In art news:
The decision to adorn what was once the Women’s Museum with a, shall we say, transitioning figure, this “nourishing man,” is likely an attempt to comply with prevailing fashions regarding those individuals who are somewhat at odds with their physical selves. A trans-friendly gesture. Or, as the museum puts it, somewhat coyly, a sign of “gender inclusivity.”
It occurs to me, however, that a man being given large doses of cross-sex hormones and subsequently developing facsimile breasts isn’t going to lactate anything remotely nourishing for a child. Given sufficiently high doses of female hormones, and given sufficiently zealous pumping, some men can be made to secrete a substance from their nipples, albeit unreliably and in very limited quantities – but the resulting discharge is of no nutritional value to an infant.
Brings a whole new meaning to mother-in-law.
Life Follows Art dept.
Mother 2009 – the other Bong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oBwQHWeYxo&t=2s
The left in a nutshell. Build on lies, phony and of no nutritional value.
Good pun….nutshell!
Trust-fund brats destroy works of art in museum in the name of “the climate”.
Yet this statue remains standing.
hahahaha to infinity.
“Oh, there’s more.”
For others, maybe. Too depressing to read this trans BS. Bill Maher hopefully is right, in his fears that this trans BS will drive people from woke establishmentarianism.
Regarding trans breast feeding, the infant would probably get more nourishment if it latched onto the lower appendage!