aspects of apartheid.” He fails to mention, predictably, that one-fifth of Israel’s population is Arab — citizens who vote and hold seats in the Israeli parliament — while Arab countries are Judenrein. And Israel is the apartheid state?

Committees Of Chavez Control

In this comment thread, Dr. Dawg takes exception to my shot at Hugo Chavez.

“Mass graves?” Come on.

Gentlemen, start your bulldozers!

Faced with an accelerating inflation rate and shortages of basic foods like beef, chicken and milk, President Hugo Chávez has threatened to jail grocery store owners and nationalize their businesses if they violate the country’s expanding price controls.
Food producers and economists say the measures announced late Thursday night, which include removing three zeroes from the denomination of Venezuela’s currency, are likely to backfire and generate even more acute shortages and higher prices for consumers. Inflation climbed to an annual rate of 18.4 percent a year in January, the highest in Latin America and far above the official target of 10 to 12 percent.
Mr. Chávez, whose leftist populism remains highly popular among Venezuela’s poor and working classes, seemed unfazed by criticism of his policies. Appearing live on national television, he called for the creation of “committees of social control,” essentially groups of his political supporters whose purpose would be to report on farmers, ranchers, supermarket owners and street vendors who circumvent the state’s effort to control food prices.

Now Dawg, you were saying?

Birthday Boy

I don’t know how the Progressive Bloggers missed this. It’s so not like them.

So let’s go straight to the party! In case you forgot to pencil it in yourself last week, here’s a roundup of all the festivities from the DPRK news service!
“Speakers at the meeting said the Korean people are making a dynamic advance along the road of socialism, demonstrating the single-minded unity of the leader, the party and people, true to the independent and unique Songun politics pursued by Kim Jong Il.
“Kim Jong Il, possessed of matchless courage and grit, has wisely led the army and people with his correct strategy and tactics and outstanding leadership art, turning the DPRK into a political and military power, they noted.
“They expressed the firm belief that the Korean people would build a great prosperous powerful nation in the near future under his wise leadership.”

Speaking of progressives – Hugo Chavez was too busy nationalizing Venezuelan corporations to attend, and sent his regrets.
One hopes the bulldozer manufacturers aren’t foolish enough to pull out. The Venezuela mass grave industry is poised for explosive growth.

If It Kills One Child

The high costs of risk aversion are coming home to roost with a Helmet Generation long on self-importance and short on leadership;

Teachers who refuse to let children take risks are undermining the economy, a former director general of the Confederation of British Industry says today.
In a savage attack on the health and safety culture in schools, Sir Digby Jones says that a generation of “cotton wool kids” are applying for jobs without any leadership or entrepreneurial skills.
[…]
In the report, he says there have been numerous examples of “excessive risk aversion” in schools which must be stamped out if children are to develop properly. Head teachers have forced children to wear goggles when playing conkers and outlawed the backstroke in case pupils hit each other in the swimming pool, he says.
A survey of science teachers recently revealed that 87 per cent had not allowed students to take part in experiments in case they were injured.
Sir Digby says: “We hear of school sports days where there are no winners for fear of causing permanent damage to the self-esteem and emotional development of the ‘losers’. One of my colleagues at the CBI told me that when his eight-year-old was winning a race he was instructed to hold back to give his fellow competitors the chance to catch up.
“There have even been reports of schools banning ball games and teachers refusing to referee matches for fear of the consequences of injury.”
According to Sir Digby, the prevailing culture of risk aversion “is potentially fatal to our economics and social wellbeing”.
CBI research revealed a third of employers had to train 16-year-olds up to an acceptable standard of literacy and numeracy in their first year of employment. Two thirds said the teenagers lacked self-management skills and three quarters said they did not have a basic understanding of business and finance.
Last week, a report by the Association of Graduate Recruiters said that many vacancies were being left unfilled because even academically bright students did not have the necessary “soft skills”, such as communication and leadership.
“If we never took a risk our children would not learn to walk, climb stairs, ride a bicycle or swim; business would not develop innovative new products, move into new markets and create wealth for all; scientists would not experiment and discover; we would not have great art, literature, music and architecture,” says Sir Digby.
He adds that by attempting to remove risk, “all adults are colluding in a shameful deceit; not only are we regulating the lifeblood of enterprise out of people, we are also teaching the next generation of wealth creators that risk, failure and competition do not exist.”

Via Peaktalk.
SDA Flashback – The Risk Takers.

Last Refuge of The Bigot

Western Europe’s America Problem;

Ambivalence, antipathy, and resentment toward and about the United States have made up an important component of European culture since the American Revolution, thus way before America became the world’s “Mr. Big” — the proverbial 800-pound gorilla — and a credible rival to Europe’s main powers, particularly Britain and France. In recent years, following the end of the cold war, and particularly after 9/11, ambivalence in some quarters has given way to unambiguous hostility. Animosity toward the United States has migrated from the periphery and become a respectable part of the European mainstream.
Negative sentiments and views have been driven not only — or even primarily — by what the United States does, but rather by an animus against what Europeans have believed that America is. While the politics, style, and discourse of the Bush terms — and of President Bush as a person — have undoubtedly exacerbated anti-American sentiment among Europeans and fostered a heretofore unmatched degree of unity between elite and mass opinion in Europe, they are not anti-Americanism’s cause. Indeed, a change to a center-left administration in Washington, led by a Democratic president, would not bring about its abatement, let alone its disappearance.
Anti-Americanism constitutes a particular prejudice that renders it not only acceptable but indeed commendable in the context of an otherwise welcome discourse that favors the weak. Just as in the case of any prejudice, anti-Americanism also says much more about those who hold it than about the object of its ire and contempt. But where it differs markedly from “classical” prejudices — such as anti-Semitism, homophobia, misogyny, and racism — is in the dimension of power. Jews, gays and lesbians, women, and ethnic minorities rarely if ever have any actual power in or over the majority populations or the dominant gender of most countries. However, the real, existing United States does have considerable power, which has increasingly assumed a global dimension since the end of the 19th century, and which has, according to many scholarly analyses, become unparalleled in human history.
While other public prejudices, particularly against the weak, have — in a fine testimony to progress and tolerance over the past 40 years — become largely illegitimate in the public discourse of most advanced industrial democracies (the massive change in the accepted language over the past three decades in those societies about women, gays, the physically challenged, minorities of all kinds, and animals, to name but a few, has been nothing short of fundamental), nothing of the sort pertains to the perceived and the actually strong. Thus anti-Americanism not only remains acceptable in many circles but has even become commendable, a badge of honor, and perhaps one of the most distinct icons of what it means to be a progressive these days.

Required reading.
Although the article is written from a European perspective, one can’t help but hear its echo in the pervasive “damned if they do, damned if they don’t” anti-Americanism that has mestasticized into the highest levels of the Canadian political discourse.

Affirmative Autocracy

When women can’t win nomination the old fashioned way, enter the Liberal sugar-daddy;

Liberal Leader Stephane Dion is prepared to take “extraordinary measures” to boost the ranks of women candidates in the next election, including barring men from seeking nominations in some ridings.
During last year’s leadership race, Dion promised that under his watch at least a third of the party’s candidates in the next election would be women.
But campaign organizers have concluded that the ambitious goal will be impossible to reach without some intervention to secure nominations for female candidates.

This guy is just a gift that keeps on giving…

“We have long memories”

Garth Wood;

Johnathan Ross: A nice post today. As one of the unfortunates who had to live through the NEP, allow me to try and expand a bit on why Albertans in particular are wary of Federal interference in Alberta’s constitutionally-protected resource base.
First, others here have said “they remember stories of suicides.” I don’t remember stories: I remember actual suicides. I knew people who lost their homes (some sold them for $1.00, others simply walked away), I knew couples that declared personal bankruptcy and whose marriages dissolved, and I remember standing in an unemployment line at the Edmonton Northwest UI office, as well as spending the better part of the next year looking for work. I never found any; instead, I went and applied for student loans and went back to post-secondary education (it was either that or starve). What I remember most is that none of the above tragedies were necessitated by some fundamental aspect of the existing economic milieu — they were all precipitated by the divine fiat of an arrogant, vainglorious fool of a Prime Minister with an astonishingly weak understanding of economics and the limits of government intervention. It’s little wonder that there are people out west who would like nothing better than the chance to urinate on PET’s final resting place.
I also remember the blinding speed with which the damage was done — from the announcement to the commencement of the meltdown of Alberta’s economy was only a matter of a few weeks. For some people, unemployment was almost instantaneous — I knew individuals who were terminated by the end of the week of the announcement, and I heard about others who were fired the very next day. Not that it helped their erstwhile employers survive; they too soon went under.
The NEP, for all the damage it did, is not the central issue, however. For many Albertans, the NEP simply represented the truth of the statement “The best guide to future behaviour is past behaviour.” This is almost infallible in areas like the psychology of marketing, and it’s a pretty good guide to other areas of life, too. The NEP represented the latest (and to date, the most profound and successful) attempt to economically rape the residents of Alberta for the benefit of Central Canada. In essence, people killed themselves because Trudeau wanted to deliver gasoline and heating oil to the residents of Ontario and Quebec for a few measly cents less per litre.
If they get the chance, what would the Liberals do next? “The best guide to future behaviour is past behaviour.” Unfortunately, this is a pretty good guide for how Albertans are likely to respond to another NEP-style meddling. Contrary to popular perceptions in Central Canada, most Albertans (and I include myself, a self-declared “reluctant separatist” in this) see themselves as more magnanimous and more patriotic than Centralers, and thus more willing to allow the Feds to interfere if it’s either “good for Canada” or if fighting the Feds would cause undue hardship and suffering for other Canadians, even those we perceive as being profoundly ungrateful for the massive (and per capita, massively disproportionate) economic contributions we’ve made to Confederation.
I have no idea whether this attitude of deference on the part of Albertans is changing, but I do know that we have long memories, and there’s an entire generation of people in Alberta who have much more power and sophistication than a quarter of a century ago (age and experience is actually good for something!). NEP II, in any form whatsoever, would be unlikely to pass muster in the same way that the original ultimately did.
And if you love Canada, that’s not a good thing.

Biodiesel – Another Kyoto Success story

We are often lectured at how those more enlightened Europeans are ahead of us on Kyoto. Partly, this is true, as they’ve engaged in more of those money sucking socialist schemes than we have so far, but the Suzuki types are constantly cajoling us to imitate them.
So, by their own evaluation, how is it working for them so far?
Well, let’s look at this Biodiesel initiative:

Continue reading

To The Rescue

No safety vacuum is too small for the Nanny State crusaders to take up as a cause;

Until this month, or certainly until about the last decade, it would not have occurred to anyone that tobogganing was such a peril-strewn venture as to require special protective equipment, let alone that every one of the 6 million or so Canadians who might want to take the sled out for a spin should be compelled by law to buckle up. A search for “tobogganing and helmets” on Infomart’s vast database of Canadian publications turns up just one hit prior to 1990; 59 hits from 1990 to 1999, and 98 since then.

But if the life of just one child is saved!
Related – “Say you’re a single doctor; you get to know your patient; and through the patient, you get to know the patient’s sister, whom you find yourself romantically interested in. Can you ask her out (either while you’re seeing the patient, or for two years afterwards)?”

Milking The Cow

Bob Wood;

The following figures were taken from the Canadian Dairy Commission website dated in 2006:
Provincial Shares of Milk Share Quotas (MSQ) for Industrial Milk
Province / Percentage
Nfld & Labrador 0.3
PEI 1.8
Nova Scotia 1.1
New Brunswick 1.2
Quebec 46.5
Ontario 31.2
Manitoba 3.6
Saskatchewan 2.6
Alberta 6.3
British Columbia 5.5

Navigation