73 Replies to “Where Feminists Fear To Tread”

  1. Looks like I smoked out a few closet feminists here.
    It’s no secret that SDA is a pro-feminist pro-illegal immigration, pro-open immigration, pro-affirmative action website, and the majority of the commenters here are left-liberal war junkies. This has been proven time and time again in threads.
    The readers of SDA support radical feminism and affirmative action and open immigration in each and every thread it has been discussed.
    Small Dead Animals is a left wing website with a left wing agenda. Angry feminists attack, attack, attack heterosexual men who post heterosexual comments.
    Nobody hates you for being wrong. They hate you for being right. Let the record show that I dominated yet another feminist thread at SDA with superior data and made the monkeys very, very angry.

  2. The post – as other posts dedicated to this subject – is meant to illicit a heated response but not as much as it could because I don’t see any supporters of Islam commenting.
    I think the meaning of ‘feminist’ has changed or at least I hope it has because I consider myself one. My meaning of feminism is the kind that believes women do wrong and are responsible for their actions and must take responsibility for them. I believe that women are born with feminine traits but some are encouraged by nurture. I’m not a one way or another believer like many classic feminists.
    Traditional feminists tend to excuse women for their mistakes because they believe women are naturally oppressed victims and suffer from a lack of confidence, which appears to me, to undermine women’s confidence in themselves. Classic feminists are constantly excusing women for bad behavior but will, in a contradictory fashion, assault, harangue by manipulating means, other women for asserting themselves of their legal rights while ignoring men who use violent methods of communication to get their points across. I’ve seen this in the work environment time and time again and is most common in areas where there are union strongholds, like Windsor.
    That being said, I’ve been fired for standing up for myself for being harassed by men at work. If the evidence is there, many of those claims are valid and the employer should usually put a stop to it. Many sexually harassing experiences I’ve encountered I didn’t bother with and many women choose this route. Over time it gets tiring and some of us who aren’t unionized try our hand at standing up for our rights – most times it doesn’t work.
    The last ‘experience’ I had was at the University of Windsor when a student of Engineering (and an old boyfriend) started harassing me at work – classic phone calling, showing up unexpectedly and repeatedly, attempting to forcing me to give him my phone number, not letting me pass by him to get back to work – even though I asked him to stop it – repeatedly. I complained and I got fired. Not by a male but the female administrative officer at the department of Engineering at the University.
    Yet, this guy is known to the RCMP for fundraising for the Hezbollah (it was legal in Canada prior to 2003) and having been jailed for driving under suspension for a dangerous driving charge after colliding with an SUV full of RCMP officers. I never believed him to be dangerous but it shows difficulties with making decisions and the way the University handled it gives an example of the inequities that still exist.
    I find that there is nothing different from right leaning conservative non-Muslim men who rage against feminists to many men who are practicing Islam. I’ve heard it all, been there and done that – see the post about veiled voting on my blog.

  3. Someone throw a coconut at Andrew–and next time he tries to rile the clan, ignore him. Better yet, distract him with a banana: Infants love bananas.

  4. Well, Marlene, you’ve come up against the classic feminist in Canada. She’s the one who’s risen to an administrative position in a large bureacracy, with all of the perks and privileges of the position, and who, from this position of financial security for her and her family, doesn’t want to dirty her hands with something as controversial and messy as a harrassment claim.
    They’re all talk…equality…yada, yada,yada…safety in the workplace, yada, yada, yada, and no walk. In my professional life, I’ve found the women in positions of so-called authority are the worst administrators, too often arbitrary in their judgments, always talking the justice and equality talk but very seldom coming through with the goods.
    They’re more often than not smug, 70’s produced feminists, who feel that just because they’re females, they’re better than men and certainly far superior to any woman who prefers domestic pursuits, like marriage, having children and deciding to take responsibility for their child(ren)’s care, nurture, and education.
    Sorry to hear about your experience, which seems legion these days. Female supremacy, which is what Canadian feminism has morphed into, from the days when women activists loved their kids and husbands but, rightly, felt that woman should be regarded as human beings with political rights, has hijacked a legitimate women’s movement–making many of us very uncomfortable with the label of “feminist.”
    We’ve come a long way, baby, but where have we ended up? Not necessarily in a better place for women–or for anyone else.

  5. “That being said, I’ve been fired for standing up for myself for being harassed by men at work.”
    Sure you have, internet hero. That’s believable in the year 2007, LIAR.
    “The last ‘experience’ I had was at the University of Windsor when a student of Engineering (and an old boyfriend) started harassing me at work…blahblahblah…I complained and I got fired.”
    Right, because Canadian universities are clearly hotbeds of male chauvinism in the year 2007. That’s believable.
    Send me $1000 for having to listen to your pathetic lies.

  6. Actually Andrew I’m not a liar. The University of Windsor is in a class of it’s own – I didn’t say Canadian Universities are hotbeds of male chauvinism – you did.
    You’ve obviously haven’t the experience of complaining against a woman for sexual harassment or harassment in general otherwise you wouldn’t be trying so hard to fabricate a point. If you were in location you should check out the fact that this same administrator has a number of grievances with the University’s union for harassment towards her female employees.

  7. Actually Andrew, I’m not a liar. I didn’t say Universities were hotbeds of male chauvinism – you did. So I guess that makes you the liar.
    Fabricating an argument where none exists is just a way to deflect from the real issue and that’s the existence of sexual harassment and harassment in the work force – I said Windsor was a great place for this because the union setting is paternalistic.
    Besides, there are a number of grievances with the University’s union – the C.A.W (who else?)against this female administrator for harassment. Who made the claims? Women.
    I don’t go out of my way to say things I can’t back up and if I make a mistake – it might be tough on the ego, but I like to take responsibility for it.

  8. Actually Andrew, I’m not a liar. I didn’t say Universities were hotbeds of male chauvinism – you did. So I guess that makes you the liar.
    Fabricating an argument where none exists is just a way to deflect from the real issue and that’s the existence of sexual harassment and harassment in the work force – I said Windsor was a great place for this because the union setting is paternalistic.
    Besides, there are a number of grievances with the University’s union – the C.A.W (who else?)against this female administrator for harassment. Who made the claims? Women.
    I don’t go out of my way to say things I can’t back up and if I make a mistake – it might be tough on the ego, but I like to take responsibility for it.

  10. Marlene, that’s a great internet story, but I have a few questions:
    Can you make things up and no one will really check or dare call you on it?
    Can you pretend like you don’t even know what anyone is talking about on this topic?
    Has whining about and hating the other gender actually been made into a course of studies in college (women’s studies) – as opposed to the true, neutral, unbiased study of this topic – which is simply anthropology?
    Can you propagate myths and outright lies and be given a “pass” – without more rigor being demanded?
    Do you want to be treated like a child when it suits you but as an adult when you get an advantage from that?
    Can you rationalize your own failures using the concept of the “patriarchy”, and blame the other gender for nearly everything that goes wrong in your life – even with quite contorted explanations that no one would otherwise buy – while failures of the other gender are just … failures?
    Can almost any remark by a man be construed as verbal abuse if you want sympathy, but the meanest, nastiest, most humiliating things that you can say simply involve “speaking your mind” and “some people just don’t want to hear the truth”?
    Can you manipulate using old notions of men protecting and deferring to women when it comes in handy?
    Can you effectively manipulate by playing the victim?
    Do tears work sometimes?
    Your prompt response appreciated,
    Andrew

  11. Re:Marlene’s experience with her ‘Hezbollah-inclined’ former paramour. Gee, would it be racist for me to point out how many times I’ve heard of this before?
    Ladies, those dusky lads may be charming at first…just keep in mind there’s a price to be paid!

  13. Longtime lurker here.
    Just felt the overwhelming need to point out that Andrew is obviously an extreme feminist trying to play like an aggrieved ant-feminist male to distract from the fact feminists are giving islam a pass, much like they gave Bill Clinton.
    She is doing her best to get you to hate her, so that through her play acting you, too, will learn that men are all jackbooted thugs.
    Sad, really.
    No real man, confident in his sexuality and of a modern bent, can excuse the oppression of women under islam. Only women who think that not being allowed in a golf club exclusive to rich males is ‘real oppresion’ and what women go through under islam is ‘cultural difference’.

  14. Yes, we’re quite used to seeing a series of “brand new posters” show up in threads such as this.
    It generally ends up with me arguing with 7 or 8 “brand new posters”, all of whom have heart wrenching stories and none of whom ever show up in subsequent threads. From a mathematical point of view it is farcical to take any of these “brand new posters” seriously. Try again.

  15. Andrew, I’ve been reading this thread and I still don’t see what your malfunction is here. Are you saying Muslim women are NOT oppressed, or that all women SHOULD BE oppressed like the Muslim broads are, or WTF is your damage?
    Because it looks to me like you’re just gassing off to see yourself in print. Learn to talk, eh?

  16. At the end of the day, Phantom, I’m arguing with feminists, and you’re arguing with a conservative, again. When given the choice of attacking feminists telling statistically implausible lies or attacking a conservative, you chose to attack a conservative. Because that’s what you do, attack conservatives.

  17. Actually you’re not “arguing” with anyone dude. You’re spewing like a Lefty. Lots of sound and fury but not much significant content, know what I mean?
    So, back to the subject at hand:
    A)Muslim women are not oppressed.
    B)Muslim women are oppressed but who cares?
    C)No women anywhere are ever oppressed but should be ’cause they are a bunch of lying sluts and I hate them!!!!
    D)All women everywhere should be oppressed like the Muslim ones are because I hate them!!!
    E)All of the above, with bells on.
    Chose one or make up a sentence that actually says what you mean. There’s a good boy.

  18. I’ve posted significant data in this thread, you’re just blurting insults and wanking with your opinions. Keep trying, closet Liberal feminist who attacks conservatives.

  19. i have to agree with andrew. its pretty obvious this is a left wing blog overrun by left wing trolls and sockpuppets who attack anyone who opposes feminism or affirmative action or open immigration.
    andrew makes good points about how anoymous trolls magically and conveniently appear in these threads and people like phantom who repeatedly harrasses him are obviously closet liberals. lol i especially like the angry feminist lady who thinks she is strong enough to rip a man’s head off and p*ss down his neck. what a silly little feminist!

  21. You’ve all heard this before,
    “Men want sex,
    women want money”
    Well take a look at at what battle feminists have chosen to fight, and most of them are about money,
    money for free contraceptives, money for free abortions, money for day care, money from divorce, money from law suits, money for feminist programs at universities, money for feminists studies and so on and so forth…
    There is no money – or very little – in fighting for Islamic women so feminists are not interested.
    Ok feminists are also about gaining more power to better tyranize men, but they are mostly about money.
    oh, one last thing,
    I am a man and I definitely want sex.

  22. I don’t necessarily disagree with you Andrew, I don’t understand your point. Sure you’ve posted a lot of “data” in this thread, I’m just not sure any of it is true.
    Kate’s post says the Feminazis remain 100% silent on the very real oppression many Muslim women face in this country. Instead, Feminazis bend all their efforts to making the easy-target White Males like myself miserable.
    So, Kate thinks the Femmies are full of poo poo. I agree with that. A lot.
    Therefore I am a closet liberal?
    So you can see the reason for my confusion. That’s the kind of thinking I expect to see posted by ok4ua. Are you sure you’re not him in drag?

  23. It’s understandable that you are confused, Phantom, given what you have to work with. I have a few questions for you:
    Do you sometimes pretend like you don’t even know what anyone is talking when your support of feminism is questioned?
    Do you sometimes attack anti-feminist men to score points with feminists, knowing full well that your actions actually harm the welfare of men?
    Do you spend more time arguing with feminists than antifeminists, and wonder why people think you are a closet liberal?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation