I soon discovered that trees are just large plants that have evolved the ability to grow long wooden stems. They didn’t do that so we could cut them up into lumber and grind them into pulp; they actually had only one purpose in mind and that was to get their needles or leaves higher up above the other plants where the tree could then monopolize the Sun’s energy for photosynthesis. When foresters create openings or clearcuts when they harvest trees, one of the reasons for doing it is so the new trees growing back can be in full sunlight. Trees are basically plants that want to be in the sun. If trees wanted to be in the shade they would have been shrubs instead, they would not have spent so much time and energy growing long wooden stems.
Forests are home to the majority of living species; not the oceans, nor the grasslands, nor the alpine areas, but ecosystems that are dominated by trees. There is a fairly simple reason for this. The living bodies of the trees themselves create a new environment that would not be there in their absence. Now the canopy above is home to millions of birds and insects where there was once only thin air. And beneath the canopy, in the interior of the forest, the environment is now protected from frost and sun and wind. This, in combination with the food provided by the leaves, fruits and even the wood of the trees, creates thousands of new habitats into which new species can evolve, species that could never have existed if it were not for the presence of the living trees.
This gives rise to the obvious concern that if the trees are cut down the habitats or homes will be lost and the species that live in them will die. Indeed, in 1996 the World Wildlife Fund, at a media conference in Geneva, announced that 50,000 species are going extinct each year due to human activity. And the main cause of these 50,000 extinctions, they said, is commercial logging. The story was carried around the world by Associated Press and other media and hundreds of millions of people came to believe that forestry is the main cause of species extinction.
During the past three years I have asked the World Wildlife Fund on many occasions to please provide me with a list of some of the species that have supposedly become extinct due to logging. They have not offered up a single example as evidence. In fact, to the best of our scientific knowledge, no species has become extinct in North America due to forestry.
Where are these 50,000 species that are said to be going extinct each year? They are in a computer model in Edward O. Wilson’s laboratory at Harvard University. They are electrons on a hard drive, they have no Latin names, and they are in no way related to any direct field observations in any forest.
Moore was a founding member of Greenpeace.
h/t Sheldon Kotyk.

BHoax: Love your spelling of environMENTAList. I might start using it.
skip the evolutionist: please dont avoid answering the question. it is not rhetorical or coy, I seriously want to know and for the benefit of the entire audience, how is it you propose to explain how atomic particles which are the constituent building blocks of all nature, living AND inanimate, how do they ‘know’ what to do where and when to become living replicating self-aware individuals ??? huge branches of species and sub-species that have existed for millions and sometimes 100s of millions of years according to evolutionists.
little itty bitty protons and electrons which also join up to give us neutrons and thus isotopes.
how do they do it ???
anyone feel free to leap into the fray on either side.
I have never gotten anything but sarcasm in response to this question. wtf are evolutionists afraid of ????
gee, mebbee you didnt think of this angle and arent prepared for it eh ?
gawd I love turning sacred cows into hamburger.
the good news is I have decided to postpone renovating my kitchen and instead am just painting over the bilous green coloured walls on a temporary basis. something akin to the 2-tone victorian age turn of the century what do they call it motif.
Co-founder of Greenpeace examines Kyoyo.
http://greenspirit.com/key_issues.cfm?msid=34
Really, really makes sense of it.
Over 90% of ALL species that ever existed are now extinct. The “flunked out of life and got expelled”, as my old man would say.
Damn good thing, too. Who wants to have to put on a lotion to keep the T. Rex’s away?
Why doesn’t Skip answer the question Robert?
Well, it’s the classic, “We don’t have an answer so we’ll ignore it so we don’t have to deal with it.”
Ask Stephen KyotoMan Dion how Kyoto will actually help the environment and he won’t have an answer either.