David Suzuki’s Poll results

Baiting The Left 158 Comments

suzukipoll.GIF
Looks good so far.
Update: Latest results as of 8:30 Eastern Time.
VanishedDate: For some reason there is now a blank spot on the web site where the poll used to be.

158 Replies to “David Suzuki’s Poll results”

  2. A great day for the environment!
    You can only vote once. I tried to vote twice and checked the total vote count. It didn’t change.
    Greetings to WC – fellow refugee from Tim Blair

  3. You’ve already voted on this poll
    Can Canada meet its Kyoto target?
    Yes, and we can do it through domestic reductions. 1869 (16.03%)
    Yes, but we’ll have to buy some international credits to do it. 367 (3.15%)
    No, but we should still try. 763 (6.54%)
    No, so we shouldn’t bother trying. 8662 (74.28%)
    Total Replies : 11661

  6. “You can vote as often as you like. Just delete the cookie from http://www.davisuzuki.org…….etc.”
    Kooky Suzuki will see this as evidence of the Vast Rightwing Conspiracy against him.
    Only one question needs to be put to him.
    “David, is there any evidence that could be put forward to you that would change your belief about GW?”
    A negative response from the Cardinal would confirm that his belief is based on faith not science.

  8. The Rime of the Ancient Mariner give us an insight into good ole albatros39a’s psyche: He’s forced to carry around the carcasses of PMPM, PMJC, and soon to be LOTOSD (Leader of the Opposition Stephy Dion) around his neck.

  9. I only vote once. Why be as crooked as the left to bludgeon our point of view into the mix dishonestly? I don’t think we have too, nor is it in my opinion desirable. Last time I looked it was a 72 % against the anti-human civilization destroying mongers.
    Even if it was the opposite I would still be straightforward. Lets not dislike the Libs tactics, only to take them up ourselves. Instead get your buddies to vote. That’s the democratic honest way.
    As for David Suzuki I think like Svend, his time has come. Both have buggered the system for years. The open sore of raging hypocrisy is building up to a height enough to topple this gad fly’s castle of imaginary dreams of universal devotion for the world as a goddess or nature worship. Mixed with his socialist money transfer scam ,with unlimited wealth for poor David via his good buddy Moe. Lately it just is not going right for Mr. Suzuki. Perhaps this is why he ran off at the mouth in a grade six class & tuned it into politics pure & simple. The Kyoto scam gets exposed more daily than ever for the ponzi plot it is by the UN, & the enemies of Individual freedom by the collectivists & totalitarians of the planet.
    Davids dream of Utopia with money for nothing & chicks for free has come home to roost. The eggs of his envio-shell game are sterile. His dogma suspect on every level by personnel inconsistencies as well as the abounding proof his dog & pony show is out of carrots or creditability. It offers only death, deconstruction & eventually the death of choice or freedom , with science in decline if not looked at with derision because of this sociological political buffoonery. I just wonder how many dead or other people will be lost or killed because of this moon calf mentality? The only thing these socialists have ever been good at is a high body count., in every area of the globe. Death is their signature end ,as the cry’s of tolerance is their in, & beginning.
    Frankly I would love to lay a carbon footprint up their backside but hey, you can’t have it all. (O:}
    Just my opinion

  11. Another example of Suzuki’s hypocrisy is the fact that he warns about overpopulation, but he has five children. The media only seem to ever mention the two by his current wife, but ignore the three by his first wife.

  12. Very good points, Revnant Dream. I’ve just voted, and just the once. The latest numbers are: 1873 (15.58%), 368 (3.06%), 764 (6.36%, and 9016 (75.00%) for a total of 12,021 votes cast.
    By the way, I did a bit of wandering around DS’s site. He’s descsribed as a geneticist, with studies in zoology and biology, and an academic career in zoology, genetics, biology, bacteriology & immunology, and sustainable research development. At no place did I see any mention that he had studied in climatology, meteorology, or atmospherics. The closest, I suppose, would be sustainable r&d. Therefore, when he speaks about Kyoto, he is speaking totally out of his area of scientific expertise. So I ask our friendly neighbourhood Kyotologists – why shoud his opinions matter any more than those of anyone else?

  14. Revnant; what a great rant. Thanks for that.
    Algore seems to have been caught out in the other part of the scam:
    “Former Vice President Al Gore has built a Green money-making machine capable of eventually generating billions of dollars for investors, including himself, but he set it up so that the average Joe can’t afford to play on Gore’s terms. And the US portion is headed up by a former Gore staffer and fund raiser who previously ran afoul of both the FEC and the DOJ, before Janet Reno jumped in and shut down an investigation during the Clinton years.
    Gore helped found Generation Investment Management, through which he and others pay for offsets. The firm invests the money in solar, wind and other projects that reduce energy consumption around the globe…
    Gore is chairman of the firm and, presumably, draws an income or will make money as its investments prosper. In other words, he “buys” his “carbon offsets” from himself, through a transaction designed to boost his own investments and return a profit to himself. To be blunt, Gore doesn’t buy “carbon offsets” through Generation Investment Management – he buys stocks.”
    Read more at Newsbusters.org
    http://newsbusters.org/node/11149

  15. Is there any info out there where suzuki stood re the DDT ban, which resulted in the deaths of millions of Africans. Was that ban a knowing attempt to depopulate the earth. Gore supported it as he wrote the introduction to Rachel Carsons book, the silent spring. With all this going on I might start believing all the stories about how AIDS was deliberatly introduced to Africa.

  16. jimbola:
    Informative post! Thanks.
    Seems like these coconuts are finally falling threw their own machinations. Sweet as sweet can be to me. Shows their duplicity at gratifying levels. Enough I hope to anger more moral people.
    Good research. Never fails not to pay off in dividends. Doing like Dorothy & following the yellow brick road. Than shaking out the money tree while watching where the leaves fall.
    Following the money trail, never disappoints one for answers to hard questions.

  20. The poll may be gone, but at least we still have the results (Yes – 1885 & 370; No – 770 & 9386). And, in case the good Doctor’s foundation accidentally gets rid of it, I’ve not only screen saved that page (in jpeg format), but I’ve saved the actual web page itself.

  23. Just another meaningless left-wing poll. Ho-hum. Problem is they will never end. I think that we should have a regular poll. We should ask questions that directly confront the intelligence of guys like Suzuki. Here is a sample question:
    “Given that Dr. David Suzuki is a “geneticist” and has no credentials in climatology, do you believe that he has any credibility whatsoever?
    Choices:
    Great credibility
    Some credibility
    A little credibility
    Hardly any credibility
    Precious little credibility
    A minute amount of credibility
    A mere shred of credibility
    A trace amount of credibility
    An imaginable amount of credibility
    Not really any credibility
    No credibility at all
    Absolutely no credibility at all
    My cat has more credibility than Dr. S
    My sperm has more credibility than Dr. S
    Thank you for participating in this poll!!!

  24. Where in the world did Dr.Kawasaki find 1885 kindergarten kids to get them to vote “yes” on his disastrous poll? I though his smog tour only stopped at a few elementary schools.

  26. ROFL different Bob; love it!
    I filled in the letter part on the main web page but I changed it a bit…I erased the crapy grade school…
    ‘if I were PM” heading, geeesh!
    I addresssed the PM only.
    Dear Mr. Harper: Please stop these fools as fast as you can! We voted for you last time and will this time too. We need a majority and fast before the king of fruit flies has us all living in the dirt and frost like third world slaves.
    Sincerely…

  28. Can Canada meet its Kyoto target?
    Yes, and we can do it through domestic reductions. 1885 (12.42%)
    Yes, but we’ll have to buy some international credits to do it. 370 (2.44%)
    No, but we should still try. 770 (5.07%)
    No, so we shouldn’t bother trying. 12151 (80.07%)

  29. albatros, are you still claiming moral equivalence between fixing an on-line poll (yes, I assume as you do, that somebody voted the ‘no’ side a lot of times – although I think a significant percentage of the ‘no’ votes are certainly legitimate) and stealing money from the Canadian tax-payer to buy the next several elections? You seem to be the poster-boy for why moral relativism has been a disaster for Western society. For the record, despite the fact that I have no certain proof that the ‘no’ vote was run up unethically, and despite the fact that the ‘no’ side (which I support here) won in a landslide, I put absolutely NO credence in this poll, and will not use it to promote the idea that most Canadians are anti-Kyoto. I have my suspicions, but this non-scientific poll isn’t worth the bandwidth it takes up, except as a brief entertainment item. You can continue gnashing your teeth bitterly at how moronic ‘rednecks’ are, or you can learn that this particular item isn’t significant and come to the table to engage in an actual exchange of ideas. Those questions I asked you earlier weren’t rhetorical, though you ignored anything that you couldn’t defend, without acknowledging their importance. That kind of arrogance is what voters punished in the old Tories (not to say the new Tories couldn’t do it again, but we’ll do the same thing if they do – and no, we won’t make the excuse, “there was no one else to vote for” – we’ll remake a party from scratch if we have to again). I fear for the Liberals (and lefty opposition in general) if you’re all too scared to introspectively and profoundly reform yourselves out of fear of us having a turn at running things.
    There’s a saying that conservatives generally believe liberals to be well-intentioned but misguided (to be charitable); the same saying says that liberals believe conservatives to be simply evil. I’m afraid that your comments in here have done nothing to disprove this. Good luck with the soul-searching, my friend.

  30. Can Canada meet its Kyoto target?
    Yes, and we can do it through domestic reductions. 1885(12.14%)
    Yes, but we’ll have to buy some international credits to do it. 370(2.38%)
    No, but we should still try. 770(4.96%)
    No, so we shouldn’t bother trying. 12500(80.52%)
    Total Replies : 15525

  31. Also for the record – yes, I did try to vote twice (partially to be able to see the vote results, which aren’t independently accessible, except by ‘revoting’), but was denied (as far as I can tell). I didn’t do anything after that attempt to dishonestly revote, though it seems certain that someone else found a way to do so.

  33. He is asking for you to write a letter to the PM but the first person addessed is Dion. Then, there is a stmt, this is what the letter will say. So, how many kyotologists will just send suzukis words. If only those that voted yes respond there will not be many letters. My suggestion is to take the addresses and e-mail your own letter, ignoring suzukis site. At least dion & layton should get about 5000 letters saying, kill kyoto. Send the same letter to you MP. Maybe Kate could post the addresses so we don’t give suzuki the idea his site is becoming popular.

  34. Baa Haa Heee!!! Beaker took his poll down rather than face more abuse. It must be killing him that someone else rigged his own poll instead of his guys. Come on, Super Dave: put up another poll. Don’t let the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy beat you this easily.

  35. Last time I looked ,before the poll vanished , the “NO … don’t bother to try” was at 75%.
    If that poll is even close to reality then come the next election Kyoto is a dead issue with most voters.
    … I guess Suzuki will claim victory as there was an error in the poll calculation like Kyoto.

  36. The pole results page is still there though. Here is the page’s results as of 7:25 MST 4/Mar
    Thanks for taking this poll
    Can Canada meet its Kyoto target?
    Yes, and we can do it through domestic reductions. 1885 (11.75%)
    Yes, but we’ll have to buy some international credits to do it. 370 (2.31%)
    No, but we should still try. 770 (4.80%)
    No, so we shouldn’t bother trying. 13013 (81.14%)
    Total Replies : 16038

  37. You can’t double vote in the poll if you run a windows browser…it grabs your IP address and ID…Kate may have directed traffic to it but the numbers are not disputable.
    If Lefty can’t get his hordes out to counter the poll results , tells me suppoert for Fruit fly science is not there.

  39. I think the poll was rigged but not in the way that you are talking about.
    This was a poll set up on a website where normally the only traffic would come from the FF congregation. It was set up to prove that an overwhelming number of respondents support Dr. FF and his religious crusade. CAN ANYONE DOUBT that the results of this so-called poll would have been used in communications to the public and the politicians about the support for meeting Kyoto targets??
    Voters can’t “rig” a poll, but it is pretty clear to me that Dr. FF rigged this one and was going to use it for his ends.
    Its only because Kate found this and directed traffic that this nefarious scheme was detected and stopped.
    As an aside I was somewhat heartened to see that of the adherents, not many supported buying credits overseas. Mo Strong will have to have a chat with his acolyte about this.

  41. Poll _is_ still there – go to
    http://www.davidsuzuki.org/
    NatureChallenge/
    at_Home/
    toolkit.asp
    Note that the “Yes” vote has gone up.
    Can Canada meet its Kyoto target?
    Yes, and we can do it through domestic reductions. 1907(10.41%)
    Yes, but we’ll have to buy some international credits to do it. 370(2.02%)
    No, but we should still try. 770(4.20%)
    No, so we shouldn’t bother trying. 15275 (83.37%)
    Total Replies : 18322

  43. So now Dr. FF is trying to rig it even more by hiding it deeper in the site.
    He could make it even better if he turns off the counter if you vote no.
    What a maroon.

  45. mhb here’s your answers
    >Suzuki has the morals of a slug, to exploit this child in this fashion. Ditto, albatros, if you’re cool with it also.By the way, albatros, if the science for AGW is indeed so “solid”, then why do you and your ilk rely upon fraudulent data such as the “hockey stick curve” to win converts?Or rely on “consensus” when trying to apply the scientific method, when any opposing scientific thoughts are expunged? Or publicly denigrate and slander leading climatologists who oppose the groupthink and have theories to the contrary? Why do you support meteorologists who publicly proclaim that other meteos should have professional credentials pulled if they don’t publicly swear fealty to global warming? Or otherwise try to squelch any form of opposing thought or debate? Why are you all so terrified of an inquisitive public considering something other than the hysteria of the AGW crowd?Do you ever question why, when the meteorologists can’t get the weather predictions correct for the next two weeks, that we should risk our industries and economies in the blind faith that these same people (who were dead wrong on global cooling, the population explosion, DDT & others) will be spot-on in their predictions spanning the next hundred years?
    Does that not strike you as a bit naive?What about you, personally, alby? How much do you “walk the talk” on global warming? Indeed, do you walk, bike or take the bus, or do you have a car? Is it a hybrid or a smart car? Would you be cool with $5 or $10 for a liter of gas, “in the name of fighting global warming”?http://www.cooldrivepass.com/home.cfm. Would I like to pay higher gas prices? I’d have no problem with a 5 or 10 cent carbon tax. The one thing you have to remember is the more we consume the higher the price will be so it’s consumption that will eventually lead to the $5 per litre of fuel. It doesn’t matter to the energy companies what price you pay per litre as long as you continue to pay. Being more efficient isn’t only good for the environment, it’ll be good for your wallet too.
    >How big is your dwelling? Do you use air conditioning in either your home or vehicle? Only use your computer sparingly to save on those CO2-spawning watts?Do you think – assuming there is even a shred of truth to the theory that man is causing AGW – that bankrupting our economy and sending $billions to China to help them build almost 600 coal-fired generating stations (and sweetening Maurice Strong’s personal fortune in the process) will make the world a better place?“Do you really blindly swallow everything an environmental shill (and well-paid one, at that) such as Suzuki huffs is the truth, especially considering that the science of global warming is not even close to his field of expertise? Do you ask your barber to perform surgery on you, or fix your teeth?”Do you really believe in Al Gore, Saviour of the Environment….Do you have a job, alby? Maybe even in the industrial sector? Ever wondered where you’ll work if your company can’t afford extortionate carbon taxes or “carbon credits” and goes feet-up?No need to answer, alby, because I truly couldn’t care less. But you might want to give it some thought before you keep blindly following eco-maniacs like Suzuki that would ruin our economy and standard of living over a scheme that relies upon junk science, fear and propaganda to make its mark. And to attract its marks.Or maybe it’s just time for you to troll someplace else, eh?

  46. Heh. According to Jack’s Newswatch, people are still voting on the CACHED version of the poll. The No vote is now at 17780, a 85.36% share.
    Apparently the good Dr. wasn’t speaking to a representative sample of the population when he was on his magical mystery tour…

  47. Pukie Suzuki is as crazy as MARICE STRONG that wacko eco-freak from CANANDA i mean they are nuts and STRONG has this goofy temple built to honor the BABALINONAN SUN GOD he and PUKIE SUZUKI and wackos

  48. albatros39a your close its not the opposing and true side of the argument, just the opposing side. The truth has never been said by the likes of gore or suzuki.

  50. Un frickin believable… its a “polltergeist” it’s dead but it still moves.
    Now over 18,000.
    BTW alby, I hope you catch the UK Channel 4 Program of the “Great Global Warming Swindle” coming soon. And I assume you have seen the discussion of lGore’s investments…guess who will make a ton of money off of rubes like you?? Does it piss you off that the Bush ranch is more efficient than the Gore mansion. What about Suzuki’s 5 kids…while he rails about overpopulation.
    Or are your ears covered…La La La La

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation