The fellows at Triggernometry sum up what happened in America a few weeks ago.
We’ve already seen early glimpses of the forthcoming battles ahead, represented by these two forces:
- Democrats, RINOS, & the Deep State: DEI, Incompetence, unaccountability, endless corruption, endless wars, no free speech, bloated government bureaucracy, incestuous relationships with corporations, managed decline, increasing poverty for all but the elites, miserableness & depression
- Trump’s Republicans: Meritocracy, competence, accountability, consequences for corruption, no more forever wars, free speech, dramatically diminished government bureaucracy, free markets, positive growth, more prosperity for everyone, happiness
Of course, there are no guarantees that Trump et al will be able to carry out their MAGA & MAHA agenda but ask yourself who will be trying to stop them. Once you understand this, then you clearly know who supports The People and who are against us.
“ Of course, there are no guarantees that Trump et al will be able to carry out their MAGA & MAHA agenda ”
Exactly. Saw this post on X a couple days ago and saved it because I thought it sums up where we are and why it will take more than four years to reverse this intentional destruction of the country by the so called “Democrats” (Marxists really):
“ Steve Bannon basically said in 2016 that changing the trajectory of the country was at least a 20 year project. Obviously we won’t get everything we want all at once, that was never the point of Trump. His point is to expand what’s possible. So I don’t see a point in blackpilling. “
If not MAGA, where the f*ck would one start?
Publishing better options for fighting institutional corruption instead of bitching & whining about those giving it a real go would be a start.
The kiss of death.
Mitt Romney has endorsed Pam Bondi.
A scary thought indeed!
But Gaetz and DeSantis also like her – so there’s that.
I was ridiculed on another form for suggesting cautious optimism regarding Bondi, but I’m still going to double down and say “ring those damn alarm bells.”
Romney is just doing his usual slithering in , oozing in. The slime ball.
Romney is irrelevant.
Trump has surrounded himself with really smart, competent, action oriented people. They will be very cognizant of having to score some big wins early.
If they manage to do that, the momentum might be unstoppable and will have global impact.
The same might be said of Argentina.
I feel terrible for citizens of Western nations other than the US, including Canada, after watching that.
They’ve all just been shown the template for moving forward positively and productively, and escaping the ‘managed decline’ under which they currently suffer. What will they do with it?
I believe the trucker’s protest should have been the defining moment, the apex of movement towards positive change in Canada, but Tamara is still in legal limbo.
Echoing a theme in the conversation, Canada’s politicians are an enormous embarrassment to its citizens.
In last Saturday’s NP, Conrad Black suggested that a Conservative Renaissance was already underway with Italy’s Meloni leading the way, soon to be followed by DJT, Pollievre and in a few years, the most competent UK Conservative leader since Margaret Thatcher. I don’t recall him mentioning the brilliant leaders of Argentina and El Salvador.
The state’s may climb out of the hole.
Canada ? Long ways off …… before we even move an inch.
Pierre needs more than the same old slogan, and I’m already hearing people saying he’s to far right.
And if that has to happen for people to vote for a Conservative the bottom is all this country has going for it, and we might as well get there and only have one direction to go.
Same old, same old from the Conservatives gave us the Post National State, and it just didn’t become one overnight.
When it comes to Canada the wicked brain dead side of Liberalism has deep roots.
If, and a huge IF, the Trump administration scores some big wins early Canadian Conservatives might grow some balls prior to the next election.
They can grow back?
// prosperity for everyone, happiness //
Heh
Optimism, as the Futurists showed, doesn’t actually require much of a vision for what a better world would look like. Marinetti’s political philosophy basically turned on a rejection of classicism and formalism, a celebration of individualism, and a fetishization of technology.
But because it called for a blind run into the unknown, it was an inherently optimistic philosophy.
In the absence of anything practical or real, Mussolini was able to use that aesthetic and ideology as a trojan horse for totalitarianism.
And when he did, Italians thought they were entering a new era of hope.
https://www.bugeyedandshameless.com/p/the-utopian-pessimist-manifesto