But Manitoba can’t be part of it.
RCMP Charge Man for Defending Property from Repeat Offenders
4 Thieves in stolen vehicles attempted to rob a rural property in south-central Manitoba but were stopped by the 66-year-old property owner, armed with a firearm.
RCMP charged the property owner@WabKinew praised RCMP pic.twitter.com/S4F3nuuWUn
— CCFR/CCDAF (@CCFR_CCDAF) August 19, 2026
Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. The homeowner was well within his natural rights to protect his own property from thieves. The RCMP was 100% wrong. What are you supposed to do on a rural property when the RCMP are too far away? Yell louder? At my house, the police response time is 20 minutes because it is a rural property. Only city dwellers don’t get it.
12, 6, what if, bla bla bla
NONE OF THAT MATTERS NOT ONE TITCH OF A WHISPER
they guy still got charged, still has to shell out 10s of 1000s defense lawyer
and it can and will STILL happen to anyone else.
No good deed will go unpunished.
Shithole Snow Mexico.
“rural property”
When seconds count, police are only minutes away.
All this is teaching people is to not even bother calling the police. Just take care of business and dig a deep hole.
exactly.
and in the worst scenario, you have to kill them all aka no witnesses.
the ‘rules’ then makes the situation MORE problematic.
The wonderful thing about soviet canuckistan is that, after you kill the first one, you can kill as many as you want for free!
King Ralph said it best: shoot, shovel and shut up.
When the perps are named … identified … I’ll start listening to the RCMP.
Betcha they are injuns. They’ll just Gladue’d out of the system or pulling each other in a sweat lodge or some such stupid indian shit.
And that is why Alberta needs to boot the RCMP out. After all, Ontario has had their provincial police for over 100 years and they were put in place when the population of Ontario was less than half of the current population of Alberta.
Speaking of human rights …
https://mol.im/a/16063997
Canada’s full of weirdos. Esp. Chief(s) running claws
1. When I first read of this event I thought the home owner would have been charged with careless use of a firearm. (warning shots)
2. I’d sit on that (sovereign) jury…
january 2025 l was told by a cop with a smirk on his face that tenants were (exact quote) “entitled” to have guests. in my case these ‘guests’ were among other things
-stealing
-damaging property
-doing drugs, turning my home into a crackhouse
-threatening me.
thinking l had the answer, l posed the Q to the 911 operator “what if my dog (a large very strong part mastiff) bit an intruder?” thinking they wd agree to act.
instead comes the reply “then we will seize the animal and put it down for being aggressive” at which point l concluded they WANTED some quasi-homeless person to get bit so they could KILL MY BELOVED AND PROTECTIVE BOY.
oddly enough not an extraordinary time after that, 3 cops in the news shot dead, tranna, montreal and another one, and one more a rookie killed in a car crash.
it is truly wonderfully satisfying when cops are dead.
That is an absolutely asinine comment. Absolutely asinine.
So the home-owner is outnumbered four to one and he is on his own property and the perps are there uninvited and in the act of helping themselves to whatever and he is charged. He’ll have the legal bill to defend himself in court whereas the perps will get a public defender and will possibly walk with no prison time, but this twit of a commentator argues that the homeowner could possibly have killed someone!!!!????. This is the result of getting educated in Canada, it would never occur to anyone on the left that the homeowner could have been killed!!!! It is and has been abundantly clear for decades that the average Canadian has been denied the right of self-defence by a government that does not govern but rules. As the American Constitution states the right to self-defence is granted by a power higher than any elected government. Since Canadians have ceded this right they are no longer a free nation and are only subjects to be taxed and abused by the dictators they keep electing into office. If it wasn’t so tragic it would be comical. “The True North Strong and Free.” should be removed from the national anthem, nothing more than a refuge for grifters, con-men, thieves, and crooks, financed by spaghetti spined tax-payers who placate themselves by saying “Well we’re not Americans!” Only in Canada you say! Pity that!
Agree, Antenor.
“The homeowner could have killed someone” is an asinine statement.
He fired towards the vehicles, not towards the perps, who are unnamed for a reason.
If he had any intention of killing them, he could have done so.
He didn’t.
The cops, media, and this silly prof are acting as though the owner had fired at them, trying to hit them.
Are our urban spawn so indoctrinated that they think the mere presence of a firearm indicates criminal actions?
I side with law enforcement; the property owner was the only one in this story enforcing the law.