19 Replies to “Reader Tips”

  1. o tries to nail it
    being legal does not always = ethical / moral
    private sector is different than public office
    abuse of office is not limited to either
    public servants & politicians aren’t equal

  2. EBD @ 10:06 p.m.,
    Paul Rahe’s piece titled “The Deepest Source of Our Troubles” provides a shallow analysis of the issues.
    He seems to have no understanding of the difference between pleasure and happiness, nor the concept of acting rationally versus irrationally.
    Rahe: “Our abandonment of chastity as a norm has had dire political consequences.”
    Wrong. Correlation is not the same thing as causation. The state of modern culture is the result of abandoning reason, not chastity.
    Indiscriminate sexuality is shallow; a rational person looks for deeper relationships based on love. But this is not an argument to get rid of birth control.
    Every person should be focused primarily on his or her own life and future. The prevailing ideology should be one based on reason and an appreciation of man’s nature, not on the mystic fantasies of religion (or Marxism).

  3. Look! A two-fer!
    What’s all this about, anyway — two flip-flops on the same day?
    So, you were in favour of getting Ford removed before you were against getting him removed right away?
    http://www.cp24.com/news/magder-consents-to-stay-of-ford-s-removal-from-office-1.1063883
    with the best money line:
    “I brought this application to protect Toronto’s municipal government from politicians putting their own interests ahead of the citizens they were elected to serve,” Magder said. “One of Ontario’s most respected judges considered in great detail the arguments made on my behalf and that of Mr. Ford before issuing his thoroughly reasoned decision. For Mr. Ford to pretend he is the victim of a ‘left-wing’ political attack is to insult the justice system that is a cornerstone of Canada’s strong and enduring democracy.”
    and
    So, your were in favour of the gun registry before you’re against it before you were in favour of it?
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/12/03/pol-trudeau-gun-registry-failed-policy.html
    with the bestest money line:
    “I voted to keep the firearms registry a few months ago and if we had a vote tomorrow I would vote once again to keep the long-gun registry,” Trudeau told reporters.
    “However, the definition of a failed public policy is the fact that the long-gun registry is no more.… The fact is, because it was so deeply divisive for far too many people, it no longer exists.”
    Strange happenings, strange happenings…I guess that vast left-wing conspiracy that Mr. Magder now says doesn’t exist might be a bit less vast than its members thought after all…

  4. I was wondering how long it would be before this would happen. It was only a matter of time considering the financial suffering of the print media and the public move toward accessing the digital versions of their favourite news sources.
    https://premium.sunmedia.ca/member/tos/products?url=premium
    So, no more free news. The NP has a paid digital version although they have not cancelled the Canada dot com website. The Globe website recently went to a subscription and you can not read the articles.
    I guess I will be subscribing to the online and mobile version at the introductory rate of .99 cents. We can not get the print version out here. Besides, would not want to miss the Sunshine lady. 🙂

  5. I was wondering how long it would be before this would happen. It was only a matter of time considering the financial suffering of the print media and the public move toward accessing the digital versions of their favourite news sources.
    https://premium.sunmedia.ca/member/tos/products?url=premium
    So, no more free news. The NP has a paid digital version although they have not cancelled the Canada dot com website. The Globe website recently went to a subscription and you can not read the articles.

  6. IS THE NFL A WILLING PARTNER IN OBAMA’S GUN BAN PLANNING ?
    First they fired Hank Williams Jr. for renouncing Obama communism, then we get Bob Costas reading an anti-gun rant off the telepromptor at half time – scapegoating the second amendment because some concussion riddled, juiced up ball jock offs his wife. Now we get TSN joining in on the 2nd amendment hate-fest.
    It’s a weird planet where Sunday night football has become a platform for commie anti constitutional political ranting. It won’t take much for me to turn of this second grade drug fueled football league and watch college ball – I guess here’s the incentive.
    BTW Obama gun control works so well that Chicago is now competing with Somalia as the murder capital of the planet. Followed closely by all the other major cities who have banned armed civilian defense – crime goes where victims are disarmed.

  7. NV53 @ 1:23am: I first learned of Paul Rahe when he was interviewed on Peter Robinson’s show, “Uncommon Knowledge”. Interesting fellow and clearly an intelligent man.
    But he lost me when he dismissed Mark Steyn’s thesis that America is headed towards a European style socialism. Rahe’s explanation of why Steyn was wrong was [paraphrasing]: “Steyn wasn’t born here and doesn’t understand the American spirit.”
    The recent election results show that Steyn understands the new American mentality a whole lot better than Rahe does.
    To understand America in 2012, arguably a good comparison is to look at Canada in 1972. In both cases, there was a popular leader (amongst his supporters) who had been in power for 4 years and could do no wrong. Both leaders promised the world and strived to deliver by borrowing oodles & oodles & oodles of money … with no particular thought about how to ever pay it back.
    In Canada’s case, being a smaller nation economically, we were eventually told that we’d go broke if our rising debt wasn’t brought under some sort of control.
    America is a different case because their currency is the world’s reserve currency. However logic tells me that eventually there has to come a breaking point where no more can be borrowed. BUT the majority of the people, so infected with the disease of wanting & demanding MORE FREE STUFF will not be so quick to accept any such change. So they will keep voting for more & more irresponsible politicians who promise them more goodies but no responsibility for ever paying for them.
    Not only will America “drive over a cliff”, but the entire mountain is going to collapse under their feet … and ours by extension too. 🙁

  8. Gene Zwozdesky, the Speaker of the House says Redford did not mislead house by saying she had no role in tobacco lawsuit
    He goes on to say that the matter is entirely subjective and that he would have to be satisfied of 3 things…
    1st) He has to be shown that the statement was completely misleading.
    2nd) The person making this statement had to know that she was misleading.
    3rd) That this person had to know she had intended to mislead.
    Ms Redford said that she believes that what she said was true.
    Here’s the facts that can be found through the freedom of information act…
    Dec 14th – A document signed by Ms Redford choosing the International Tobacco Recovery Lawyers.
    Dec 22nd – Letters going out to the loosing firms announcing that they weren’t chosen.
    A call going out to the winning firm saying they did get the contract.
    Jan 6 – An email from the winning firm saying that they are delighted to be the chosen law firm on this issue.
    Jan 13 – A follow up memo from the deputy minister saying Ms Redford made this decision.
    Jul 5 – An email to the CBC confirming Ms Redford made this decision.
    During the above dates (other than Jul 5th), Redford was Justice Minister.

  9. cal2,Danielle Smith will be on Power and Politics today talking about that issue.
    BTW,Scott Brison just called PMSH a “bully”. Is there anything more pathetic than a grown man calling another a “bully”?
    I remember a few years back when Dion did the same.It was even more pathetic and just confirmed his lack of backbone,that and his attempt at hockey,but it may have been the start of the whole ‘bully’ meme that the left embrace to cover their soft pink bottoms.

  10. If Hasan is treated as a terrorist, he could simply be shot… as an unlawful combatant,one would think.
    On the other hand,if the powers that be, wish to treat him as a military/workplace felon,and that is how things appear, then he should be coerced into following goddamn orders…..and shave his f&*king pork-licking puss.
    What if he insisted on appearing naked, would they accept that? I think not.
    Either way, plan a pork BBQ when he is eventually sent to his reward.

Navigation