A great rant from Dave Portnoy, asking the simple question that Leftists refuse to answer:
If you don't like my political rants don't watch this. But how can Kamala Harris keep calling herself the candidate of change when she is the sitting VP? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Vote for whoever you want but I had to point out how crazy it is.
Ps – I know people… pic.twitter.com/E0KHlVaJBo
— Dave Portnoy (@stoolpresidente) October 14, 2024
Then : Hope and Change
Now : Joy and Change
There’s nothing to Change but Change itself.
Maybe she means The Candidate Who is Always Changing and her theme song could be Kama Kama Kama Kama Kama-Chameleon.. In other words, no integrity.
Racist Liberals are sexist too, more of the same wars, inflation, illegal aliens, violence, is all fine by them.
It’s good enough for racist Liberals to see black skin and female, that’s the only change.
Looked like an audition for a very bad soap opera. You’d have to be a much better actress to pull that shit off.
they ALL harp about ‘change’. most have some idea what to change more have some idea how etc.
this clucking high school pajama party bimbo merely repeats with no concept what or how. sloganeering, populistism, cluck cluck cluck
Without giving specifics of what the changes will be, the word “change” means nothing.
It is merely trying to sell an image – and to many, image matters more than reality.
So far, she has given no real specifics. Just blah blah.
“Hi, I’m the candidate of change! You wouldn’t have any change, would you?”
otoh, shouldnt she be ranting about the biden/ie democrat record?
instead of harping about ‘moving forward’ from a previous FAILED ADMINISTRATION?
Thomas Sowell has already spoken on this:
“The staunchest conservatives advocate a range of changes which differ in specifics, rather than in number or magnitude, from the changes advocated by those considered liberal…change, as such, is simply not a controversial issue. Yet a common practice among the anointed is to declare themselves emphatically, piously, and defiantly in favor of change. Thus those who oppose their particular changes are depicted as being against change in general. It is as if opponents of the equation 2+2=7 were depicted as being against mathematics. Such a tactic might, however, be more politically effective than trying to defend the equation on its own merits. ”
FWIW
“Love, you are the tired old playbook.”
https://x.com/KamalaHarris/status/1845272011037139381
Via https://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2024/10/love-you-are-the-tired-old-playbook.html
Princess Fellatia, author of the “Opportunity Economy” last week stated she could not think of any action taken by her administration in the last 4 years that she would change.
So that means if Kamala is elected, the next 4 years will feature an additional 35% increase in energy prices, an additional 22% increase in food prices, and the entry of 12 million more criminal illegal aliens into the United States.
Change you can believe in, and opportunity only for citizens of other countries, especially countries that are enemies of the United States.
Would only that were true. There is inertia in the system which takes time to overcome, the effect of the policies that are in place now will take time to correct, just as they took time to take effect. Four more years on the existing glide path will be considerably worse than the first four.