The woman on the left will tell you that she is university educated and smarter than you. She is permitted to vote.
25 Replies to “The Programming of an NPC Unravels in Real Time”
How does she self identify (not that I care)?
Identifies as an afro-latina queer woman. The most appropriate label is “just another assh*le”
Beautiful!!
As an idiot.
These kids are not that smart. They can barely remember the propaganda they’re supposed to regurgitate on demand.
This collegiate GENIUS used the word … “prevalent” when she meant to say “relevant”.
I am always amused when these children try out the BIG vocabulary words they just heard their professor use … but only make themselves sound … dumb. Best to stick with her weird amalgam of Valleygurl sub-urban Ebonics.
Q: Any black person alive today that has been a slave?
A: Yes.
Q: Under American law?
A: Yes.
(then proceeds to clap her hands and jump up and down…)
Wow.
And just imagine where she’s learned all this utter nonsense? Public schools? College? TikTok?
Yes, there’s so much propaganda sloshing around in their heads that it always comes out in a jumble.
Had a conversation with a rather well of guy.
From the conversation it was obvious that he had an ideology. You could not make any sense of what he said.
Keep talking about greed of the capitalist, I said that I prefer free enterprise.
Pointing to this clip: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=Freedman%20on%20donahue&mid=9F7B85E08F06DEA9A6299F7B85E08F06DEA9A629&ajaxhist=0
I of course had to narrate it, since there was no video, the guy went about how there are grades of greed, little greed for everybody, more greed for the better off, maximum greed of the billionaires.
When asking about if he cares that two years from now a corporation goes bankrupt while 2 years previously making a healthy profit, if he cares, ha, he had no answer.
Just to make clear, don’t much care about wealthy people, the point is, it is none of my care how much money the other guy has as long as he made straight, not by crime.
Thanks for sharing this one, Robert. It was hilarious!
Her mouth may be doing 100 mph, but her brain is only doing 30. She visibly panicked when she realized not only what she had said (*to the camera*) but also that she was totally incapable of putting together a coherent response to extricate herself from the situation.
Walking away was the about smartest thing she did…coming back, not so much. 🙂
This turdbrain walked away after one salient question:
This is no different than the women supporting Lindsay Clancy.
I have had to correct so many women in Saskatchewan, whom I had previously believed were intelligent human beings. I never thought I would have to explain to grown adults my own age that mental illness, or postpartum is not an excuse for murder. Also, the blatant exaggeration and lies many women told me about the husband in order to pass blame to him, when they thought I hadn’t read or educated myself on the case
Watch their heads explode when you ask if they are suggesting mental illness is a defence. Therefore, the likes of Paul Bernardo, Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacey, et. al. should not have been incarcerated or executed for their crimes. Even the failure to have a conscience is a mental illness.
I brought males who murdered their own children and tried to claim some form of mental incompetence
Again confusing education with intelligence. She is educated but still stupider than a two-peckered owl.
I’m glad. None of the women I know are like that.
Luv her muffin top…
They are emotionally and literally children.
I’m 70. I remember back when we had to exhibit above-average intelligence and knowledge in order to be admitted to college.
This woman wouldn’t have been admitted. Pretty sure now she’ll graduate with an important major like Black Intersectional Autism or something.
I have been diagnosed with Youth Intersectional Autism. I am officially “Y. I. Auta”…
Isn’t remarkable that you can form a rather accurate opinion of someone intellectually and emotionally by just evaluating the way they choose appear in public?
Wearing a half-shirt while sporting such flabby mid-section implies inflated self-worth. The other option would have been “not caring”. However, the instant the individual strolls up to participate in an on camera discussion, the second option is moot. Then there is the twirling around (quite literally) when in disagreement. That is a sign of pent up frustration and immaturity. Grabbing the microphone despite it being held by another party suggests “my opinion is important than yours, so listen up.” Then, the voice goes up an octave suggesting an inability to show self-discipline, and emotions take over.
The default response shows up almost immediately when the host points out the factual percentages on gun violence. There was no consideration. There was no counter point. There was reflex. And, that required an ad hominem attack totally disassociated to the topic. “You’re evil. Oh, you’re evil.”
Then something very obvious occurs. When the woman was reciting the “narrative” and the “message” her voice was emotional and an octave higher. She felt she knew it better than the host and was going to school her. But, when she got trapped into a yes or no question about whether Charlie Kirk deserved to die, she has no prepared narrative for that, and her voice takes a quick dive back to normal level. She’s a walking emotion farm. The rest is just a woman trying to recover and obfuscate.
The truth is, people like this are fun to “play with.” You can wind them up one moment, and pull out their batteries the next. But, what really sets them off and causes the screaming, hitting and spitting is just to laugh at them.
Short version: The biggest disadvantage of a Progressive is that they are entirely predictable.
the short version, the university student just way too ready to ‘spout’ ie reflex regurgitate without
the very *core* reason for being at a university . . . . . to THINK.
So true. I’m old enough to remember that the original purpose of a “Liberal Arts” degree was “to learn how to learn.”
How does she self identify (not that I care)?
Identifies as an afro-latina queer woman. The most appropriate label is “just another assh*le”
Beautiful!!
As an idiot.
These kids are not that smart. They can barely remember the propaganda they’re supposed to regurgitate on demand.
This collegiate GENIUS used the word … “prevalent” when she meant to say “relevant”.
I am always amused when these children try out the BIG vocabulary words they just heard their professor use … but only make themselves sound … dumb. Best to stick with her weird amalgam of Valleygurl sub-urban Ebonics.
Q: Any black person alive today that has been a slave?
A: Yes.
Q: Under American law?
A: Yes.
(then proceeds to clap her hands and jump up and down…)
Wow.
And just imagine where she’s learned all this utter nonsense? Public schools? College? TikTok?
Yes, there’s so much propaganda sloshing around in their heads that it always comes out in a jumble.
Had a conversation with a rather well of guy.
From the conversation it was obvious that he had an ideology. You could not make any sense of what he said.
Keep talking about greed of the capitalist, I said that I prefer free enterprise.
Pointing to this clip: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=Freedman%20on%20donahue&mid=9F7B85E08F06DEA9A6299F7B85E08F06DEA9A629&ajaxhist=0
I of course had to narrate it, since there was no video, the guy went about how there are grades of greed, little greed for everybody, more greed for the better off, maximum greed of the billionaires.
When asking about if he cares that two years from now a corporation goes bankrupt while 2 years previously making a healthy profit, if he cares, ha, he had no answer.
Just to make clear, don’t much care about wealthy people, the point is, it is none of my care how much money the other guy has as long as he made straight, not by crime.
Thanks for sharing this one, Robert. It was hilarious!
Her mouth may be doing 100 mph, but her brain is only doing 30. She visibly panicked when she realized not only what she had said (*to the camera*) but also that she was totally incapable of putting together a coherent response to extricate herself from the situation.
Walking away was the about smartest thing she did…coming back, not so much. 🙂
This turdbrain walked away after one salient question:
https://x.com/saras76/status/2102261190026039537
This is no different than the women supporting Lindsay Clancy.
I have had to correct so many women in Saskatchewan, whom I had previously believed were intelligent human beings. I never thought I would have to explain to grown adults my own age that mental illness, or postpartum is not an excuse for murder. Also, the blatant exaggeration and lies many women told me about the husband in order to pass blame to him, when they thought I hadn’t read or educated myself on the case
Watch their heads explode when you ask if they are suggesting mental illness is a defence. Therefore, the likes of Paul Bernardo, Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacey, et. al. should not have been incarcerated or executed for their crimes. Even the failure to have a conscience is a mental illness.
I brought males who murdered their own children and tried to claim some form of mental incompetence
Again confusing education with intelligence. She is educated but still stupider than a two-peckered owl.
I’m glad. None of the women I know are like that.
Luv her muffin top…
They are emotionally and literally children.
I’m 70. I remember back when we had to exhibit above-average intelligence and knowledge in order to be admitted to college.
This woman wouldn’t have been admitted. Pretty sure now she’ll graduate with an important major like Black Intersectional Autism or something.
I have been diagnosed with Youth Intersectional Autism. I am officially “Y. I. Auta”…
Isn’t remarkable that you can form a rather accurate opinion of someone intellectually and emotionally by just evaluating the way they choose appear in public?
Wearing a half-shirt while sporting such flabby mid-section implies inflated self-worth. The other option would have been “not caring”. However, the instant the individual strolls up to participate in an on camera discussion, the second option is moot. Then there is the twirling around (quite literally) when in disagreement. That is a sign of pent up frustration and immaturity. Grabbing the microphone despite it being held by another party suggests “my opinion is important than yours, so listen up.” Then, the voice goes up an octave suggesting an inability to show self-discipline, and emotions take over.
The default response shows up almost immediately when the host points out the factual percentages on gun violence. There was no consideration. There was no counter point. There was reflex. And, that required an ad hominem attack totally disassociated to the topic. “You’re evil. Oh, you’re evil.”
Then something very obvious occurs. When the woman was reciting the “narrative” and the “message” her voice was emotional and an octave higher. She felt she knew it better than the host and was going to school her. But, when she got trapped into a yes or no question about whether Charlie Kirk deserved to die, she has no prepared narrative for that, and her voice takes a quick dive back to normal level. She’s a walking emotion farm. The rest is just a woman trying to recover and obfuscate.
The truth is, people like this are fun to “play with.” You can wind them up one moment, and pull out their batteries the next. But, what really sets them off and causes the screaming, hitting and spitting is just to laugh at them.
Short version: The biggest disadvantage of a Progressive is that they are entirely predictable.
the short version, the university student just way too ready to ‘spout’ ie reflex regurgitate without
the very *core* reason for being at a university . . . . . to THINK.
So true. I’m old enough to remember that the original purpose of a “Liberal Arts” degree was “to learn how to learn.”
My next band, Cue the Puke.