33 Replies to “I Want A New Country”

  1. Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. The homeowner was well within his natural rights to protect his own property from thieves. The RCMP was 100% wrong. What are you supposed to do on a rural property when the RCMP are too far away? Yell louder? At my house, the police response time is 20 minutes because it is a rural property. Only city dwellers don’t get it.

    1. 12, 6, what if, bla bla bla
      NONE OF THAT MATTERS NOT ONE TITCH OF A WHISPER
      they guy still got charged, still has to shell out 10s of 1000s defense lawyer
      and it can and will STILL happen to anyone else.

      1. So what do you propose, kritter?

        I agree, and stated clearly, that the RCMP was wrong, and he should not have been charged. My situation is very much the same as the accused so I sympathize, and I ask again, what do you propose to do in future as voting conservative has not helped elect anyone with an opposing view? I am asking for discussion from you as you criticized my post. I truly want to know what you think should be done.

        1. time and again l tell ppl around me dont ever call the cops.
          ‘there is no situation they cant make worse’
          vigilantism. we ‘take the law in our own hands’
          have a contingency plan if you have to gun down a prowler have a network of like minded who will help ‘clean up the mess’ turn it into that scene at the end of ‘Casino’ joe pesci’s character is getting buried in a cornfield.
          no one ever mentions the event ever again. even in deepest secret as a ‘sign’ a variant of ‘omerta’ applies.
          problem is Canaduh is infested with squealing undisciplined high school caliber string puppets. so start by musing about things, feel them out, make it hypothetical and accept at some point you have to trust the other guys to stick to the plan.
          or get the h-e-hockey sticks out of this post national state.

  4. All this is teaching people is to not even bother calling the police. Just take care of business and dig a deep hole.

    1. exactly.
      and in the worst scenario, you have to kill them all aka no witnesses.
      the ‘rules’ then makes the situation MORE problematic.

      1. The wonderful thing about soviet canuckistan is that, after you kill the first one, you can kill as many as you want for free!

    1. Betcha they are injuns. They’ll just Gladue’d out of the system or pulling each other in a sweat lodge or some such stupid indian shit.

  6. And that is why Alberta needs to boot the RCMP out. After all, Ontario has had their provincial police for over 100 years and they were put in place when the population of Ontario was less than half of the current population of Alberta.

  8. 1. When I first read of this event I thought the home owner would have been charged with careless use of a firearm. (warning shots)
    2. I’d sit on that (sovereign) jury…

  9. january 2025 l was told by a cop with a smirk on his face that tenants were (exact quote) “entitled” to have guests. in my case these ‘guests’ were among other things
    -stealing
    -damaging property
    -doing drugs, turning my home into a crackhouse
    -threatening me.
    thinking l had the answer, l posed the Q to the 911 operator “what if my dog (a large very strong part mastiff) bit an intruder?” thinking they wd agree to act.
    instead comes the reply “then we will seize the animal and put it down for being aggressive” at which point l concluded they WANTED some quasi-homeless person to get bit so they could KILL MY BELOVED AND PROTECTIVE BOY.
    oddly enough not an extraordinary time after that, 3 cops in the news shot dead, tranna, montreal and another one, and one more a rookie killed in a car crash.
    it is truly wonderfully satisfying when cops are dead.

      1. nothing asinine, just the ‘3 s’ rule didnt apply.
        – cops knew of the situation.
        -not a rural setting
        -l have no firearms to kill intruders
        it is NOT ‘asinine’ to gleefully celebrate when the worst bullies you have EVER
        contended with wind up dead in large numbers. always in the news.
        keeping tabs. lm winning.
        in 2005 l was on CBC news praising, sympathizing and cooperating with the locals following a tragic home invasion and multiple murder. 2 months later the most demoralizing insult in my whole life and EVERYONE let them ‘get away with it’.
        tq Karma for killing cops. so theres some more ‘asinineness’ for ya.
        p.s. google ‘violence ontario elementary schools’ oh look, the teachers that
        -beat me in grade 1 for having my face in a book
        -ignored me for an entire school year when l got plopped into 3-4 class adding to *her* work load, (she had already covered long division so l figured it out myself by ‘reverse engineering’ when her favorites showed off on the blackboard)
        -gr 5 teacher threatened to flunk me “for 2 pins”. wow. such encouragement eh?
        uhuh. now its THEM on the receiving end of the blind hate? tq again Ms Karma l DO get a great sense of satisfaction over this long overdue ‘comeuppance’

        1. My daughter is a police officer in an Alberta city. If you said “it is truly wonderfully satisfying when cops are dead” to my face, you wouldn’t be standing very long.

    2. So I read the rest of your posts. You would suggest that killing the perpetrators is the answer.

      “and in the worst scenario, you have to kill them all aka no witnesses. the ‘rules’ then makes the situation MORE problematic.”

      And yet, when confronted with people

      “january 2025 l was told by a cop with a smirk on his face that tenants were (exact quote) “entitled” to have guests. in my case these ‘guests’ were among other things
      -stealing
      -damaging property
      -doing drugs, turning my home into a crackhouse
      -threatening me.”

      You didn’t use your own advice (no one died), and you were therefore not charged and not arrested. So given the obvious trauma of your past events, which I can appreciate and sympathize with, what would you do and did you do instead? Or did the events continue unabated?

      Thanks for your posts.

      2. l sold the place and moved in with a buddy.
        and drafted a comprehensive document detailing my grievances for the police services board starting with “board member:
        there appears to be a possibility malfeasance committed by London police soon led to the deaths of 7 other cops in and around this city and 3 family members of one of them. did that get your attention?”

        l still find it jaw dropping sequence of events the death of 10 ppl in the area police community follwed the utter worst psychological damaging event in my life. never before or since anywhere in Canaduh
        -that many
        -that fast
        -all clustered around same city

        and then they threaten to kill my puppy if he reflexively defends his territory from an obvious aggressor, aaaaaaaand sho nuff 4 more of them kaputz.
        is there a pattern here?
        do not confuse the factual information with my bitterness and great satisfaction when they slam into some Karma. also is an apology not befitting? the fact there is none reinforces my opinion about ‘hard core unrepentant bullies getting what they deserve’

  10. So the home-owner is outnumbered four to one and he is on his own property and the perps are there uninvited and in the act of helping themselves to whatever and he is charged. He’ll have the legal bill to defend himself in court whereas the perps will get a public defender and will possibly walk with no prison time, but this twit of a commentator argues that the homeowner could possibly have killed someone!!!!????. This is the result of getting educated in Canada, it would never occur to anyone on the left that the homeowner could have been killed!!!! It is and has been abundantly clear for decades that the average Canadian has been denied the right of self-defence by a government that does not govern but rules. As the American Constitution states the right to self-defence is granted by a power higher than any elected government. Since Canadians have ceded this right they are no longer a free nation and are only subjects to be taxed and abused by the dictators they keep electing into office. If it wasn’t so tragic it would be comical. “The True North Strong and Free.” should be removed from the national anthem, nothing more than a refuge for grifters, con-men, thieves, and crooks, financed by spaghetti spined tax-payers who placate themselves by saying “Well we’re not Americans!” Only in Canada you say! Pity that!

    1. Agree, Antenor.
      “The homeowner could have killed someone” is an asinine statement.
      He fired towards the vehicles, not towards the perps, who are unnamed for a reason.
      If he had any intention of killing them, he could have done so.
      He didn’t.
      The cops, media, and this silly prof are acting as though the owner had fired at them, trying to hit them.
      Are our urban spawn so indoctrinated that they think the mere presence of a firearm indicates criminal actions?

  11. I side with law enforcement; the property owner was the only one in this story enforcing the law.

  12. L – To Serve and Protect was a decal on every police car, something engendering mutual trust and respect. I’ve not seen that for years. Retired peace officers are the most cynical group in Canada. Protecting the Rights of citizens provided a meaning equivalent to a vocation, a calling to serve. A trust society was a wonderful thing.

    Wolves don’t make the best sheepdogs! But for a war on the morally innocent, they are essential.

    Under Cult. Marxism, individual citizens have no inalienable, God given Rights. The police can only serve the State.

    Those advocating Independence, could offer halving the rate of serious crime within a year. This simply, by incarcerating said criminals long enough to take them out of business. 10% of workers produce 50% of the productivity- Price’s Law. The percentage of repeat offenders drives the high rate of crime, something simply remedied.

    Sir Robert’s 9 Rules of policing could also be reinstated ! All it takes is the will to make it so. The wisdom of our ancestors. Transcendental values, the guiding star to peace, prosperity and longevity. Man the lifeboats, hoist the sail. Be Not Afraid !

    1. ah.
      the fender decals.
      l recently mused what it would cost to have some big plastic color matched stickers made up
      to cover the ‘deeds not words’ with a big fat ‘MAKE ME’

  13. Sadly, I lost respect for the RCMP in 1988 when it was discovered that they were burning down barns in Quebec trying to blame the Separatists. They have NOT covered themselves with glory since then.
    When AB and SK separate, then RCMP Depot can be moved to Manitoba since the RCMP seem to love low-lifes. And I agree, it is very telling that the perpetrators’ names have not been released – I think I know which demographic they represent.

    1. RCMP burned down the Rose’s barn in May 1972.
      I don’t know of a second barn burning … can u provide some info?

  14. They want you, and will have you, disarmed.
    Once that happens, and it will, hooboy look out!
    They can barely contain their disdain for you now.
    Unarmed, all those grade 7 hall monitors who became Liberals will run every aspect of your life.
    Even more than now.
    Even your squeaks and eeks will be squelched.
    Nuremberg now.

  15. “He could easily have killed one of these.” Exactly. But he didn’t. He likely merely shot at them. That’s called proportionate force. This is a joke charge for scaring off the wildlife.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation