Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Katrina deaths were wholly preventable. People that choose live 18 feet below sea level and expect a 28 foot storm surge should maintain their dikes. The dykes were breached in something like 50 locations.
I think the relevant time period regarding hurricanes and AGW would be 1950 to the present. According to accepted climate science any effects of increased CO2 would not be possible until after 1950. It also eliminates the time period before reliable records on hurricanes.
As always the most important question is: would money be better spent adapting and increasing resilience in places that are most vulnerable to extreme weather/climate (AGW or natural variability) or mitigating CO2 emissions. In this case, I doubt there’s enough money to do both. Since wind and solar make electricity less reliable and less affordable it’s obviously not the answer. How did solar and wind installations fare in the hurricane? How does that compare to natgas, nuclear and coal plants. As was mentioned in the comments, you can’t black start the grid with wind or solar, even if they survive the storm. Electric cars are equally vulnerable since they rely on the grid whereas the ICE owner needs only a jerry can and a siphoning tube in a pinch.
An unpopular but important solution would be to discourage the building of oceanfront homes. Over the next 50 years stop the practice of using taxpayer money to backstop insuring million dollar homes in high risk areas. Maybe start with a cap on insurance in these zones. After 50 years it should be an ‘at your own risk’ build in high risk areas including oceanfront, landslide prone areas, flood plains the regularly flood and forests with frequent fires. Places and hazards where there’s no engineering fix that can decrease catastrophic events. Not a ban but promoting personal responsibility and risk assessment.
Somewhat OT, but pretty funny stuff…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6-xokjS4PE&feature=youtu.be
The fact that Hurricane frequencies have increased is because back prior to the 1950’s we really didn’t know about a Hurricane or Tropical storm unless it landed somewhere or was reported by a passing ship.
Now we know everything that is out there.