What’s the point of showing photo ID at the boarding gate…
…when one cannot tell who some other people are (with video)?..
13 Replies to “Who are you?”
“Flynn’s communication with Air Canada and his video posting have resulted in a threatened lawsuit from the airline”
Thus proving the Air Canada motto,
“we’re not happy until your not happy”
is still the modus operendi for our beloved people’s airline
This is bizarre when one considers:
……that tinting on windows (windshield and drivers side-windows) must allow recognition from a distance of 30 feet in normal daylight(4 lux).
……wearing a disguise is a criminal code offense.
No shirt, no shoes, no face, no service.
For the record: wearing a disguise is not a criminal code offence. Wearing a disguise with intent is a criminal code offence, per §351(2): “Every one who, with intent to commit an indictable offence, has his face masked or coloured or is otherwise disguised is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years” (emphasis mine).
thisis just the muzzies way of subjugating the host to proove to the world that tey are indeed taking over not with guns and war ..more of a subtle war with ideology,and political correctness they are tring to force there will upon the western nations . i say we round em all up even the good ones and punt em all out of here and start the process all over again . And d a much better job of screening them like at least four generations of history MUST be provided and no criminal or terrorist links found what so ever.
Also a clear understanding and command of the english language and a willingness to work and an enthusiasm about being in a free democratic society. Nothing but a complete assimilation to our way of living here in canada will be accepted that is the kind of immigrant i can deal with in my country .
As well we must also provide our citizens the ability to provide for a family with only one income period. Not be poor on one income but able to survive and live quit well on a single income so that the white,black ,what ever can have kids and can have them others stay home if they so choose. will be back
sorry gotta go
Paul in calgary
Vίtruvius, try walking into a bank with a mask on.Then try explaining to the tactical squad (after they knock you to the ground, hand cuff you and place you under arrest..) that you had no intent to rob the bank, but merely enjoyed standing around in financial institutions in disguise to while away your time.
I guarantee you will be charged, convicted and do jail time.
Not like I needed another reason, but just add this one to the list of why I don’t fly Air Canada. The sheer Stupidity (capitalization intentional) of the AC staff who allowed this to occur is beyond the pale. I’d say they should be fired, but I have no doubt they were simply following PC protocols as established by the Stupid management of AC.
Then, AC has the gall to respond not with a press release outlining revised security procedures, but with a lawsuit against the whistle blower. Talk about whistling past the graveyard. Were I the videotaping passenger, I would have likely not boarded the plane and demanded AC put me up in a hotel for the night to await the next flight. Bless him for having the foresight to tape the incident which no doubt unfolded quickly.
This is yet another pathetic example about political correctness courtesy of Liberals and Dippers, going leaps and bounds beyond the parameters of Common Sense.
F*ck Liberals.
F*ck Dippers.
F*ck Air Canada.
They can try to sell their civilization down the road to Muslim totalitarianism, but I won’t allow it to happen without a fight.
Air Canada should lose it’s operating license for allowing those women on board without comparing their faces with their ID. How many people have to die before Air Canada does it’s job and IDs all passengers?
Threatening to sue, nice AC real nice. Another reason to shun that airline, poor service alone is reason to avoid AC.
Look at where this flight is going and where it’s departing from.Britain has just said that to ban the veil would be un British like,despite what over 60% of it’s population recently polled want,and Montreal allows terrorist organizations to protest openly even accompanied by federal ministers.Air Canada is run like it’s still a crown corporation,bloated management with only the shareholders in mind,screw the passengers and employees.
The average passenger- for the sake of expediency and basic sense of decency and order- follows the rules when traveling on an airplane. Veiled passengers don’t because…..?
Really simple solution- GET RID OF THE HYPHENATED CANADIAN! ONE LAW FOR ALL IN THIS LAND, REGARDLESS OF ETHNICITY, RELIGION AND ALL OF THE OTHER DIVIDING LINES THAT THE FEDS PUT IN. You want to visit? Follow OUR rules! If you want to live here, leave your social baggage behind in your old country and remember- you moved here, YOU adjust to fit in to our society. My parents did this when they emigrated here in the fifties, and I don’t consider myself to have any ties to their country of origin… I am Canadian and nothing else!
Simple… outlaw the “hag in the bag” costume when it comes to security in civilized nations – the third-world islamist barbaristans can do as they like. If the muslima doesn’t want to show her face for ID control, the muslima gets to take the next camel to Cairo instead of flying 21st Century Airlines. No accommodation for backwards bullshite cults – period.
I don’t see what the fuss is about. Travelling internally to the country is a right. Travelling on an airplane is not a right, but has conditions attached to it. Driving is similar. Just because a woman wearing a niqab passed the drivers practical exam and got a licence doesn’t mean that this particular woman did so. Give them a choice: DNA markers on their passports/drivers licences and agreeing to take a blood sample when asked for proof of identity, removal of enough of the outfit to allow for positive ID (and pictures taken at the same level of skin exposure), or no driving/flying. If they insist on their right to travel fully covered and anonymous, offer to sell them a bicycle.
Outside of public safety concerns like those above, my libertarian leanings originally said to leave them alone, but they were then beaten to a pulp by my repugnance for slavery in its many forms and my desire for equality of opportunity (never to be confused with equality of outcome). If there were ever a vote in Canada I’d say to ban the burka also.
“Flynn’s communication with Air Canada and his video posting have resulted in a threatened lawsuit from the airline”
Thus proving the Air Canada motto,
“we’re not happy until your not happy”
is still the modus operendi for our beloved people’s airline
This is bizarre when one considers:
……that tinting on windows (windshield and drivers side-windows) must allow recognition from a distance of 30 feet in normal daylight(4 lux).
……wearing a disguise is a criminal code offense.
No shirt, no shoes, no face, no service.
For the record: wearing a disguise is not a criminal code offence. Wearing a disguise with intent is a criminal code offence, per §351(2): “Every one who, with intent to commit an indictable offence, has his face masked or coloured or is otherwise disguised is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years” (emphasis mine).
thisis just the muzzies way of subjugating the host to proove to the world that tey are indeed taking over not with guns and war ..more of a subtle war with ideology,and political correctness they are tring to force there will upon the western nations . i say we round em all up even the good ones and punt em all out of here and start the process all over again . And d a much better job of screening them like at least four generations of history MUST be provided and no criminal or terrorist links found what so ever.
Also a clear understanding and command of the english language and a willingness to work and an enthusiasm about being in a free democratic society. Nothing but a complete assimilation to our way of living here in canada will be accepted that is the kind of immigrant i can deal with in my country .
As well we must also provide our citizens the ability to provide for a family with only one income period. Not be poor on one income but able to survive and live quit well on a single income so that the white,black ,what ever can have kids and can have them others stay home if they so choose. will be back
sorry gotta go
Paul in calgary
Vίtruvius, try walking into a bank with a mask on.Then try explaining to the tactical squad (after they knock you to the ground, hand cuff you and place you under arrest..) that you had no intent to rob the bank, but merely enjoyed standing around in financial institutions in disguise to while away your time.
I guarantee you will be charged, convicted and do jail time.
Not like I needed another reason, but just add this one to the list of why I don’t fly Air Canada. The sheer Stupidity (capitalization intentional) of the AC staff who allowed this to occur is beyond the pale. I’d say they should be fired, but I have no doubt they were simply following PC protocols as established by the Stupid management of AC.
Then, AC has the gall to respond not with a press release outlining revised security procedures, but with a lawsuit against the whistle blower. Talk about whistling past the graveyard. Were I the videotaping passenger, I would have likely not boarded the plane and demanded AC put me up in a hotel for the night to await the next flight. Bless him for having the foresight to tape the incident which no doubt unfolded quickly.
This is yet another pathetic example about political correctness courtesy of Liberals and Dippers, going leaps and bounds beyond the parameters of Common Sense.
F*ck Liberals.
F*ck Dippers.
F*ck Air Canada.
They can try to sell their civilization down the road to Muslim totalitarianism, but I won’t allow it to happen without a fight.
Air Canada should lose it’s operating license for allowing those women on board without comparing their faces with their ID. How many people have to die before Air Canada does it’s job and IDs all passengers?
Threatening to sue, nice AC real nice. Another reason to shun that airline, poor service alone is reason to avoid AC.
Look at where this flight is going and where it’s departing from.Britain has just said that to ban the veil would be un British like,despite what over 60% of it’s population recently polled want,and Montreal allows terrorist organizations to protest openly even accompanied by federal ministers.Air Canada is run like it’s still a crown corporation,bloated management with only the shareholders in mind,screw the passengers and employees.
The average passenger- for the sake of expediency and basic sense of decency and order- follows the rules when traveling on an airplane. Veiled passengers don’t because…..?
Really simple solution- GET RID OF THE HYPHENATED CANADIAN! ONE LAW FOR ALL IN THIS LAND, REGARDLESS OF ETHNICITY, RELIGION AND ALL OF THE OTHER DIVIDING LINES THAT THE FEDS PUT IN. You want to visit? Follow OUR rules! If you want to live here, leave your social baggage behind in your old country and remember- you moved here, YOU adjust to fit in to our society. My parents did this when they emigrated here in the fifties, and I don’t consider myself to have any ties to their country of origin… I am Canadian and nothing else!
Simple… outlaw the “hag in the bag” costume when it comes to security in civilized nations – the third-world islamist barbaristans can do as they like. If the muslima doesn’t want to show her face for ID control, the muslima gets to take the next camel to Cairo instead of flying 21st Century Airlines. No accommodation for backwards bullshite cults – period.
I don’t see what the fuss is about. Travelling internally to the country is a right. Travelling on an airplane is not a right, but has conditions attached to it. Driving is similar. Just because a woman wearing a niqab passed the drivers practical exam and got a licence doesn’t mean that this particular woman did so. Give them a choice: DNA markers on their passports/drivers licences and agreeing to take a blood sample when asked for proof of identity, removal of enough of the outfit to allow for positive ID (and pictures taken at the same level of skin exposure), or no driving/flying. If they insist on their right to travel fully covered and anonymous, offer to sell them a bicycle.
Outside of public safety concerns like those above, my libertarian leanings originally said to leave them alone, but they were then beaten to a pulp by my repugnance for slavery in its many forms and my desire for equality of opportunity (never to be confused with equality of outcome). If there were ever a vote in Canada I’d say to ban the burka also.