9 Replies to “Trump Vs Hillary On Energy”

  1. We all should know by now the demac-RATS wont allow any kind of drilling that why Obama the Fink blocked the KEYSTONE pipeline the demac-RATS are in the pockets of OPEC and the ECO-FREAKS

  2. Rather strange linked website. One would expect it to be either unbiased or pro Trump, but it’s not. Check out the other featured articles.
    A LOT of bizarre stuff in there (National Enquirer comes to mind).

  3. Really strange site (it reads like a stealth George Soros psy ops website) that has got it totally WRONG about Hillary’s supposed energy policy. If this website thinks it is convincing me that Hillary is going to take $$$ Millions from radical Faux-Eco RADICAL Tom Steyer … and then maintain “business as usual” for the fossil fuel industry … has got it’s head wedged in an odd spot. Hillary will continue the same FAILED idiotic “green energy” policies of the Obama admin. The same FAILED energy policies that Europe is starting to reverse.

  4. I didn’t check out the the rest of the OilPrice.com site but when I read the article, I found the author, Nick Cunningham, to be a bit pro-Hillary in his attempt to be neutral. For example the first thing that caught my attention was “Democrats do not clearly support an expansion of oil and gas production” and then goes on to say “Democrats call for an 80 percent reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050”. I guess you could call that “not clearly” supporting expansion…
    He also states “In other words, oil companies will much prefer President Trump, but they can probably live with President Clinton.” Really? He came to that conclusion after writing the article which states the following?
    – the Dems “…oppose drilling in the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans, and support a “phase down” of fossil fuel development on public lands”!
    – “America must be running entirely on clean energy by mid-century.” That would be less than 30 years from now and ties to the 80% reduction comment above.
    – On the way to that future the Democrats issued an interim goal of 50 percent clean electricity within a decade. This may impact O&G as well.
    Nick needs to get out of Vermont more often.

  6. Trump has clearly stated he would make the Keystone pipeline a go. It’s in the best interest for American refineries that once ran on Venezuelan heavy crude, to sell fuel to the world made from Canadian oil. It’s in both countries’ best interests.
    Trump Will Make America Great – Fúck Yeah

  8. The writer was obviously biased. Here’s what Hillary said in one of the debates:
    –Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a long answer for all the situations she’s against hydraulic fracturing, eventually admitting there would be very few places where fracking is legally allowed to take place — a near reverse of her past stance while heading the Department of State.
    “By the time we get through all of my conditions, I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place,” Clinton said during the Democratic presidential debate in Flint, Mich. Sunday night.–
    http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/07/hillary-wants-to-basically-ban-fracking-after-promoting-it-in-other-countries-for-years/

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation