Click on the image to go to the poll. The “less” vote is already leading by a wide margin, but in this there’s no such thing as too much going wrong. (h/t Other Stan)
Update — it appears the poll closed a few hours early. Funny, that.
Click on the image to go to the poll. The “less” vote is already leading by a wide margin, but in this there’s no such thing as too much going wrong. (h/t Other Stan)
Update — it appears the poll closed a few hours early. Funny, that.
Done.
Opinion stayed the same.
I love this game. Can we do another?
Loaded question. “Are you more or less in favour”…implying I was ever in favour of it in the first place?
Exactly, “opinion has stayed the same” doesn’t tell anything about what your opinion is.
Yep. It’s a PUSH poll. Sadly, I was not pushed around by the soyboy who wrote the question, and instead SHOVED my answer right up his twat.
Yes. It’s a PUSH poll. No matter how you answer it, it can be spun as people being receptive toward a carbon tax.
There is no option to answer “totally against it from start to finish”.
GEORGE CARLIN – THE PLANET IS FINE
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2UpMwdjwiGI
I suppose I could have voted for “Less” but that would require my current opinion of this tax to be lower than the value of zero I originally held.
So I voted “no change”. As stated above, the question is rigged so that any answer can be interpreted as holding some greater or lesser favorable view of the tax.
They may have figured out a way to limit responses from other locations. It let me vote but then wouldn’t show me the results.
I got both from Oz
I voted less, but seriously I don’t see how I could be less in favour of it than my previous position that it is worth breaking the country up over it.
I clicked on the pic, and was taken to a page where the question was, “Have you taken Uber yet?”
Either I went to the wrong page, or Somebody has changed the question. Not getting the results they wanted?
Looks like they shut the poll down.
You have to look at previous polls to get the results, the final was 68% against (or in this case less enthusiastic…)
I couldn’t even access the previous polls page. It kept coming back to the Uber poll page.
It is impossible to be “less in favor” of the gov’t carbon tax, than I was, say, in 1980, for example.
I’d prefer to have the gas, electricity, and water turned off at the Parliament buildings, rather than pay $10 more tax.
Ouch, this is going to hurt their slice of Justin’s $650million enticement.
some polls require one to contemplate the concept of a *negative* distance,
the question and answer choices(?) are so fcuking LOADED.
the concept of *negative* distance. think about that, it is NOT the same as ‘going in the other direction’,
it is a concept that one can be at a point in which distance, gets kinda ‘sucked up’ like in a black hole.
fcuk. no wonder I was the ‘odd kid’ in grade school, thinking in these terms instead of
scheming to be ‘at bat’ first. I wonder what became of all those cute ‘star athletes’ that
got their girlfriends to do their math assignment.
More
148 (11 %)
Less
921 (68 %)
Opinion has stayed the same
285 (21 %)
Kate- set up your own poll of-
Are you in favour of CTV carrying water for the Liberal Carbon Tax Boondoggle?
and then submit the results back to them (you’d find a way) to expose their bias.
Maxime Bernier
@MaximeBernier
Globalist Trudeau committed $2.65B of our money in 2015 to fight “climate change” in developing countries.
Globalist Scheer said today we have “an obligation” to help other countries reduce their emissions.
How much will he send to 3rd world dictators?
https://mobile.twitter.com/MaximeBernier/status/1128839567174492163
Canada commits $2.65-billion to climate-change funding
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government announced an increase in Canadian funding for developing countries, putting in $2.65-billion over five years.
The money is a key element of international climate change talks: Nations agreed at the Copenhagen summit that by 2020, wealthier nations would transfer $100-billion to poorer ones to fund climate policies.
Who said this today?
“Canada has ‘an obligation’ not just to reduce our own emissions… but also to help other countries cut theirs.”
Justin Trudeau ❌
Elizabeth May ❌
Jagmeet Singh ❌
Andrew Scheer ✅
-> Under Scheer, more $ wasted here AND ABROAD.
https://mobile.twitter.com/MaximeBernier/status/1128833413446885376
Scheer’s climate plan will look at how Canada can cut emissions elsewhere
https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/canada-news-pmn/scheer-says-trudeau-is-a-hypocrite-who-is-using-climate-change-as-distraction
FYI, Trudeau is smarter than anyone who voted for him.
Let that sink in.
No matter what level of stupid he rises to, he can always be reelected, because there are enough Canadians that are more stupid.
Canada imposes selective carbon tax,well not a tax when in court.
Meanwhile Canada burns coal,in its natural setting,with zero effort to extinguish these “Nasty fossil fuel , carbon pollution spewing , nonproductive hell holes.
How can Gang Green claim to care,yet let these evil sulpher pits smoulder unchecked?
Hypocrisy is their name.
Now I realize most of these “natural ” burning coal veins are located in inaccessible area of Canada, but that is no excuse for a nation that is willing to beggar its taxpayers to “Reduce pollution”.
We must build roads and fight these foul pits of pollution.
But I would settle for air dropping bags of waste water on top of them.
Less is the only answer, every time I think of the Federal Carbon Tax,I support it less.
Now I never supported it at all to begin with,but now I advocate a fitting end to all who tax air and seek to impose their hysteria at my cost.
The average human is what? 70% water and we have no end of freeloaders,useless eaters and “helpers”…
The problem solves itself.
I love the picture of steam (water vapor) coming out o f the smokestacks.