Top-secret diplomatic cable revelations

WikiLeaks leaks previously reported news; journalists forget, credit Julian Assange for his top-secret sleuthing.
The Examiner published the following excerpt one week ago:

32% of British Muslim students support killing for Islam….In an ironic twist, this survey and its shocking poll results were made available only through the Wikileaks leaking of Julian Assange. The poll was revealed as part of a secret, diplomatic cable that emerged from the US Embassy in London.

Here’s the Daily Mail five days ago:

Around a third of young British Muslims favour killing in the name of Islam, a survey revealed by the WikiLeaks’ publication of U.S. diplomatic cables….A U.S. diplomatic cable from January 2009 quoted a poll by the Centre for Social Cohesion…

Here’s the problem: Julian Assange began releasing the American diplomatic cables just less than one month ago. The Centre for Social Cohesion’s study has not only been available to the public for over a year and a half, it has also been reported on in both blogs and newspapers.
Here’s “Islam in Europe”, from July of 2008:

The study “Islam on Campus” can be downloaded (PDF) from the Centre for Social Cohesion site. The study found that members of Islamic organizations held much more extremist views…

UK newspaper The Telegraph, July 27, 2008:

A third of Muslim university students believe killing in the name of religion can be justified, a survey has revealed….Hannah Stuart, from the Centre for Social Cohesion, co-author of the report, said…

(h/t Islam in Europe)

18 Replies to “Top-secret diplomatic cable revelations”

  1. It’s the data that the important part. One out of three have admitted they would kill me for Islam and I wonder about the other two.
    One out of three are admitted 7th Century thugs that adhere to a hideous death cult, and these are University students. I wonder what the numbers are for the average working stiff.

  2. Wikileaks also falsely takes credit for the Climategate e-mails, which they had nothing to do with. The e-mails were released by several “skeptic” sites, like Watts Up With That, The Air Vent, and others. But that lying little attention-whore Assange thinks he’s always the story.

  3. Has Assange released anything that we didn’t already know or at least suspect? Other than the names of some collaborators in Afstan that is. Really, if anybody thinks these are earth shattering, life changing revelations, is living in the lieberal dreamworld. Noone in the real world gives a crap. Personally I would just be happy that now he’s had his 15 minutes he would just go away. But I don’t think thats going to happen.

  4. Hey what the hell, Assange is entertaining. It’s fun to watch all the machinations going on on all sides.
    In the big picture it’s meaningless. A few feathers ruffled, no doubt, but they are feather that need plucking in my view.
    This will all blow over and humans will continue their self-destructo quest unabated.
    The Muslims … Only a third condone killing us … I submit that only a third will admit it.

  5. M.assange’s acolytes are very busy as bees indeed attempting to pre-rehabilitate their little tin god on wheels…
    i’m sorry but i’m not sanguine…i reckon fittingly the poor anti-social neurotic anarchochappie is for the high jump…

  6. “The Muslims … Only a third condone killing us … I submit that only a third will admit it.”
    How true.
    Another truth is that there are well over a billion Muslims that exist on planet earth.
    There are approximately 1.1 million Muslims in Canada today. Forget 1/3 (33%) who would see westerners harmed, what if only 1% of Muslims in Canada were violent extremists? That would mean 11,000 violent extremists in your country wishing to kill rape and subjugate you, your family, and everyone else you care about.
    Ask a Muslim to tell you what Canada’s demographics will look like in the next 5 years (he links to Stats Canada).
    http://jannah.org/madina/index.php?topic=2593.0
    If you can rationalize the math instead of sheepishly following the lies of government and left wing propaganda, you will clearly see the immanent danger we are in as a society.

  7. I agree, Osumashi (4:31), that the numbers (the percentage of Muslims/non-Muslims who do/don’t support X/Y) aren’t the story; the real story is the reporting stating that the Centre for Social Cohesion’s study was (to quote the Daily Mail, for one) “revealed by the WikiLeaks’ publication of U.S. diplomatic cables.” The CSC’s study was actually reported on by *The Daily Mail* (see here) in 2008, a year-and-a-half before Assange released the US diplomatic cables.

  8. I think the story here is a media intent on puffing up Assange into a much bigger deal than he is.
    Given the MSM is owned and operated by the Left, I can only assume this is for nefarious purposes.

  9. Knight99, Kursk,
    Just so.
    And it is not even on the msm radar yet as a story to repress by spinning the opposite.
    Remain armed, ready to protect your families from the inevitable anti kaffir progroms

  10. john begley @ 6:36 PM
    [……i’m sorry but i’m not sanguine…i reckon fittingly the poor anti-social neurotic anarchochappie is for the high jump……]
    How very British….”high jump” refers to a gallows…..no longer in fashion…even the frogs have parked their guillotines….sad. Perhaps somebody will improvise…….
    This violent islamic demographic will probably inspire emotion events……

  11. For those of you who want to know the truth about Canada’s immigration policies, I recommend Lowell Green’s newest book, Mayday Mayday. Curb Immigration. Stop Multiculturism Or It’s The End Of The Canada We Know
    “It is a powerful, reasoned, persuasive, well documented and thoroughly researched call for substantial reduction in Canada’s yearly intake of immigrants and refugees and an immediate halt to multiculturalism.” Read more at
    http://www.lowellgreen.com/

  12. Another do-the-match comment:
    Per this article, we’ve got the “tiny minority of extremists” pegged at around 33%.
    OK. We understand there are around a billion and a half Muslims worldwide. Let’s pretend females don’t do the killing (erroneous assumption, but there aren’t THAT many who do), so let’s knock off 50% of the original number. That leaves roughly 750 million Muslim males. And, let’s figure that about 1/3 of those males are too old for violence, and that 1/3 are too young for violence. We’re left with about 250 million Muslim men in the potential-jihadist population. Let’s be conservative and figure only 30% (instead of 33%) approve of killing: Voila!! That means only 75 million Muslim men are potentially out to get us.
    Oh swell. Dandy.
    Somehow that number doesn’t jibe with all those reassuring statements by Islamic front groups that only a “tiny minority” of “confused Muslims” somehow “misunderstand” how peaceful and tolerant Islam truly is…
    (Yeah, right. 1400 years of “peace” and “tolerance” — if by those words you mean “hundreds of millions of people slaughtered in service to a malignant belief system whose main principle is ‘Submit Or Die’.”)

  13. Dang it! It’s a “do-the-math” comment; not “match”.
    Those typing fingers just go off on their own sometimes.

Navigation