48 Replies to “Mischief Is Important”

  1. Just another day in Kabul…pity the poor folks who remain.

    I gather FAKEBOOK couldn’t censor BILLBOARDS…ha, ha, ha 🙂

    Priceless!

    Cheers

    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group “True North”

    1. If the poor folk who remained were concerned their 300,000 man western trained and equipped army would have put up a fight. We were being played by the ANA from Day One.

      1. Without googling take a guess at the total number of Afghan security forces killed since the start of the war is estimated to be?

        2. I had to spend some time digging but from what I could find the total number of Afghan security forces dead (to date) is estimated to be somewhere around 66-69000.
          Roughly the same number of civilians.

          US dead around 2300
          British 457
          Cdn 159

          Let’s dispense with the idea the the Afghans are to blame. We used them and their country to bleed off some of the jihadis Pakistan was pumping out that might have otherwise gone elsewhere and done other nefarious things. The nation building/women’s rights story was something we cooked up to make it palatable to the kinder half our population. We did what we could but then lost interest and turned our backs on all of it only to shrug and say “the Afghanis should have tried harder.”

          The ones that tried are dead or are about to be, and over here we’re hysteric, hiding in our houses and abusing our kids and elderly because of a bad flu. Pathetic.

      2. For what it is worth I think your blame is misplaced. The ANA fought and they died in droves. Blaming them or the Afghan people is the narrative Biden’s handlers are pushing but the uncomfortable truth seems to be that the US straight up abandoned their allies and fled after stripping the ANA of their Air Force. The only real question is was it a deliberate premeditated betrayal or was it just to sheer incompetence. My money is on the former.

        I never deployed to Afghanistan but have plenty of close friends and acquaintances who did, some of whom came back in pieces or in a box. What the US (and to a lesser extent our own government) did there in the end is to spit on all of them.

        1. The Forever War.

          https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/analysis-afghan-mission-was-doomed-to-fail-but-canadian-leaders-refused-to-listen

          Afghan Turkmen leader Akbar Bey warned in 2008 that the west could not change Afghanistan and predicted that war would be ultimately lost and the Taliban would be victorious. “If American and NATO soldiers leave Afghanistan at four o’clock, at six o’clock (the Afghan government) will collapse,” he told Canadian journalist Scott Taylor for a documentary on Afghanistan.

        2. Yes. Trump had put in place an agreement with all parties tht would have seen the withdrawal by April of this year. The Dems tore that up because of TDS.

      3. Planes loaded with 600 Afghan military age men that ran away from their homes, wives, families, sex slave boy’s & girls after
        we spent billions teaching them Gender studies from Kabul university.
        Millions of Afghanistan refugees going into Europe, hope all those pos that wanted Trump impeached enjoy their new neighbors. Ha

  2. That is not mischief; that is simply pointless.

    Everybody in the world knows, that Biden has never been in charge. From before the inauguration. From before the election. From before he was even confirmed as the candidate. The world has known he was unfit, already in the mid stages of dementia or senility.

    So why are you talking about him now? What is the point of flashing the picture of a random Alzheimer’s patient?

    The following is a short list of people who are far more responsible than Grandpa Badfinger. That is; greater than ZERO.

    This is Jake Tapper’s failure.
    This is Jennifer Rubin’s failure.
    This is general Milley’s failure.
    This is ACB’s failure.
    This is SCOTUS’ failure.
    This is the Pennsylvania supreme court’s failure.
    This is the FBI’s failure.
    This is CNN’s failure.
    This is the CIA’s failure.
    This is Homeland Security’s failure.
    This is the EPA’s failure.
    This is the Board of Education’s failure.
    This is the GOPe’s failure.
    This is Georgia’s failure.
    This is Wisconsin’s failure.
    This is California’s failure.
    This is New York’s failure.

    Biden is the last and most irrelevant link in a long chain of failure. Go up the chain, naming those names instead.

    Honestly, Biden will be dead before too long. Pretty clear he is not in good health. Then Harris, who is also not in charge, will be the irrelevant name people use.

    Seriously, what will you accomplish, if you get Biden removed, but leave all the other garbage in place.

    1. Yes Biden has the anti-Trump scatological touch; his new slogan is:

      SO MUCH LOSING!

      Cheers

      Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

      1st Saint Nicolaas Army
      Army Group “True North”

      1. Seriously, pretty clear Biden is not even dressing himself these days, let alone deciding what to eat for breakfast. He hasn’t made a decision since last February or March, and definitely not any as president. He hasn’t written, or even read any of the executive orders he signed.

        He is just the fall guy for the swamp, so they can get away clean.

    2. It was funny. Everyone knows he was a figurehead to steal the election. The election stealing cabal is tpo blame.

    3. The people of America who allowed the fraud to succeed are the total and complete failure. Destroy the country for a ideology that has killed over 100 million people in the 20th century and expect it to work in America. Communism a disaster everywhere it gained a foothold. Canda will be going down hard as well and the whu who flu has been the vehicle used.
      I was a free man in Jan 2020, WTF am I now?

      1. Oh for God sakes don’t turn Gay on me.
        I would miss your witty humor…
        Are you starting to feel urge for make up and earrings?
        Step away from the television before your brain is fried by Trudeau love fest ads.
        Sheeplekind of a famine hygiene problem that Trudeau currently has.

    4. “Everybody in the world knows, that Biden has never been in charge.”

      The nomenklatura is in charge. The Politburo runs the day to day affairs of Empire as dictated by the nomenklatura.

    5. Yes Kevin, a cabal of State Dept. Harvard graduates under the age of 40 are responsible. Fundamentally … neo-Communists. They are dedicated to the complete “transformation” of America into a welfare state of dependency. And the core tenet of their Foreign Policy? Apology. Apologize for everything America has ever done. And that includes our “meddling” during WWII. After all, the Harvard grads secretly admire Hitler’s basic Dictatorship.

      Just Look at how these boys and girls are employing the Hillary Clinton Foreign Policy toward radical Islam. The core tenet of HER Foreign Policy? ”If we are nice to them, they will be nice to us”. The boys and girls running our country are actually BEGGING The TallyBahn to let our people go. Pretty please. Just as SHE left our Mission in Benghazi unguarded as a “signal” to the radical Islamic Terrorists that we “trust” them and consider them “equals” … our current State Dept. has left 20k+ Americans as hostages in hopes the TallyBahn will understand that we “trust them”. These Harvard graduates are certifiable psychotic mental patients. They are serial killers … for their own amusement. They are running another “experiment” in the ME … just as they are running the COVID “experiment” on the American people.

      And PS … we are ALL California now. Now that the election system has been terminally hacked (both electronically and physically stuffing the ballot boxes) … America has fallen to ONE PARTY rule. We’re fkcued if we can’t fix this.

      Make no mistake. Byedin-Heiress will be tossed aside … like a used tissue … as soon as he becomes unviable. And his disposal is coming soon.

  3. Biden has some how staved off terminal delirium, but the signs are there.

    I doubt if he can change his Depends or even realize that he needs to.

  4. “C’mon man! What about when I whisper at press conferences? That shows my cognitive depth, don’t it…?”

  6. Pretty good!

    There are still a few folks out there with a bit of wit and balls.

  7. This is a direct result of the US arming the Taliban’s precursor to oust the Soviets. The US armed Islamic nutbars then, and has just done so again. In-between, they armed ISIS in Iraq. and Syria.
    Withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan = Taliban take-over, no matter who’s in the driver’s seat. The only difference Trump would have made is that the withdrawal would have been orderly.
    The only reason western citizens are programmed to care about the Afghan women and children is because of all the mineral wealth there, as they sure don’t give a crap about women and children in nations with nothing, heck, in the west, its illegal to object to having your kid’s reproductive organs mutilated.

  8. It’s interesting how reactions to the Afghan fiasco ignore the usual partisan divide. On one side you’ve got the bloodthirsty warmongers, left and right, who want the Americans to stay forever to protect the sacred rights of Afghan girls and homos, and the fake “democracy” they imposed.

    On the other side you’ve got the sane and normal people, left and right, who are just glad this 20 year nightmare is finally over. This article by the lib-left, anti-white tribesman Matthew Yglesias is actually pretty good:

    “By the time Barack Obama took over, the basic pattern that would dominate years of failure was already in place. The Taliban was not crushed and had in fact established itself as a viable religious/nationalist resistance movement to the American-backed government. And the American-backed government was very corrupt and ineffective, displeasing lots of people and committing lots of abuses.

    This put the American forces serving in Afghanistan in a lot of awkward situations.

    In 2015, the New York Times ran a story headlined “U.S. Soldiers Told to Ignore Sexual Abuse of Boys by Afghan Allies.” It says about what you’d think. Then in 2018, the Times did a story headlined “Afghan Pedophiles Get Free Pass From U.S. Military, Report Says.” …..

    The military sold the then-new president Barack Obama on the idea that Bush had just bungled this and he could be the hero who saved Afghanistan. The idea was to send a huge surge of troops into the country, win back territory from the Taliban, and then force them to the negotiating table on favorable terms. It didn’t work, and then years later the military sold the then-new president Donald Trump on the idea that Obama had just bungled this and he could be the hero who saved Afghanistan. The idea was to do a modest surge of troops and a huge increase in airstrikes, win back territory from the Taliban, and then force them to the negotiating table on favorable terms.

    That also didn’t work, but my strong guess is that if Amy Klobuchar or Pete Buttigieg were in the White House, they would’ve been sold on the idea that Trump just bungled this and they could be the hero who saved Afghanistan. Biden, because he was around for the Obama-era surge debate, knew the game and pulled the plug.

    But I think this has led hawks to propound several fallacies.

    One is the idea that the light footprint we had on the ground right before the Taliban’s final push would have been sufficient to save the Afghan government. The very speed of the collapse says the opposite. The Taliban were taking it easy while American troops packed up. Had they stayed, the offensive would have come anyway. The Taliban would have advanced more slowly, but they would have advanced. And it’s not like the Biden administration would leave 3,000 soldiers trapped in Afghanistan to be killed or captured — they’d be reinforced. That was the policy choice, to continue with Trump’s withdrawal plan or to escalate.

    Another fallacy is to make Biden look bad by saying “well you may agree with the policy, but the execution of the policy here was a mess.” And certainly, the execution doesn’t look great. But the reason it’s such a mess is that the policy is one that the military has been revolting against across two presidents, and they were hoping as recently as last Thursday or Friday to jam Biden up into sending more troops.

    The final fallacy is to cite the speed of the collapse as evidence that Biden misjudged the situation, when really it’s evidence that the underlying mission was a horrific failure. If we left and then never lifted a finger as the Taliban mounted a painstakingly slow 10-year campaign to oust the government, I think a reasonable person might think one more year of American presence might have made a difference. But what we saw this week was that in 20 years, essentially zero progress had been made toward creating a sustainable Afghan military. …..

    https://www.slowboring.com/p/afghan-war

    1. Jeppo, I would like to add to your piece.
      The Western Nations boxed in science and innovation that the theories and physics laws were facts and couldn’t be changed or altered taught by our institutions and Universities.
      While Russia and China didn’t bother with this foolishness and created more powerful and quicker weapons that are classed as impossible by our boxed in school system.
      The United States and NATO tried to keep their massive military and equipment running to police the world, Russia and China went onto innovation and unmanned technology which quickly made people a liability in the battle field.

      As the United States and NATO spent vast sums of debt to keep this military might going as well as globalization to import off other countries, Russia and China built a military far more advanced.

        1. Do you know how Russia wins the WW3?
          The use of Oceans to create synchronized massive waves with nuclear weapons for maximum land damage.
          The United States were the masters of the sky while Russia became masters of the Oceans as the US has too many soft targets on the Oceans now being the obsolete technology of the past.

    2. jeppo

      With potentially 40K Americans still in Afghanistan, yah Biden and crew screwed up the wind down. Troop strength should have stayed strong enough to hold back the Taliban till most of the Americans and their Afigan “helpers” were out. That is not a hard thing to comprehend . Your article is simplistic in it’s approach to a complex issue.

      1. President Trump appeared on Maria Bartiroma this morning and laid out his evacuation plan, which included getting ALL Americans OUT …safely … before any further troop withdrawals … then removing all our military equipment, then bombing all our bases to smithereens. Simple. Obvious.

        President dottering Old feeble dementia patient took the advice of his 40 year old Foreign Policy expert graduates of Harvard and just evacuated State Dept. employees safely … then let all the “little people” Americans who were actually on the ground and in the cities DOING THE WORK OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT!!! try to get by TallyBahn checkpoints on their own.

        Harvard is poisoned “institution”. It should be shut-down IMMEDIATELY, as it is FAR more dangerous to every American than COVID ever hoped to be. Panty waist, limp-wristed, white boys and girls keep “graduating” from Harvard with a world view and belief system that is pure poison to America … and that includes EVERY variant in every field of study.

      2. With all respect you’re just making excuses for the utterly worthless military/intelligence community who have bungled this thing since day one. Finally a president had the balls to stand up to those lying scumbags and pull the plug once and for all.

        Here’s an excellent article by righteous liberal Michael Tracey, more proof that reactions to this transcend ideological lines:

        “Watch any corporate TV network this week and be treated to the ghoulish spectacle of indignant retired Generals trotting themselves out, one after another, to provide gravely judgmental commentary. David Petraeus somehow managed to find time between his many commitments on corporate boards and venture capital funds to opine that the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan has been “catastrophic.” Which is perversely fitting, in a way, because if anyone knows about Afghanistan-related catastrophe it’s David Petraeus.

        Seemingly forgotten in these solemn, reflective interviews is that under Petraeus’ command, the US incurred more fatalities than at any point over the course of the 20 year war — a fact that gets more insane the more you think about it. There were 917 US military fatalities in Afghanistan from 2010-2011, when Petraeus was head of the war effort. As we know, Osama bin Laden wasn’t even physically located in Afghanistan during that time; ask any average American what the purpose of those casualties supposedly was, and you’re bound to get blank stares. Somehow, though, that “catastrophe” has never quite tarnished the good image of Petraeus — he gets to put his legal troubles behind him and still play “expert” on TV.

        The sage “expertise” of Petraeus is compliantly sought even at nice liberal outfits like NPR and MSNBC, where he’s made the rounds in the past few days bemoaning how things ever could’ve gotten this bad in Afghanistan. In a sicko political and media culture, demands for resignation and cries of “shame” are not being directed at the likes of Petraeus — one of the intervention’s many failed architects — but instead at the officials who finally bit the bullet and terminated an intervention that was intrinsically doomed. HR McMaster has also jumped into the media fray, denouncing the withdrawal as a “catastrophe that we helped to precipitate.” He joins Petraeus in advocating for his long-felt wish of a “sustained commitment” in Afghanistan: in other words, staying forever. No word from McMaster on whether he helped “precipitate” any catastrophe by agitating for pointless continuation of the war while actually serving in government.

        It’s always enlightening to observe when corporate media organs temporarily transition from their standard posture of shrill, nonstop, apocalyptic threat-inflation about the supposed existential danger of conservative Republicans and find a different, less overtly partisan drum to beat for a while. That’s certainly what has been happening in the past several days, as the longest war in US history finally comes to a preposterously overdue close. Significantly more money, adjusted for inflation, was spent by US taxpayers on state-building in Afghanistan than was spent on the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe after World War II. And yet huge sectors of the media, in their pea-brained emotionalistic frenzy, have decided to impart the theory that just another few weeks/months/years of “conditions-based” US military engagement would’ve produced a withdrawal that passed all the requisite tests for nice-looking “optics.”

        The only “commitment” that the Afghanistan War “sustained” was to deceit, corruption, waste, and failure — a cycle that would’ve never been broken until the plug was belatedly pulled. The narrow outrage on display now about the allegedly “incompetent” execution of the withdrawal reflects a misunderstanding of the entire intervention, which was predicated on “incompetence.” And “incompetence” is an overly-kind word. More like systematic plunder, graft, and propaganda. If the Afghan government could collapse so quickly after billions and billions of dollars were funneled into it over 20 years, why would anyone expect a withdrawal to be carried out with seamless or “competent” precision? If you expected that, it’s safe to assume you’ve indulged in the same fantastical delusions that persisted throughout the whole conflict. I encourage everyone to watch this explanation given by Richard Hanania about how nit-picking the “incompetence” of the withdrawal is a fallacy that deflects from the “incompetence” at the very heart of the entire mission.

        Biden might be losing his marbles, but at least he made a firm decision to end the war and has stuck with that decision unrepentantly — even as he’s now swarmed by a furious political backlash. That’s more than can be said for his most recent two predecessors, both of whom went against their instincts and prolonged the war at the urging of chronically-wrong military officials — in many cases the same ones now on TV expressing sanctimonious outrage. Just breaking that repetitious cycle is an accomplishment unto itself. Despite being polar opposites temperamentally, Donald Trump and Barack Obama justified extensions of US military presence in Afghanistan by invoking speech-written cliches that were almost carbon copies of one another…

        In his remarks Monday defending the withdrawal, Biden repeated — as has been well-documented — that he was against the 2009 surge in Afghanistan ordered by Obama and administered by Petraeus. Twelve years later, who looks better in that argument?

        Meanwhile, former George W. Bush Administration officials are being summoned from their crypts and propped up on Fox to make loony “Bay of Pigs” comparisons. Jack Keane, another fossilized General called on to share his fake expertise with conservative TV viewers, cited the standard parallel to the Saigon evacuation — but added his apparent opinion that US forces never should’ve left Vietnam. So that’s the level of self-delusion we’re dealing with here. (Maybe I shouldn’t call them “fake experts.” They’re certainly among the world’s preeminent experts in military and strategic failure.)

        Shrieking pundits evidently ignored the release of the “Afghanistan Papers” in 2019 (which did get buried at the time, due to the first impeachment of Trump over something to do with Javelin missiles in Ukraine… who can even recall anymore?). Sifting through those documents, the only viable conclusion is that the entire war effort was rooted in out-and-out fraud. Just one example of the countless from that archive: an official reported that he/she was required to spend $3 million per day in each Afghan district with a USAID presence, and estimated that 90% of this money was straight-up squandered. This individual recounted asking a visiting Congressman if he could “responsibly spend that kind of money” in his own district at home. The Congressman replied, “hell no.”

        With such voluminously documented proof that the intervention was a bottomless pit of failure, there’s nothing surprising about a swift Taliban offensive to recapture the country — an eventuality which would assure any US departure was going to be flush with embarrassment. The only outstanding question was the precise logistical details……

        No doubt if Trump had followed through on his stated desire to finally end the war, the chaotic scenes emerging out of Kabul would’ve been portrayed as somehow part-and-parcel of his secret desire to upend the American-led world order at the behest of Vladimir Putin. The media outrage would’ve been even more apocalyptic and frothingly conspiratorial. Which actually gets to the interesting insight here: although the media’s affinities are largely against Trump and largely for Biden, both still attract hyper-animosity when they seek to end wars. That’s how pathologically screwed up US political and media culture is, and how warped the incentives are. It happened over and over again with Trump — remember when he bombed Syria, and for one wonderful night was no longer a maniacal tyrant, but noble and “presidential”? And then when he announced his intention to withdraw troops from Syria — later aborted — the media had a near-fatal panic attack?

        Similarly, what does it tell you that a corporate media which mostly treats Biden as a lovable, doddering Grandpa is suddenly ruthlessly critical of him in this one narrow circumstance? Wherein he actually does something unusual for a US President, by taking a defiantly hard line to fulfill his pledge to end a war? While also accepting that the resulting imagery might be ugly? If you really want to “end endless wars” and mean that as anything more than a hollow slogan, then implementing said “ending” is probably not going to be the prettiest picture……

        Here’s the bottom line. If you wanted the Afghanistan War to end after two decades of misery and waste, you just got your wish. Fixating on “execution” merely distracts from this simple fact. Because if “execution” is what you’re really concerned with, you should direct your anger at the countless officials who insisted year after year that the “execution” of the war was going fabulously well. They lied.”

        https://mtracey.substack.com/p/ignore-the-fake-experts-the-real

        1. Let me correct that rant.

          Long before the bungled Afghan withdrawal … the American people cast their VOTES to END the Afghan quagmire. We voted for TRUMP. He was the FIRST “Republican” (or Democretin, for that matter) with the BALLS to criticize America’s entire foray into the ME. Trump didn’t tiptoe around the issue as every election manager would have advised. No … he took the issue STRAIGHT ON. Get US OUT of endless no-purpose, no-goal, no-need military incursions throughout the globe. At the same time, he promised to fund our military and continue to build up our defensive capability.

          Trump’s message came straight from the Heartland and the hearts of REAL Americans … not the greedy leaches who have been sucking $$$$$ out of these excursions for DECADES!! Get US OUT! Trump understood that We The People were fed up.

          Make no mistake … The American people … Trump supporters voted to get us OUT. People who traditionally support our military in every way … including sacrificing their own children for the American cause. But We The People got WOKE to the JOKE our military missions have become. I beg to differ with mtracy/substack … but Trump and The American People were onto the military-industrial cluster-Fk in 2016. We’d had ENOUGH … after a mere 15 years of this bullshit. We are angry at MORE than just the Harvard boys and girls bungling of our escape.

          1. Trump had the right instincts, 100%. But he allowed himself to be talked out of immediate withdrawal by the lying, duplicitous generals and “intelligence” community.

            You know, the same “experts” who 48 hours before the fall of Kabul claimed that there was no imminent threat to that city, and that the Taliban would need at least 90 days to launch their final offensive.

            Fire. Them. All.

          2. I found with military officers is that they were book smart to reading past history and tactics, but really sucked in anticipating a problem.
            Or it was someone else’s responsibility.
            Or they just wanted a quick promotion up the chain and you were his bait in the field.

          3. I agree. Lay waste to the Pentagon. Fire every last one of the Obama SJW implants and promotions. Total scorched earth. Do to them, what Schwartzkoff did to the fleeing Iraqi Republican Guard. Scatter their burned out equipment and charred bodies for MILES along their one escape route.

    3. Jeppo, why did Biden tear up an already agreed withdrawal plan? Your article overlooks that point

  10. Just as well that the troops are coming home. Now the Chiefs of Staff can devote their total time and energies to fighting all the Really Important Battles: rampant racism, sexism, etc. Plus, this will open up brand new investment and career opportunities for them.

    You know … as it was predicted: “And they shall beat their swords into knee-pads, and their spears into high-heeled shoes.”

    1. And Raytheon employees need to develop new weapons systems that detect pockets of white supremacy, read: all Trump voters, and sends targeted EMT pulses that rendering all,our electronic devices useless. Then, we cannot spread the surging urgency to get Trump back in office.

      Right?

      1. Yup. That’s about it.

        Let’s put it this way: Arse-kissing carreerism in the armed forces of the Western World just ain’t what it used to be.

  11. What can one say.

    The thing is that an army is a war machine. If it becomes anything else, its basically out of business.
    The US could have eliminated the bad guys if they wanted.
    “If they wanted” is the key phrase.
    With the air power and the satellite intelligence, that would have been a rather possible task.

    This may be harsh.
    If you go to war you got to eliminate the enemy, if your plan is other than that, stay home and take up transgenderism or something.

    Remember when Gen. Schwarzkopf explained what is it that he was going to do?
    Yeah, he was going to kill the enemy, he was with the soldiers in the field, he was leading them.
    The idiot politicians stopped him before he would finish the job. Up to that point he was 100% right.
    He was a soldier and knew what to do.

    Just a few years later the other general stayed home in Florida and directed a war long distance. Those that went to school for a long time understand this as progress.
    There is doubt that the soldiers appreciated that.

    Here is Gen. Mathis explaining how it’s done.
    Answers to the last two questions.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO8FwYwG7dQ

    The questions are irrelevant political grandstanding.
    The answers are what army* is about.
    Staying home and tending to flowers would be an alternative.

    * All branches included.

    1. I must admit … one of the proudest moments in my life was seeing the images of bombed, burned, and charred bodies of the retreating Republican Guard. The same Republican Guard the media and the Harvard Graduates warned us were the most fearsome adversary since the Russians holding the line in Leningrad.

      I saw dead people … and it felt wonderful.

  12. The perfect fall guy. With Joe in office the globalists have the cover to do outrageously bad things to the country.
    When he’s at the White House they fly him to Mt. Weather every night for treatment to keep the idiot within the observable boundaries of competence.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352566/
    We’ll be voting again in November on the same machines we used in 2019 so….

  13. If the Conservatives in Canada had any balls at all they’d hire some kids to make billboards of similar Canadian content.

    But they don’t. We will have “carbon tax lite” and a more nuanced vaccination passport.
    I have no interest in “liberty lite” It sounds Canadian to me, and the frog in the pot is well past “warm”

    Biden took 90% of the past week off. Well it’s August. It should have been expected.
    Should have been expected. Afghanistan’s mess should have been expected.

    I expect they’ll have mid-term elections in 14 months in which to gauge the fallout.
    Oh did I say “fallout” … sorry, didn’t mean to bring Taiwan into the conversation
    China has said they’ll nuke Japan if they put up any fight for Taiwan…
    Where is the USA from September onward?

    1. The Cons must be trying as hard as they can to lose. How else to explain their behavior? Makes me wonder if they have a side deal with a deep-pockets friend of the Pony. I would not be shocked to find out that was true.

      Disgusted, but not shocked.

    2. Well said. Someone one on this blog stated some time ago that if Trudeau wanted to lower the age of consent to 12, O’Toole would retaliate by saying that 12 us low enough.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation