Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Which holds us in more contempt? Politicians, or MSM editors?
Clearly, Obama is lying. The calculus can only be that it is better to lie and paper over the original statement, than to take ownership of the statement and carry on. We won’t notice, or care about the lie.
Trust is what facilitates government, finance, and media. All three have been working hard to shred it.
When trust fails – the carrot – what remains to motivate “us” is the stick. Perhaps going long on bulldozers is not such a bad investment after all.
Dar Heatherington to Barack. “stop lying now, it only gets worse”.
He’s shaking his head “no” while saying “we’re all in this together”. That’s his tell.
“out of context” – my a$$! Liar-in-chief. I’m thinking (believing) that this issue is going to dog him till Nov. 6th. Then hopefully he’ll be loser-in-chief.
Even when Obozo’s eating humble pie he’s coc*y and brazen. IOW, a bad actor.
No gold statuette for him.
Cross posted from Reader Tips.
Obama the builder’s ratings dropping.
http://www.dickmorris.com/obamas-ratings-dive/#more-9295
As stated earlier, in the strictest literal sense, due to poor sentence structure, he was taken out of context in that particular speech.
The now famous “You didn’t build that” (which assurely could be a rap title) referred to the roads and bridges not to the businesses immediately preceeding it.
If he was smarter, he’d have explained the right’s distortion. Simply saying “out of context” is akin to a “cheque’s in the mail” or “I’m not running again ‘cos I want to spend more time with my family” which hopefully he will be! A very nice guy spending more time with his perfectly lovely family!
BUT, of course, it’s perfectly aligned with the BIGGER CONTEXT which is hatred, envy, class warfare, “redistributive justice”.
Have to say I’m thrilled to be totally vindicated on my very early assessment of his marxism. I always found it amusing to see how many A-list conservative pundits couldn’t see this or admit it. Admit that America could really be the victim of a commie coup.
Nothing amuses me more than hearing him described as a standard issue liberal.
Pete said: “He’s shaking his head “no” while saying “we’re all in this together”. That’s his tell.”
How could we possibly know? We’ve never seen video of this guy when he’s -not- lying.
“Only government can break the vicious cycles that are crippling our economy — where a lack of spending leads to lost jobs which leads to even less spending.”
— President-elect Barack Obama in a Jan. 9, 2009 speech outlining his economic strategy at George Mason University.
me no dhimmi – ah well, I guess I’ll disagree with you. This is what Obama said:
“There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me — because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t — look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. (Applause.)
If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”
Obama didn’t refer to ‘roads and bridges’ when he said ‘somebody else made that happen’. Your analysis that Obama meant that IF you have a business, THEN, you didn’t build the roads and bridges’ doesn’t make sense. One could equally say that IF you were busy building the roads and bridges, THEN you didn’t have a business.
What’s the point of such a statement? Obama was clearly declaring that the individual does not and cannot exist on their own. His error was, as Krauthammer points out, in falsely defining the civil society (family, friends, work colleagues, church, clubs, etc) as the government. So, Obama declares that the community’s building of the roads isn’t due to all the individuals working in that community (and paying taxes for those roads). No, to Obama, it’s due to Government, which is seens as some kind of metaphysical Bank, filled with Money From The Gods (not from hardworking individuals).
As for Obama’s Marxism – I’ll still reject that. I doubt if he’s a Marxist (the evolving stages to pure communism). He’s certainly a socialist, in the sense of an elite governing central authority over the powerless masses. But, as we’ve argued before, I maintain he’s a psychological socialist, ie, he’s in it for the Power, the Power, and hasn’t an intellectual clue or interest in any policy in itself. He leaves policies to others; he takes power for himself.
And beyond the context, remember who he was speaking to. It wasn’t an audience of business owners. He was ginning up a bunch of his liberal followers (who equate ‘business owner’ with ‘rich’). It was pure class warfare / tax the rich rhetoric. i.e. – ‘those rich business owners aren’t any smarter than you and they don’t work any harder than you – they just got a lot of help from the public sector and they owe the public sector a great debt’.
Happy Birthday Ken (kulak).
I maintain he’s a psychological socialist, ie, he’s in it for the Power…
All politicians are in it for the power. The power to institute their particular agenda. Nothing unique about that.
..”Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at July 25, 2012 12:08..”
— HAPPY BIRTHDAY KEN —
and, many more.
`
Thank you for all the birthday wishes.
As some of you already know, seventy comes soon enough. Some days I feel like a young man, some days like a fifty year old, and increasingly more often, like a seventy year old. My wife suggests that sometimes I still act like a sixteen year old. 🙂
CJE, I thought he was speaking to the Roanoke Chamber of Commerce. Have I been misinformed?
Now is the time when Scott Brown juxtaposes!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oqDIjGsBEP8