13 Replies to “The Sound Of Settled Science”

  2. l post “in the tradition of lobotomies . . . . . ”
    l get “This request looks like it might be automated. To protect our users from spam and other malicious activity, we can’t complete this action right now. Please try again later.” uuuh ???ftw

    1. “This request looks like it might be automated.”

      Because only a poorly coded application has such miseducated writing skills, it should explain.

      1. ah. so youre say AI took over that forum as well?
        maybe they should slice up, scan and destroy lots more books to perfect their reading comprehension. lm curious how the ‘guts’ of AI is structured.

  4. I follow Sam Hoole on X/Twitter and think he gets it “much of the time” … I guess it simply shows that both sides need to be able to show their work, and to not follow anyone blindly.

  5. Children understand the long term effects of puberty blockers the way they understand the long term effects of smoking. That’s why all of these silly bans on smoking, drinking, etc. should be removed.

    1. Children understand the long-term effects of nothing because, to date, their lives have been short term.
      Hence the term “children” rather than “people”. Children aren’t human beings, they’re human becomings.

  6. It stands to reason that the bigest fans of puberty blockers are pedophiles.
    Let’s re-examine the motive, and the motivators, in every case. Bet there’s a Chock Full O’ Kid Diddlers right there.

  7. I’m going out on a limb here … by suggesting that 97% of Doctors believe Climate Change poses a threat to their patients health. And their patients should all stop driving and take mass transit.

  8. It’s always money. The medical industry (and make no mistake, it is/has become an industry) sees this as a pertual treatment cash cow. Politics and personal beliefs are a secondary consideration, but are used as a rationalization. And, this mentality is not confined to the “transgender” aspect of medicine.

    Ask yourself a simple question: “What are the ramifications of finding an all out cure for a particular medical disease/ illness?”

    Simple, it takes down an entire facet of the medical industry. It negates the value of those “medical maintenance” drugs, employees, and treatments in place today. There are people who have established stable life long careers studying a specific medical condition of disease. Medical research is largely done on a Federal Grant basis. The primary recipients of those public funds target basic and early-stage research at universities, non-profit hospitals, and research institutions. THEN….drug companies independently fund later-stage clinical development and commercialization. The KEYWORD is “commercialization.” And, commercialization is not compatable with an all out cure. In fact, cure is a detriment in overall revenue and commercialization. Drug companies don’t want a cure. They want medical maintenance with a guaranteed perpetual revenue stream.

    Oh, and the MAID program. It’s, also, about money directly and indirectly. Directly, Canada leads the planet in organ donation from euthanasia recipients. It won’t be long until they are surpassed by the UK who did two things. 1. Made organ donation entirely Opt out instead of signing up without any debate in Parliament. and 2. They just started their own Euthanasia program right on schedule. It’s restricted now, but just watch how it expands shortly. The indirect financial benefit of MAID is more of an estate tax issue. The government gets their asset cut before anything goes to the beneficiaries. It’s a constant taxation money flow that was always there, but now it is sped up.

    1. “It’s always money.”

      Yes. You’ve explained the carrot nicely, now it’s time to bring out the STICK to beat them with.
      Let’s keep that medical donkey on the narrow path we want it to serve us on.
      They’ve regulated us, now it’s time to regulate them. Good and hard.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation