I, Napoleon

26 Replies to “I, Napoleon”

1. Typical leftist politician. They start babbling and become evasive when they’re cornered.

   Then again, we know about that sort of thing here in (former) Canada, don’t we? Prime Minister Trousersnake (to borrow the name from Ferris Beuller’s Day Off) is well-known for that. You know, it might be quite entertaining to see him respond to the same question.

   1. Babbling because they CANNOT answer the question without LOSING the entire Trans-nonsense “debate”.

      And BTW what sort of nonsense is this woman babbling about women suffering discrimination? Really? Where? In British culture? Nonsense. There is only ONE PLACE women are suffering … Islam. Women are discriminated against by Islam. Kick Islam out of England … and you’ll END ALL discrimination against women in England.

2. Proof positive that our political “leaders” are amongst the stupidest people in society.

   1. Who’s the bigger fool, the fool or the one who keeps electing them.

   2. Its throne thing that saves us. Imagine if we had a smart Hitler or really smart Stalin.

3. Getting a politician to prevaricate, obfuscate and squirm. Wow!

4. Could she point to where his cervix is?

5. It’s a simple biological question.

   The next time someone meanders on such a question, deliver a sharp slap upside the head.

6. missed asking the proper empty hair question. what colour are your socks today

7. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg3Xs_x9Kco

8. [deleted. Off topic. – ED]

   1. [deleted. Off topic. – ED]

   2. [deleted. Off topic. – ED]

9. Absolutely fucking insane.

   One imagines all the people who have lived in the history of the world to the last 30 years watching this stuff with their jaws on their chests.

10. Life Follows Art dept.

    Absolutely Fabulous was hugely influential…=)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj3ZWhlmexw

11. What she really means is shut up you fat whitey.

    Or

    This is how you question a conservative politician.

12. Textbook example of “Doublethink”

13. How could that poor elected sociopath, hell-bent on defending the fantasy world of gender pretense be expected to acknowledge reality in the form of a question? Woke gender-pretense is a pillar of nihilism that must be maintained on blind faith as no one should have to rely on their lying eyes and thereby question the dismantling of civilization for political ends. If the question was, “should we abolish individual liberty by hollowing out our culture so that enlightened totalitarians like you can control every aspect of our lives?”, she would answer in the same stupefied stuttering blather. Obviously there is no point in being shocked at the mentality of those who elected someone that vile as they live among us in large numbers.

    1. right you are J.C.!
       the question is moot, because the answer is verboten – she makes that clear. she knows the classic western response: it’s simple; but she lives in a complicated parallel world, where political correctness compels cognitive dissonance. even politicians cannot resist the comfort of claiming to be nonplussed so as to evade that crippling condition.
       one correct answer from the parallel world would be–
       trans women have a trans cervix. and if asked… “and what, pray tell, is that exactly?” – the correct answer would be, “why anything you want it to be, of course.”

       losing your balance when asked a simple question will always be followed by more serious questions.
       as you have pointed out, it is totally unrealistic to expect a serious response.
       and people wonder why some politicians are less popular than dentists, lawyers, and serial killers. 🙂

14. I wish there where journalists that would use that method when having the sock monkey do a press conference.
    Cut him off in one of his word salads with;

    “With all due respect, that’s not the question I asked”

15. So many actual, serious problems in the UK, and these idiots on all sides wasting time with political doublespeak and gotcha! word games.

    Women have cervixes. Trans men also have cervixes. ~99.9% of the time, “individuals with a cervix” means “women”. The rest of the time, it means “trans men”. If the American Cancer Society is updating its cancer screening guidelines and decides to say “individuals with a cervix“ instead of “women” because trans men also get cervical cancer, who cares? And conversely, whether or not it’s transphobic to say “women” depends on the context and the intent; almost always, it’s not, unless you’re Piers Morgan seeking attention on Twitter.

    1. Who cares? Female athletes competing against “trans women” for one, might have a word or two to say about that.

       To “pretend” to be something you aren’t is delusional, and I for one will not support someone’s delusions. I live in the real world, not in someone’s perverse fantasy land.

16. She answered the question. “I am not comfortable talking about woman’s body parts” Previously she differentiated between women and Trans women then referred to women’s body parts without including trans. She must apologize and resign immediately.

    1. You noticed that to, eh?

17. Hilarious. She makes Foster Brooks seem like the President of Toastmasters Intl.

18. A training video for SOCKS the TurD’Oh