41 Replies to “The Elites That Rule Us”

  1. As usual Neil hits the nail right on the head.

    When will this line of reason reach the common people and resonate with them to such a degree that the Americans, Canadians, Australians, and Brits rise as one an state “Enough is Enough!”

  2. Britain sucks and so does Canada. They should be dismantled, and mass immigration will be vital to building a superior replacement.

    1. Because the Middle East is the true center of civilized culture now, right? And Africa. Can’t forget those guys.

      When’s that Middle East moon rocket going up again? Oh, I remember now, -never-.

          1. On Big Bad Musk’s dependable , reliable , Falcon 9 Block 5 booster.
            A private corp American built rocket.

    2. “mass immigration will be vital to building a superior replacement.”…… just like it has done since the 70’s here in Canada. Immigration is good when those being allowed into the country have a skill that will help to build a better Country,and they can contribute to society as a whole, right now if it breaths and has family back home they are welcomed and immediately put onto the welfare plan. No wonder we are heading into Third World Territory!!!!!! Steve O

      1. There is no evidence of some mass welfare expenditure on immigration, and even if there was, the benefits vastly outweigh it.

        1. You’re clearly insane.
          Please respond appropriately and hang yourself.

        2. *
          Unme states… “no evidence of some mass welfare expenditure on
          immigration”

          How about Justin’s 50,000 Syrian Refugees? There’s a success story,
          huh?

          NOT SURE THE NAKED BURGLAR IS THE VICTIM HERE

          “Majd Darwich moved his family from Syria to Canada in 2016, hoping
          to find a safe place for his son, who is autistic and non-verbal. But he is
          NOW CONTEMPLATING LEAVING after his son was Tasered during an
          interaction with Peel Regional Police a week ago.”

          GoFundMe to return Darwich family to kinder, gentler Syria?

          *

        3. You are certifiably nuts. Do you have any rational thought processes? UnMe is most appropriate for your name.

      2. Most people think about immigration the way they think about almost everything else — they don’t think at all.

        Immigration isn’t a force of nature that spontaneously materializes, it’s a government policy.

        The government must answer four questions with respect to immigration policy: 1) where in the world to get the immigrants, 2) how many, 3) what kind of immigrants to be chosen within the preferred area, and 4) how long will the process continue.

        In Canada, a holistic and explicit discussion of these questions has NEVER taken place within political debate. To a large extent, even politicians themselves don’t interfere in the specifics; the permanent state (the mandarins) answer the four questions. Accordingly, immigrants in Canada do not arrive as a result of random happenstance, they are the result of the state’s specific policy, and their presence is a manifestation of deliberate choices being made. The reasonable assumption is that the choices are always made in support of unspoken government objectives.

        1. In the past, roughly speaking, the RATE of immigration increased under Liberal regimes, and decreased under Conservative ones. Wars and economic depressions were also factors, of course. There were also exceptions. The rate of immigration both rose and fell within the long Trudeau I regime. The rate of immigration actually decreased somewhat under Chretien. In the “modern” Conservative era, the rate of immigration increased strongly under the Mulroney and Harper regimes. Consequently, as far as the pace of immigration is concerned, it appears as though there is truly a uniparty in Canada now.

        2. The government must answer four questions with respect to immigration policy: 1) where in the world to get the immigrants, 2) how many, 3) what kind of immigrants to be chosen within the preferred area, and 4) how long will the process continue.

          Assuming the number of immigrants to be selected in any given year is finite, these questions offer a good example of opportunity cost; i.e., the cost of the choice NOT taken. For instance, if a government mandarin decrees immigrants will come from countries x, y, and z, she is implicitly saying they will NOT come from countries a, b, or c. The choice of exclusion is just as conscious and deliberate as the positive choice. Similarly with the other selection criteria.

          Considering government interventions and actions are generally destructive and/or incompetent, perhaps even in certain cases malevolent, why should immigration policy be the exception?

        3. Indeed, we are being consciously replaced. Just watch today’s TV commercials. The marketplace knows what the game is about.

          1. Rob.

            !!!…INDEED…!!!
            NARY A white face to be seen..ever…!

            Totally as per WEF spec. Eliminate us supposedly “RACIST” Whites WORLD WIDE with sub Saharan -Eastern African migrants, along with throngs of compliant Asians….ALL easier to control.

        4. There’s no need for or benefit from the central planning implied by these questions. It is not government’s place to pick and choose who comes here beyond extra vigilance for bad countries like Pakistan. The correct answer is ‘open immigration’ which is what built Canada and America.

          1. “The correct answer is ‘open immigration’ which is what built Canada and America.”

            No, and horse sh!t.

    3. *
      “Britain sucks and so does Canada. They should be dismantled…”

      Well, UnHinged… we’ll see how you feel come ‘Sharia Law.’

      *

        1. Just as I thought, you ARE a Mongol! And in fine racist (not to mention, ungrateful) fettle, as per the norm for your type. The Pony Tail Tax was a friggin’ sweet deal for your great-grandpa. Now be a good coolee and stop your whingeing! It didn’t happen to you. Just like the famines in Central/Northern Europe last century didn’t happen to me.

        2. Hongcouver

          Now why does that not surprise me one iota.

          Of course you do…NDP ass kissing Useless idiot.

        3. Thank you for the reply despite the bit of vagueness. [no sarc]

          Vancouver doesn’t exactly run the gamut of Canadian immigration ethnicities, does it?

          Vancouver Demographics [2021 census*]
          ———————-
          European[b] (43.22%)
          East Asian[c] (29.26%)
          Southeast Asian[d] (9.1%)
          South Asian (6.9%)
          Latin American (2.78%)
          Middle Eastern[e] (2.44%)
          Indigenous (2.25%)
          African (1.31%)
          Other[f] (2.74%)
          [* Wikipedia’s pie graph uses the most-racist colour scheme imaginable, matching perceived skin colours!]

    4. The Micro Nova blast that our Sun will blow off and reach our Earth will be on the other side of the world this time but we were hit last time that’s why North and South America were uninhabited for a long while…

      Where do you think the Rockies came from…

      The Official .gov Approved Science…

      2030… 2040…

      Galactic Current Sheet | Solar System Shif

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N3s01hCDyyw

      Disaster Playlist

      https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSoxioQtwZf1-8QeggXIVdZ-abyJXaO1

      1. That is why there is a population move people….

        Also a mass kill off…

        Wear your mask…

        Get your shots…

        Treating us as farm animals…

        Evil…

  3. “Britain” was just imperial propaganda ripped off from ancient, celtic Britannia… so the English could placate the Welsh, the Scots, the Cornish, etc., and make them believe that they belonged in one big imperial family. There is no “British” ethnicity, or culture, and even the English have been a dog’s breakfast of various tribal ethnicities. The true heart of “Britishness” is the City of London Corporation. If bankster financialism or American protection ever fades, “Britain” will dry up and blow away. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

    1. Mostly correct about the warring tribes.
      Per historian Arthur Bryant in his History of England, Makers of the Realm, (1953) …Alfred of Wessex, circa 849 to 899AD, made peace with the invading barbaric Danes and began the unification of the multiple kingdoms within Britain, Wales, Scotland et al. Alfred is credited with creating a kingdom to which all Englishmen felt they belonged and a literature which enshrined their culture and traditions.
      “More than any other man he was the first maker of England.”
      Too true as of late his great creation is being unraveled.

      1. I always thought the most recent version of Britain was influenced by Imperial Rome.
        As they say, all roads lead to Rome.
        Guess not.

        1. Prior to Alfred, the Romans had indeed occupied Britain some 1600 years ago and for 300 years created a great civilization in Britain. In 410AD The Visigoths sacked Rome itself and Britain was cut off from that civilization although its influence was felt for about another fifty years. The Saxons and various sea raiders invaded a defenseless Britain and destroyed most of what remained of Rome’s culture.
          The ensuing part of British history, until Alfred, is pretty much a horror story of endless raids and battles.

          1. The ensuing part of British history, until Alfred, is pretty much a horror story of endless raids and battles.

            Resources…

            Nothing has changed…

            Our Resources are dwindling…

            Starvation Nations is our future for all the global packs our .gov’s, signed and sold via health sciences and media…

            Fake Wars…

            All to kill us…

            Pick a side…

      1. Unbrained…
        With you jumping right in behind said book.
        Your proper resting place.

        ..in a garbage bin

  4. Nationalism is bad until you need it.. Take your idiot Ukraine war as a example.. Nobody cares and thats fine.. But if a real war were to happen?..

Navigation