Every one of the 44 House Democrats who hired Pakistan-born IT aides who later allegedly made “unauthorized access” to congressional data appears to have chosen to exempt them from background checks, according to congressional documents.
All of them appear to have waived background checks on Imran Awan and his family members, even though the family of server administrators could collectively read all the emails and files of 1 in 5 House Democrats, and despite background checks being recommended for such positions, according to an inspector general’s report. The House security policy requires offices to fill out a form attesting that they’ve initiated background checks, but it also includes a loophole allowing them to simply say that another member vouched for them.
Unless Wasserman-Schultz was boinking him. Then it makes all kinds of sense.
Would the Muzzie boink a Jew?…………maybe it was an S&M thang………………
Let us not underestimate the lengths to which those who would destroy us will go. Anyone that would hop into the sack with that hag would do anything. Donning a suicide belt would be a far better way to go.
My guess is that there’s a direct link between the Awan’s, and a dead guy by the name of Seth Rich. DWS’s computer was the conduit for the DNC email “hack.” Rich probably was on the verge of figuring it out, and the Awan’s whacked him. Schultz is fighting tooth and nail to keep that one of her computers out of the hands of the Feds because she knows there are legal problems for her within that hard drive. I wouldn’t go so far as to believe she’s complicit in the Rich murder, but there are very real legal problems for her in a computer directly linked to her office.
Now, there’s a timeline that might be worth putting together.
I’d bet the farm banging Debbie Wasserman Schultz makes self immolation a whole lot easier!
Put him on the watch list.
Obama’s definition of “transform” America is not what you thought … he really meant to say “subvert” America. Pay attention my fellow FOOLS!
I think it’s far more likely that it was more along these lines:
Pakistani INI: “Osama Bin Laden? Sure, we’ll tell you where he is. But…but…there is something we would like in return.”
Obama: “Sure. Anything. I need this to solidify my tough on terrorism credentials. There’s an election coming up you know.”
Pakistani INI: (wicked smile)
You know what would really twist the knife? If the Donald went down to the daily press briefing and just said straight up: “all donations to the Clintons are non-refundable, and none of you are going to get what you paid for. I am pardoning Hillary, and removing the secret sector detail from the Clintons.” Then drop mike and exit stage left.
It makes sense to me that the only way Debbie Wasserman-Shultz would be seeing any action would be by holding some man beholden to her, by holding the key to his employability in the USA.
Probs a good thing I can’t sit on a jury in the USA.
That she – Wasserman- was having an affair with one of them has been my theory from day one.
“unless Wasserman-Schultz was boinking him”
It’s called taking one for the team. The team likely being Pakistani intelligence.
Remember, only Trump haters are allowed to “lie to investigators.”
Heck, they become heroes of the left when they do, just ask McCabe.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/03/alex-van-der-zwaan-sentenced-to-30-days-in-prison-for-lying-to-federal-investigators-in-special-counsel-probe.html