Author: David

Bill’s Wife

The Republicans have been lucky the last couple of primaries. Lots of competition and for good or bad, the candidate chosen by the people was their nominee.
Clinton didn’t plan for that kind of campaign. Her whole campaign to this point has been about nothing: no waves, no press, no questions. Her team expected to cruise through the nominations because no Democrat would have the guts to take her on. Who wants to get on the bad side of ‘the Clinton machine’?
Not so fast, says Sanders. It looks like the Democrat voters might be agreeing with him.

And this explains the polls.

The flake proves the label; the Opposition promotes stability.

Trudeau’s speech was unremarkable in its delivery. But the content, and the subsequent question-and-answer session with reporters, were anything but. The Liberal leader unveiled a series of 32 proposals, many of which singly, if implemented, would transform Canadian democracy.

vs.

Small-business tax cuts, support for manufacturing, infrastructure spending; it was fare of the kind you’d have heard in a speech 20 years ago from a federal Liberal minister. In effect, Mulcair is making an unabashed play for the moderate, conservative centre.

Yep

Carrie_Nation - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrie_Nation
Pretty much what Ace said.
“And yet, when Anita Sarkesian makes pretty much the same whiny, bitchy ankle-bites, but this time casting them as arguments from the left, rather than the right, the whole Kotaku Klaque praises her as a serious scholar and Voice of a New Censorious Generation.”*

Now Is The Time At SDA When We Juxtapose!

Wikipedia:

There are many health care professionals, especially those concerned with bioethics, who are opposed to PAS due to the detrimental effects that the procedure can have with regard to vulnerable populations. This argument is known as the “slippery slope”.[10] This argument encompasses the apprehension that once PAS is initiated for the terminally ill it will progress to other vulnerable communities, namely the disabled, and may begin to be used by those who feel less worthy based on their demographic or socioeconomic status. In addition, vulnerable populations are more at risk of untimely deaths because, “patients might be subjected to PAD without their genuine consent”.[11] However, recent studies claim that the available evidence suggests that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide might actually decrease the prevalence of involuntary euthanasia.[12]

Belgium:

Thousands of elderly people have been killed by their own GPs without ever asking to die under Belgium’s euthanasia laws, an academic report said yesterday.
It said that around one in every 60 deaths of a patient under GP care involves someone who has not requested euthanasia.

From the other side.

Via Zerohedge.
Glenn Grenwald responds.

The Sunday Times article is even worse because it protects the officials they’re serving with anonymity. The beauty of this tactic is that the accusations can’t be challenged. The official accusers are being hidden by the journalists so nobody can confront them or hold them accountable when it turns out to be false. The evidence can’t be analyzed or dissected because there literally is none: they just make the accusation and, because they’re state officials, their media-servants will publish it with no evidence needed. And as is always true, there is no way to prove the negative. It’s like being smeared by a ghost with a substance that you can’t touch.

This one’s for you Oz. 🙂

Oh, crap.

It’s official. The silly season has started; this buffoon is going to announce.


Update: A link for everyone who has forgotten who Trump really is.

Cold Camembert and Broken Crackers

You broke it, you bought it. Some people are more equal than others.

People “should not be forced to live on property with brown lawns, golf on brown courses or apologize for wanting their gardens to be beautiful,” Yuhas fumed recently on social media. “We pay significant property taxes based on where we live,” he added in an interview. “And, no, we’re not all equal when it comes to water.”

The utopia of failed social states continues unabated.

Navigation