32 Replies to “This Is Not A Parody”

  1. Tough interview. But he kept his composure and knocked that one about his favorite superpower out of the park.
    It’s great to see how affirmative action brings talented people to the forefront.

  2. What is there to say? Obama is not, and has never been, involved in issues, in policies, in programs.
    He has only one focus in his life: Himself as Special, as someone whom others look up to, are subservient to. Himself as able to control YOU. That’s all there is to Obama.
    Therefore, since taking office, all he’s ever done is to campaign. And play golf. All policies and programs are fobbed off to others, to Valerie Jarrett who really runs the USA, to his wife, to Soros, to Pelosi and Reid and so on.
    Obama cannot now campaign on ‘his’ policies. Apart from the fact that they are his in name only and he can’t speak about them, but they are failures. His stimulus, his GM buyout, his health care, his economic jobs, his czars and their regulations and so on.
    So, Obama is campaigning the only way he knows how. As Himself. The nice guy, the friendly everyday guy. All the bad stuff, according to Obama, has been done by Congress. Any failures are due to Congress. And to Europe. And to the tsunami. And to Bush. And so on.
    What will the Obama gang do now? These late night show and pop culture phone calls are geared to the everyday person who doesn’t follow politics, and that’s a large ratio of the population. So, they’ll have some successful effect for Obama. But, policies and programs?
    What will the Obama gang do to frighten the electorate to remain with Obama? A war? More domestic terrorism? They won’t sit back and watch their power slide away.

  7. That’s a first class interview. Where do I send my $3. in order to be put in the draw to sit beside Michelle at the upcoming Democrat National Convention?

  9. If this kind of interview keeps Obama thinking things are going great then I hope he keeps living in his bubble. But I sure dont want to be around the day after the election when he sees he doesnt win.
    I am not sure his psyche will be able to handle it.

  10. WOW!
    That he can find time from playing golf to do such in depth interviews shows how much he cares for America.
    Truly inspiring.

  12. “The RNC is responsible for the content…”
    I don’t think so…
    I think Obama is responsible for the (shallow, irritating, make-you-squirm) content.

  14. You just can’t fix stupid, but you most certainly con them into voting for you… again.
    I have a bad feeling about the gaggle of non-taxpaying voters with the selective short memories out there in the US of A. Lord hopes I’m wrong.

  16. You know its too hard to even describe how pathetic that was.
    This is the President of the USA. The mind becomes paralyzed at the inanity. The sheer nothingness of the content.
    That he wants 4 more years of being a dollar store Caligula, is astounding.

  19. In another farce interview he says if he had a choice in secret powers it would the ability to speak any language.
    I guess that would make it a lot easier to leak all those military secrets….

  22. The Obama is like the useless guy at work. He does a lot of talking and seems to get by on his personality but pretty soon all his co-workers are on to him and they start to call him “pockets” behind his back.

  23. Did any president before Bill Clinton actually go on talk shows or radio interviews? (I know, Google is my friend but it’s late and I’ve been overserved)
    Leaders of nations, it seems to me, used to be serious and professional and while in office they talked TO their constituents and didn’t get interviewed by mom and pop radio stations. Yes, many of them were still scumbags but at least they were somewhat dignified in their scumbaggyness.
    The Zero is just pathetic from arsehole to breakfast time. I guess that interview was the most challenging he would dare to attempt without his teleprompter.

  24. What historic presidential words. They rank right up there with “Nothing to fear, but fear itself”, “Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall”, and “Before this decade is out”.
    Ooh I’m all a tingle.

  25. And while we watch this drivel real , serious plans are afoot. While reality tv, talk shows buzz like bees people suffer and their government arms itself against those very people. For SOME reason or other. Delivery to the various agencies around the country to begin in October.
    Gotta watch what the other hand is doing while the one flim flamming distracts.

  26. Yes brian m., Clinton was the first president to do the late night thing. We discovered his preference for underwear (which may have a bit of an eew factor in hindsight) and his ability to play a sax. Now we have Obama. He has no platform but spends his time appearing on TV ( a la Jimmy Falon et al). So we know he wants to swoop around a lot and enjoys a certain type of pepper but very little about what he wants to do as the leader of the world.
    It is pathetic. I like Romney and especially like Ryan. Serious men who want to address serious problems. But can they get elected in a society where people seemed to be more concerned about whether they wear v-fronts or briefs or they like a certain superpower? I just don’t know.
    Obama is a charlatan. Paglia said it best (I am paraphrasing) when she said that he reminded her of a new orleans transvestite. Think about it.

  27. Dear god.
    My question is: were the local radio people instructed to NOT ask political questions? I very much suspect that they were.
    And clearly these were not local talk radio people. (politically why would Obama talk to anyone on talk radio – that’s not where anyone who would vote for him listens…) evidence if there ever was that Obama is it interested in enlightening anyone as to what he’s doing.

  28. Too bad the station couldn’t find some journalists to do the interview. Journalists like to ask politicians tough questions about policy.

  30. You didn’t build that. You just paid for it. ET is right, people are not defined by government, it’s supposed to be the other way around. It should be the businessperson looking at government programs and infrastructure and saying: you didn’t build that, we did.
    The Dems are, transparently, trying to not just change the narrative of politics, but to change the political culture of the US to blocks of identify voters, rather than its historically moderate, right of centre, bipartisan makeup.
    IMO it’s not going to work. The Dems will have to try another approach to win. What will that be?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation