Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Don't Run
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
OK … so this creep’s speech is NOT deemed to be HATE speech. Seems to me that we can now forever retire the whole notion of “hate” speech. So, go ahead … use the “n” word. As in … “It’s kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to fat-ass nigger women.”
Good to know.
Thanks, privileged, racist, creepy-looking, Asian woman!
Oh … and I am just “kidding” … if you are “offended”
No, you were just parodying her attack on old white men in retaliation.
Our world is upside down. Today conservatives judge people by the content of their character, and not by the color of their skin.
And extremist liberals think blatant racism is acceptable.
Always go with those who judge people by the content of their character. The others aren’t right in the head and are prone to violence.
Candace Owens, a conservative black woman for those unfamiliar with modern politics, did exactly the experiment suggested in this video. She tweeted exactly the offending message, with ‘black’ in place of white and was immediately censored by Twitter.
1) I believe that she should be free to tweet whatever she wants – it’s called “free speech”, and “free speech” is for EVERYBODY, not just people whose speech I want to hear.
2) I believe that in a democratic society, I am free to exercise my “free choice” – and I freely choose not to subscribe to the NYT. And I’ll be honest here; I’d abandoned any thought of doing so a very long time ago, but if I was a subscriber I’d cancel it over them putting this racist filthy-mouthed individual on their editorial board and thus displaying their journalistic ethics.
3) I do not believe she was parrotting the sort of harassment she herself has received – I believe she’s a truly nasty person who really does derive sick joy out of screeching to a truly nasty echo chamber, who all think just like her. A pox on all their houses. There – I get to use free speech too.
I honestly believe she was ditched by a white boy some time in her young life. Otherwise I cannot understand this degree of hatred a young immigrant from Korea has for white people. Maybe she hates her parents (she has posted tweets demeaning their religion.) And so hates this country of white people they have forcefully taken her to.
Quite possibly echo-chamber feelgood, the Modern SJW version of tribalism…
Roseanne was unavailable for comment, but then again she voted for Trump, so its different, or something.
Good post. But I disagree with the speaker’s conclusion that the NYT’s decision to retain Jeong will lead to a normalization of respect between conservatives and liberals. On the contrary, the NYT’s hiring decision will legitimize the anti-white hate mongering that has become an accepted institution on the left. A different SDA post this morning says that the Democratic party is moving farther to the left. The NYT’s hiring decision is proof of that.