The narrative we’ve been fed the past few days is that all of the violence and looting have mostly been legitimate protests and that any violence and looting is the result of white supremacists. Late yesterday afternoon the downtown core of idyllic Walnut Creek, California was attacked by a small gang of “youths”. Please look here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here and let your own eyes decide the depth of sorrow and grief these folks feel for George Floyd.

Fifty Secret Service officers were injured Sunday night by “protesters” and the Leftists across social media are lovin’ it!

Lest we forget

I know a lot of SDA’ers don’t like Tim Pool but this is too important not to discuss:

Here’s a longer discussion with Sargon of Akkad and others around the world.

Kate posted about this a few days ago but i would like to look at it from a broader pespective.

Imagine receiving an email or phone call from your Internet or mobile phone provider chastising you for recent political comments you made on SDA or elsewhere. Would you be surprised or do you think they would have every right to do so? What would you actually do if this happened?

Given that Twitter and Facebook and other social media platforms have become the de facto public square of old, does it seem correct to you that highly biased employees at these companies can regulate what you post on them? The narrative to date has been that “they are private companies so they can do anything they want”. Is that really correct?

An investigative reporter has revealed some interesting facts about the Head of Site Integrity at Twitter. Here’s the fellow’s Twitter feed. Of course, he’s fully entitled to any personal opinions of his own but should his political biases be allowed to infringe on the speech of others?