Our politicians have made it abundantly clear that they HATE THINKERS AND PROBLEM SOLVERS!
They’ve built a broken fantasy world with a currency and exchange system that is corrupt and broken.
Following their narrative imposed multiple decades ago and enforced by penalties…
If your not a follower then our politicians will deem you a traitor to their corruption.
One of the more amazing things that I was contemplating this morning is materials and structures in which wood isn’t a very stable product to use for a long term project. It rots, isn’t structurally sound under pressure and can’t take heavy pressure without crushing or shattering…
Fascism is socialism limited to a nation, namely National Socialism (abbreviated in German as Nazi). This in opposition to Marxism which was socialism shared by all people (think Imagine by John Lennon).
The opposite of Fascism and Marxism is is conservatism, the belief that God’s laws, as given in the Bible, are good and should be conserved.
Well I’d disagree there. National Socialism is socialism limited to a nation, be such a nation defined by race or some other polity. But fascism is socialism which does not bother to OWN the means of production, simply control them.
“There are two breeds of Bolshevism…..there is nothing to choose between the philosophies of Moscow and Berlin.”
Duff Cooper, British politician, August 23, 1939.
“The opposite of Fascism and Marxism is is conservatism”… Fascism flanks communism as one of the variants of statism (socialism is the other) that allows private ownership of the means of production but under the thumb of the state. Conservatives are nested in the mushy middle zone between statism and Libertarianism (the more accurate opposite of Fascism and Marxism). Fascism (masked in end-state democracy) is the dominant system in the world today.
Nazism is Fascism with a distinct racial overtone. The original fascism came out of Italy with Mussolini. A darling of the left back then and ex-Socialist.
Socialism is government in the interest of the wider overall society (historically most government has been more or less frankly in the interest of a single family or small group of families). Marxism is socialism that sees society in terms of classes, defined by their relation to the means of production, and considers the industrial working class as having interests closest to those of the wider society as a whole. Fascism is the variant form of Marxism in which the non-productive classes are regarded as effectively constituting society, and government is conducted in their interest. Nazism is the variant of Marxism in which the nation – in the strict biological sense – is regarded as the wider society, and the nation’s interests prevail over those of any particular class, all of which are part of the nation anyway. All these philosophies are concerned with society, and not with the individual in society, and are thus antithetical to liberalism.
This is why anyone with a sense of national identity gets tagged as a Nazi. Anyone who repudiates the authority of the intelligentsia gets tagged as a Fascist. From a Marxist point of view, those are the identifying features.
Well this is what I support but I am not a fascist.
On globalism: “We support a system of free cooperation and competition among nation-states . . . But we oppose transferring the authority of elected governments to transnational or supranational bodies.”
I am a “garden Nazi” and a “garbage Nazi”.
Does that count?
I think i know where you are coming from.
If you live in a rural area and haul your own garbage you have to deal with a dump Nazi. Usually it’s some busybody who seems to make up dozens of rules why they shouldn’t do their job and take your garbage or at a minimum espousing a myriad of stupid rules for the entertainment of all. Surprisingly I have met dump Nazis who can do their job without saying a word.
What about a post about Canadians who naively believe they are hardcore conservatives because they vote centrist CPC?
Woohoo! I’m a fascist, you’re a fascist, we’re a fascist, wouldn’t you like to be a fascist too?
Two words. INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM. Nothing else matters.
As it is today, everybody that is interested in the affairs of men, knows that the Global Socialists like Von Drehle are, in fact, those fascists that they would like to throw the designation on others to shut up.
It is pretty much simple as that.
The sad part is that the masses would never know or think how the fascist, the GLOZIS operate.
Being old and with experience, one has time to reflect, consider and clearly recognize the fascists of today.
They, the political/media cartel complex are, in fact, the new fascists of old in a veil of wokeness.
As an aside, certain Rempel Gardner, one of the Global Socialists has decided not to run for UCP leader in Alberta, which decision is whole heartedly approved by your agent here.
Of course she is as much “Conservative” as Notley who she approves of.
The local media cartel loves her for saying those thing that she says, like the UCP is divided and should look up the socialist extremists of the NDP, to see how the diktat works.
As if Danielle Quisling wasn’t bad enough. Isn’t Rempel the leader of the Trotskyite wing of the Conservatives?
Vito
“..They, the political/media cartel complex are, in fact, the new fascists of old in a veil of wokeness…”
Very well put ….and up here in Canuckistan..?? bordering on National Socialism.
Them: “your a facsist!”
Me: “you’re”
Them: “huh?!?”
Nothing in there about individual rights, which seems odd.
Nothing in there about individual rights, which seems odd.
‘Antifa – antifascists too stupid to realize that they are the fascists’
will get you blocked on the CBC and (formerly) the Huff Post
One of Mussolini’s justification for totalism was that the common people were too stupid to know what was good for them and needed to be led by their betters. So who are todays fascists?
Orson’s Law:
1. If they accuse you of something; they are already doing it.
2. If they warn you of something; they want you to identify the weaknesses in their plan.
3. If you accomplish something; they will take the credit.
4.. If you earn something; they move to claim ownership.
5. If you espouse to always be truthful; they claim that truth is bigotry.
6. If you succeed within the rule of law; those laws need to be changed.
7. If you document their hypocrisy; they resort to name calling and avoid the topic at all costs.
8. If you document their illegality; they charge you with the documented crime.
9. If you excel professionally; you have an unfair advantage and must forfeit your proceeds to the less motivated.
10. If you agree with the validity of any of the above; then you are the problem and must be compromised by any means necessary to propagate their opinion.
Much like Caligula’s Laws:
1) create fake issue to get elected by low information voters
2) fake data to promote how bad issue is
3) create bureaucracy to fight issue
4) collect tax dollars
5) scatter tax dollars to friends and family
6) announce (and re-announce, and re-re-announce) worthless projects and goals
7) don’t meet goals
8) blame your enemies for failure
9) increase size of bureaucracy and re-set goals
10) repeat until re-elected
I’m guessing this means they wore out racist and had to find a new word to replace it.
The difference between fascists and communists is like the difference between the Crips and Bloods. Two gangs both fighting over the same turf.
Love your laws!
I just have one.
It’s all bullshit until proven.
I was in the Military and the equipment I used was of excellent quality as it could be used multiple times before it fails…
Today’s Military, not so much. Using stronger and yet lighter weight has created a fracturing problem as the equipment is brittle to shocking and multiple use…
So, who do you think has the better equipment today when breakage is a huge problem in the field of battle.
Our politicians have made it abundantly clear that they HATE THINKERS AND PROBLEM SOLVERS!
They’ve built a broken fantasy world with a currency and exchange system that is corrupt and broken.
Following their narrative imposed multiple decades ago and enforced by penalties…
If your not a follower then our politicians will deem you a traitor to their corruption.
One of the more amazing things that I was contemplating this morning is materials and structures in which wood isn’t a very stable product to use for a long term project. It rots, isn’t structurally sound under pressure and can’t take heavy pressure without crushing or shattering…
Fascism is socialism limited to a nation, namely National Socialism (abbreviated in German as Nazi). This in opposition to Marxism which was socialism shared by all people (think Imagine by John Lennon).
The opposite of Fascism and Marxism is is conservatism, the belief that God’s laws, as given in the Bible, are good and should be conserved.
Well I’d disagree there. National Socialism is socialism limited to a nation, be such a nation defined by race or some other polity. But fascism is socialism which does not bother to OWN the means of production, simply control them.
“There are two breeds of Bolshevism…..there is nothing to choose between the philosophies of Moscow and Berlin.”
Duff Cooper, British politician, August 23, 1939.
“The opposite of Fascism and Marxism is is conservatism”… Fascism flanks communism as one of the variants of statism (socialism is the other) that allows private ownership of the means of production but under the thumb of the state. Conservatives are nested in the mushy middle zone between statism and Libertarianism (the more accurate opposite of Fascism and Marxism). Fascism (masked in end-state democracy) is the dominant system in the world today.
Nazism is Fascism with a distinct racial overtone. The original fascism came out of Italy with Mussolini. A darling of the left back then and ex-Socialist.
Socialism is government in the interest of the wider overall society (historically most government has been more or less frankly in the interest of a single family or small group of families). Marxism is socialism that sees society in terms of classes, defined by their relation to the means of production, and considers the industrial working class as having interests closest to those of the wider society as a whole. Fascism is the variant form of Marxism in which the non-productive classes are regarded as effectively constituting society, and government is conducted in their interest. Nazism is the variant of Marxism in which the nation – in the strict biological sense – is regarded as the wider society, and the nation’s interests prevail over those of any particular class, all of which are part of the nation anyway. All these philosophies are concerned with society, and not with the individual in society, and are thus antithetical to liberalism.
This is why anyone with a sense of national identity gets tagged as a Nazi. Anyone who repudiates the authority of the intelligentsia gets tagged as a Fascist. From a Marxist point of view, those are the identifying features.
Well this is what I support but I am not a fascist.
On globalism: “We support a system of free cooperation and competition among nation-states . . . But we oppose transferring the authority of elected governments to transnational or supranational bodies.”
I am a “garden Nazi” and a “garbage Nazi”.
Does that count?
I think i know where you are coming from.
If you live in a rural area and haul your own garbage you have to deal with a dump Nazi. Usually it’s some busybody who seems to make up dozens of rules why they shouldn’t do their job and take your garbage or at a minimum espousing a myriad of stupid rules for the entertainment of all. Surprisingly I have met dump Nazis who can do their job without saying a word.
What about a post about Canadians who naively believe they are hardcore conservatives because they vote centrist CPC?
Woohoo! I’m a fascist, you’re a fascist, we’re a fascist, wouldn’t you like to be a fascist too?
Two words. INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM. Nothing else matters.
As it is today, everybody that is interested in the affairs of men, knows that the Global Socialists like Von Drehle are, in fact, those fascists that they would like to throw the designation on others to shut up.
It is pretty much simple as that.
The sad part is that the masses would never know or think how the fascist, the GLOZIS operate.
Being old and with experience, one has time to reflect, consider and clearly recognize the fascists of today.
They, the political/media cartel complex are, in fact, the new fascists of old in a veil of wokeness.
As an aside, certain Rempel Gardner, one of the Global Socialists has decided not to run for UCP leader in Alberta, which decision is whole heartedly approved by your agent here.
Of course she is as much “Conservative” as Notley who she approves of.
The local media cartel loves her for saying those thing that she says, like the UCP is divided and should look up the socialist extremists of the NDP, to see how the diktat works.
As if Danielle Quisling wasn’t bad enough. Isn’t Rempel the leader of the Trotskyite wing of the Conservatives?
Vito
“..They, the political/media cartel complex are, in fact, the new fascists of old in a veil of wokeness…”
Very well put ….and up here in Canuckistan..?? bordering on National Socialism.
Them: “your a facsist!”
Me: “you’re”
Them: “huh?!?”
Nothing in there about individual rights, which seems odd.
Nothing in there about individual rights, which seems odd.
‘Antifa – antifascists too stupid to realize that they are the fascists’
will get you blocked on the CBC and (formerly) the Huff Post
One of Mussolini’s justification for totalism was that the common people were too stupid to know what was good for them and needed to be led by their betters. So who are todays fascists?
Orson’s Law:
1. If they accuse you of something; they are already doing it.
2. If they warn you of something; they want you to identify the weaknesses in their plan.
3. If you accomplish something; they will take the credit.
4.. If you earn something; they move to claim ownership.
5. If you espouse to always be truthful; they claim that truth is bigotry.
6. If you succeed within the rule of law; those laws need to be changed.
7. If you document their hypocrisy; they resort to name calling and avoid the topic at all costs.
8. If you document their illegality; they charge you with the documented crime.
9. If you excel professionally; you have an unfair advantage and must forfeit your proceeds to the less motivated.
10. If you agree with the validity of any of the above; then you are the problem and must be compromised by any means necessary to propagate their opinion.
Much like Caligula’s Laws:
1) create fake issue to get elected by low information voters
2) fake data to promote how bad issue is
3) create bureaucracy to fight issue
4) collect tax dollars
5) scatter tax dollars to friends and family
6) announce (and re-announce, and re-re-announce) worthless projects and goals
7) don’t meet goals
8) blame your enemies for failure
9) increase size of bureaucracy and re-set goals
10) repeat until re-elected
I’m guessing this means they wore out racist and had to find a new word to replace it.
The difference between fascists and communists is like the difference between the Crips and Bloods. Two gangs both fighting over the same turf.
Love your laws!
I just have one.
It’s all bullshit until proven.
I was in the Military and the equipment I used was of excellent quality as it could be used multiple times before it fails…
Today’s Military, not so much. Using stronger and yet lighter weight has created a fracturing problem as the equipment is brittle to shocking and multiple use…
So, who do you think has the better equipment today when breakage is a huge problem in the field of battle.